[sirlancelot88] SD.net Forums Breed Immaturity

[Surlethe]

Which you can't seem to handle.

Ad hominem. Where's your empirical evidence to support this claim?

Hey, asshole, didn't you read the fucking rules, shitwit?

[Morilore]

Which you can't seem to handle.

Ad hominem. Where's your empirical evidence to support this claim?

It's only an ad hominem if you ignore the other 75% of my post. And my evidence is in your OP:

Look at the banner at the top of the page. What does it say? "Mockery of stupid people?" By exclusively mocking stupid people, instead of constructively correcting their errors, SD.net members prove themselves to be mean-spirited and immature.

The fact that you're bitching about it implies that you can't handle it. QED.

[FSTargetDrone]

Have you ever critically evaluated the worth of systems other than science in the understanding of the world, even if they don't produce "hard" results?

And which other "systems" can stand up to rigorous and repeatable testing? Fundamentalists such as yourself evidently cannot deal with the distinction that science, unlike various religions, makes no claim on perfection or absoluteness.

Science is not a religion. No one here worships it.

[sirlancelot88]

The fact that you're bitching about it implies that you can't handle it. QED.

Look at my post count. How many are there, around 20 or so? I rarely even COME to this forum, not to mention post in it. And have you ever heard of "sticking up for the underdog?" SD.net rightfully deserved to be knocked down a few.[/i]

[Morilore]

The fact that you're bitching about it implies that you can't handle it. QED.

Look at my post count. How many are there, around 20 or so? I rarely even COME to this forum, not to mention post in it. And have you ever heard of "sticking up for the underdog?" SD.net rightfully deserved to be knocked down a few.[/i]

So you can't handle it by proxy? Or you're just a fucking troll?

[sirlancelot88]

Have you ever critically evaluated the worth of systems other than science in the understanding of the world, even if they don't produce "hard" results?

And which other "systems" can stand up to rigorous and repeatable testing? Fundamentalists such as yourself evidently cannot deal with the distinction that science, unlike various religions, makes no claim on perfection or absoluteness.

Science is not a religion. No one here worships it.

Many people on this forum DO claim the perfection of science, or at least it's absolute superiority to any other form of rationalizing the human experience. Has it occurred to you that doubt is sometimes BETTER than omniscience?

[Stark]

You've been here for a month. You know that as soon as Admiral Kanos shows up, you're banned. So at least entertain us a bit first, yes?

EVRYON LIKE MY AV????

[SirNitram]

The fact that you're bitching about it implies that you can't handle it. QED.

Look at my post count. How many are there, around 20 or so? I rarely even COME to this forum, not to mention post in it. And have you ever heard of "sticking up for the underdog?" SD.net rightfully deserved to be knocked down a few.[/i]

It would certainly be interesting to be knocked down a few, but it won't be by some loser troll like you who has no purpose for posting here but to attack the board as a whole.

In accordance with A.R. 4, this thread and all similar threads in violation of the aforementioned rule, go straight to the Hall Of Shame.

If you have a complaint about the whole board, you are obviously unhappy here, so leave. Complaints like "so this is the way you do things at SD.Net" and "the prevailing attitude here seems to be" etc clearly indicate that you dislike something about our entire board culture and you should leave. If you persist on staying and acting like this, we will make you leave.

[haas mark]

The fact that you're bitching about it implies that you can't handle it. QED.

Look at my post count. How many are there, around 20 or so? I rarely even COME to this forum, not to mention post in it. And have you ever heard of "sticking up for the underdog?" SD.net rightfully deserved to be knocked down a few.[/i]

So if you want to knock some of the SDNet regulars down, how about responding to some of the people that have 14,000 or more posts, such as myself? Hmm? Or is it some form of, I dunno, inferiority complex you're suffering from?

Honestly, you're a fucking troll, and you're fucking tiring. Amusing, but tiring. I think, if anyone, you're the one that needs a fucking life, you stupid prick.

[Morilore]

Many people on this forum DO claim the perfection of science, or at least it's absolute superiority to any other form of rationalizing the human experience.

Quotes, please.

Has it occurred to you that doubt is sometimes BETTER than omniscience?

Which is precisely what science acknowledges and religion denies, shitwit. Every leading theory is said to be "the best we have so far."

[FSTargetDrone]

Many people on this forum DO claim the perfection of science, or at least it's absolute superiority to any other form of rationalizing the human experience.

Evidence of the many claims of "perfection", please.

Has it occurred to you that doubt is sometimes BETTER than omniscience?

Nope. I prefer education to ignorance and blind faith.

[Surlethe]

Many people on this forum DO claim the perfection of science, or at least it's absolute superiority to any other form of rationalizing the human experience. Has it occurred to you that doubt is sometimes BETTER than omniscience?

Whoah, there, Pebbles. How in the nine rings of hell do you equate "superior to other forms of rationalizing existence" to "no doubt whatsoever", genius?

[Sriad]

Has it occurred to you that doubt is sometimes BETTER than omniscience?

Doubt is the basis of the scientific method. Omniscience is a quality assigned to sky pixies.

I think that most people here, with that understanding, would say doubt is indeed better than omniscience.

[felineki]

So, your "lol Sd.net nerds don't get teh sexx0rz" spiel is mature, I assume?

[felineki]

Dammit, I screwed that post up.

Oh, and just so you know, the chick in my avatar isn't from an anime; she's from Street Fighter 3. Her name is Makoto.. and she'll kick your ass.

[CaptainChewbacca]

You've been here for a month. You know that as soon as Admiral Kanos shows up, you're banned. So at least entertain us a bit first, yes?

EVRYON LIKE MY AV????

That depends. Is that water splashing?

[Stark]

That depends. Is that water splashing?

I guess it *could* be. It's from out-of-frame. It sure shits lancerboot, though.

[Surlethe]

On the topic of this particular candle striving to make himself seen among a sea of bonfires, looky what I found in his post history. It appears this particular axe has been ground before.

[Dalton]

Troll eradicated.

If you have to ask why, then you haven't been paying attention.

[Morilore]

*obligatory "praise the admins" post*

[DPDarkPrimus]

Is it a new trend to start trolling on message boards over Spring Break or something?

See? Anime avatar.

You couldn't have picked a worse target to try and ridicule. I met my girlfriend thanks to this message board.

[SirNitram]

Bum bum bum.

Another one bite's the dust!

[Darth Wong]

Awww, the poor widdle fundie doesn't like us!

I like the ones who claim that science and religion are equally faith-based. They're the types who are so deluded that they honestly don't realize how stupid that sounds.