Relativistic Problems
Moderator: NecronLord
Relativistic Problems
Okay, I was reading The Algebraist by Iain M. Banks and there's one bit where a warship streaks past another ship at near light-speed (something like 0.8c or higher) and destroys it with a x-ray laser pulse. The paragraph says that the target was destroyed before it could even react, implying that the velocity difference was responsible for the suprise factor.
However any problems which the target might experience would also apply equally to the attacker right? Since both ships can consider themselves to be stationary and the other ship the one approaching at high speed.
Anyone want to help me out? Relativistic stuff gives me a headache.
However any problems which the target might experience would also apply equally to the attacker right? Since both ships can consider themselves to be stationary and the other ship the one approaching at high speed.
Anyone want to help me out? Relativistic stuff gives me a headache.
Light moves at 3E8m/s in all reference frames.
Howedar is no longer here. Need to talk to him? Talk to Pick.
- Darth Wong
- Sith Lord
- Posts: 70028
- Joined: 2002-07-03 12:25am
- Location: Toronto, Canada
- Contact:
Correct; given equal sensor technology, you would have as much trouble tracking the target as the target does tracking you. People often forget why ground-attack aircraft actually slow down to accurately strike their targets, rather than being designed to zoom by at Mach speed.Neko_Oni wrote:Yeah I know that much, but I'm saying that attacking a ship or system from a very high speed platform provides very little advantage since relativity applies to both of you, you're just as blind to your target's position as they are to yours.Light moves at 3E8m/s in all reference frames.
"It's not evil for God to do it. Or for someone to do it at God's command."- Jonathan Boyd on baby-killing
"you guys are fascinated with the use of those "rules of logic" to the extent that you don't really want to discussus anything."- GC
"I do not believe Russian Roulette is a stupid act" - Embracer of Darkness
"Viagra commercials appear to save lives" - tharkûn on US health care.
http://www.stardestroyer.net/Mike/RantMode/Blurbs.html
"you guys are fascinated with the use of those "rules of logic" to the extent that you don't really want to discussus anything."- GC
"I do not believe Russian Roulette is a stupid act" - Embracer of Darkness
"Viagra commercials appear to save lives" - tharkûn on US health care.
http://www.stardestroyer.net/Mike/RantMode/Blurbs.html
My immediate guess would be that the attacking ship had already performed the calculations necessary to know exactly when and where it would need to fire to hit the enemy ship. The target, not anticipating having to deal with relativistic attacks, hadn't the chance to make similar calculations.but I'm saying that attacking a ship or system from a very high speed platform provides very little advantage since relativity applies to both of you, you're just as blind to your target's position as they are to yours.
Knowing Banks, at least, that would be my guess.
The Great and Malignant
- omegaLancer
- Jedi Knight
- Posts: 621
- Joined: 2002-07-04 05:54pm
- Location: New york
- Contact:
Problem is that since the X ray laser operate at the speed of light, it would never detect it firing until the beam has already hit.SPOOFE wrote:My immediate guess would be that the attacking ship had already performed the calculations necessary to know exactly when and where it would need to fire to hit the enemy ship. The target, not anticipating having to deal with relativistic attacks, hadn't the chance to make similar calculations.but I'm saying that attacking a ship or system from a very high speed platform provides very little advantage since relativity applies to both of you, you're just as blind to your target's position as they are to yours.
Knowing Banks, at least, that would be my guess.
I can see where such hi relativitic velocities would aid missile attacks, with beam attacks it would not matter much once a targeting solution has been calculated.
Father, father when will these 8 hours ever end?
Omega lancer last of high guard. Keeper of the Common wealth ship yards
http://www.xsorbit2.com/users/higuardshipard/index.cgi
Omega lancer last of high guard. Keeper of the Common wealth ship yards
http://www.xsorbit2.com/users/higuardshipard/index.cgi
Thats assuming that there is no way to tell that an X ray laser is going to fire soon. Even a microsecond chargeup time is long enough for a culture mind to react, unless the enemy goes from being too far away to detect this to within fireing range very quickly. Of course, he might very well have messed up, too. David Webber made this same mistake in a first edition of one book, and he generally gets his Newtonian physics right, even if his technobabble is less convincing that Banks's.omegaLancer wrote: Problem is that since the X ray laser operate at the speed of light, it would never detect it firing until the beam has already hit.
SDN Rangers: Gunnery Officer
They may have claymores and Dragons, but we have Bolos and Ogres.
They may have claymores and Dragons, but we have Bolos and Ogres.
Mike is correct, however that isn't the only reason aircraft don't drop ordanance at Mach speed. There's also the issue of seperation of ordanace and airplane safety. You can't let go of a bomb/missile at any attitude/altitude/speed. I've seen test videos where the ordanance being dropped flys back up into the plane.Darth Wong wrote:Correct; given equal sensor technology, you would have as much trouble tracking the target as the target does tracking you. People often forget why ground-attack aircraft actually slow down to accurately strike their targets, rather than being designed to zoom by at Mach speed.Neko_Oni wrote:Yeah I know that much, but I'm saying that attacking a ship or system from a very high speed platform provides very little advantage since relativity applies to both of you, you're just as blind to your target's position as they are to yours.Light moves at 3E8m/s in all reference frames.
Of course this has nothing to do with your question, which is more about sensor ability, but I just though I the other fact should be added aswell.
Η ζωή, η ζωή εδω τελειώνει!
"Science is one cold-hearted bitch with a 14" strap-on" - Masuka 'Dexter'
"Angela is not the woman you think she is Gabriel, she's done terrible things"
"So have I, and I'm going to do them all to you." - Sylar to Arthur 'Heroes'
- GrandMasterTerwynn
- Emperor's Hand
- Posts: 6787
- Joined: 2002-07-29 06:14pm
- Location: Somewhere on Earth.
No, it wouldn't. You don't magically get an increase in power just because you increase the frequency and decrease the wavelength of the photons in your beam. You just get a beam of the same power that's 'bluer.'The Nomad wrote:I haven't done any calc or read the book yet, but wouldn't relativistic blueshift increase the power of the beam ?
Tales of the Known Worlds:
2070s - The Seventy-Niners ... 3500s - Fair as Death ... 4900s - Against Improbable Odds V 1.0
2070s - The Seventy-Niners ... 3500s - Fair as Death ... 4900s - Against Improbable Odds V 1.0
- Lord Zentei
- Space Elf Psyker
- Posts: 8742
- Joined: 2004-11-22 02:49am
- Location: Ulthwé Craftworld, plotting the downfall of the Imperium.
Correct me if I'm wrong, but isn't that a contradiction in terms? The energy of a photon is proportional to it's frequency. While energy is a conserved quantity, it is not invariant between refrence frames. The beam can have a higher energy in the target's reference frame than in the ship's reference frame.GrandMasterTerwynn wrote:No, it wouldn't. You don't magically get an increase in power just because you increase the frequency and decrease the wavelength of the photons in your beam. You just get a beam of the same power that's 'bluer.'The Nomad wrote:I haven't done any calc or read the book yet, but wouldn't relativistic blueshift increase the power of the beam ?
CotK <mew> | HAB | JL | MM | TTC | Cybertron
TAX THE CHURCHES! - Lord Zentei TTC Supreme Grand Prophet
And the LORD said, Let there be Bosons! Yea and let there be Bosoms too!
I'd rather be the great great grandson of a demon ninja than some jackass who grew potatos. -- Covenant
Dead cows don't fart. -- CJvR
...and I like strudel! -- Asuka
TAX THE CHURCHES! - Lord Zentei TTC Supreme Grand Prophet
And the LORD said, Let there be Bosons! Yea and let there be Bosoms too!
I'd rather be the great great grandson of a demon ninja than some jackass who grew potatos. -- Covenant
Dead cows don't fart. -- CJvR
...and I like strudel! -- Asuka
Hmmn, I know that the F-22's method of deploying missiles from it's internal bays (basically shooting the missile out of the bay at several hunderd g's) was meant to keep the plane as stealthy as possible while deploying missiles, but would it also be useful for deplying ordinance at mach+ speeds?Crown wrote:Mike is correct, however that isn't the only reason aircraft don't drop ordanance at Mach speed. There's also the issue of seperation of ordanace and airplane safety. You can't let go of a bomb/missile at any attitude/altitude/speed. I've seen test videos where the ordanance being dropped flys back up into the plane.Darth Wong wrote:Correct; given equal sensor technology, you would have as much trouble tracking the target as the target does tracking you. People often forget why ground-attack aircraft actually slow down to accurately strike their targets, rather than being designed to zoom by at Mach speed.Neko_Oni wrote: Yeah I know that much, but I'm saying that attacking a ship or system from a very high speed platform provides very little advantage since relativity applies to both of you, you're just as blind to your target's position as they are to yours.
- omegaLancer
- Jedi Knight
- Posts: 621
- Joined: 2002-07-04 05:54pm
- Location: New york
- Contact:
You wrong it does get more energy, the energy come from the kinetic energy of the reference frame it is leaving, so the ship firing the Beam actually slow down, it lose kinetic energy equal to energy gain by the blue shift beam...GrandMasterTerwynn wrote:No, it wouldn't. You don't magically get an increase in power just because you increase the frequency and decrease the wavelength of the photons in your beam. You just get a beam of the same power that's 'bluer.'The Nomad wrote:I haven't done any calc or read the book yet, but wouldn't relativistic blueshift increase the power of the beam ?
Father, father when will these 8 hours ever end?
Omega lancer last of high guard. Keeper of the Common wealth ship yards
http://www.xsorbit2.com/users/higuardshipard/index.cgi
Omega lancer last of high guard. Keeper of the Common wealth ship yards
http://www.xsorbit2.com/users/higuardshipard/index.cgi
Yes, relativistic blue shift would increase the power of the beam. Bluer light has more energy per photon, and the number of photons remains constant. There's a reason why UV light is bad for you in large quantities, while visible light is no problem.omegaLancer wrote:You wrong it does get more energy, the energy come from the kinetic energy of the reference frame it is leaving, so the ship firing the Beam actually slow down, it lose kinetic energy equal to energy gain by the blue shift beam...GrandMasterTerwynn wrote:No, it wouldn't. You don't magically get an increase in power just because you increase the frequency and decrease the wavelength of the photons in your beam. You just get a beam of the same power that's 'bluer.'The Nomad wrote:I haven't done any calc or read the book yet, but wouldn't relativistic blueshift increase the power of the beam ?
"preemptive killing of cops might not be such a bad idea from a personal saftey[sic] standpoint..." --Keevan Colton
"There's a word for bias you can't see: Yours." -- William Saletan
"There's a word for bias you can't see: Yours." -- William Saletan