Darth Utsanomiko wrote:
I don't see why you're assuming we all derive our morals strictly from what society tells us is okay. I personally don't give a flying fuck what's accepted by the masses; I put religion, drug-abuse, obsessive sports fans, the advertising industry, and american politics onto the same side of the proverbial fence as pedophilia; it's all just an after-the-fact rationalization of the things stupid weak people do to hide their own faults and shortcomings. Fuck society's reasons for who they don't like.
Question: Do you consider family influence to be dismissable as an after-the-fact rationalization of the things stupid weak people do to hide their own faults and shortcomings as well?
What the hell are you talking about? My family taught me to think for myself more and more as I get older, and that's what counts. I really don't see what you're getting at, and wish you'd get to a point.
Darth Utsanomiko wrote:What the hell are you talking about? My family taught me to think for myself more and more as I get older, and that's what counts. I really don't see what you're getting at, and wish you'd get to a point.
how young are the kids in your minds? i have friends that have been fucking one another since they were 6 years old so obviously in some cases kids that young arent incapable of consenting properly. but then, they didnt look on one another as a superior that should be obeyed in the way most children look on adults. thats undoubtedly why those kids "consent", because they dont realise that they can choose not to (thats not to say they still couldnt be forced). if those kids were given a choice, guaranteed 99.999% of them would say no
Sì! Abbiamo un' anima! Ma è fatta di tanti piccoli robot.
kojikun wrote:how young are the kids in your minds? i have friends that have been fucking one another since they were 6 years old so obviously in some cases kids that young arent incapable of consenting properly. but then, they didnt look on one another as a superior that should be obeyed in the way most children look on adults. thats undoubtedly why those kids "consent", because they dont realise that they can choose not to (thats not to say they still couldnt be forced). if those kids were given a choice, guaranteed 99.999% of them would say no
UM....6 years old? Please tell me that isnt the actual age. They do not even have the hormone levels sufficient too......
GALE Force Biological Agent/
BOTM/Great Dolphin Conspiracy/ Entomology and Evolutionary Biology Subdirector:SD.net Dept. of Biological Sciences
There is Grandeur in the View of Life; it fills me with a Deep Wonder, and Intense Cynicism.
kojikun wrote:how young are the kids in your minds? i have friends that have been fucking one another since they were 6 years old so obviously in some cases kids that young arent incapable of consenting properly. but then, they didnt look on one another as a superior that should be obeyed in the way most children look on adults. thats undoubtedly why those kids "consent", because they dont realise that they can choose not to (thats not to say they still couldnt be forced). if those kids were given a choice, guaranteed 99.999% of them would say no
UM....6 years old? Please tell me that isnt the actual age. They do not even have the hormone levels sufficient too......
I used to get hard-ons in kindergarten, so I guess a kid can "function".
Hipper's comment was not in the same range as any of your numerous perversions have been, especially your request for the definition of a child. Only a pervert or a Devil's Advocate like Data Link would ask something as revolting as that.
Duran Korr's disgusting joke was more out of line than Hipper's comment, and far below the garbage you continue to spew from your wretched anus, sex related or not.
Good night, sir.
I believe in a sign of Zeta.
[BOTM|WG|JL|Mecha Maniacs|Pax Cybertronia|Veteran of the Psychic Wars|Eva Expert]
"And besides, who cares if a monster destroys Australia?"
sorry for not subscribing to your theory that there is a magic age at which a child is magically imbued with knowledge beyond comprehension, especially since it doesnt work in basically every case.
Sì! Abbiamo un' anima! Ma è fatta di tanti piccoli robot.
kojikun wrote:sorry for not subscribing to your theory that there is a magic age at which a child is magically imbued with knowledge beyond comprehension, especially since it doesnt work in basically every case.
I could get an erection in kindergarten, yes. I didn't know what to do with it 'til I was 13 or 14.........
kojikun wrote:how young are the kids in your minds? i have friends that have been fucking one another since they were 6 years old so obviously in some cases kids that young arent incapable of consenting properly. but then, they didnt look on one another as a superior that should be obeyed in the way most children look on adults. thats undoubtedly why those kids "consent", because they dont realise that they can choose not to (thats not to say they still couldnt be forced). if those kids were given a choice, guaranteed 99.999% of them would say no
That's plain old bullshit. Unless there was some serious hormones being dispensed a 6 year isn't going to do that on their own. I'm inclined to suspect there is/was something more at work there. Maybe just bullshit (on kojikun's part or the kids) to hormone therapy of some sort to sexual abuse. Because that isn't natural.
Spanky The Dolphin wrote:Hipper's comment was not in the same range as any of your numerous perversions have been, especially your request for the definition of a child. Only a pervert or a Devil's Advocate like Data Link would ask something as revolting as that.
Face it Spanky, koji has serious issues. Major fucking issues.
so far only you and spanky have protested (to this extent?). you call for my ban, but i keep this stuff on topic and in the threads, unlike SPANKY who spills over into threads that have nothing to do with this.
grow up you two. youre acting like two year olds.
Sì! Abbiamo un' anima! Ma è fatta di tanti piccoli robot.
Yeah, two-year-olds that you obviously have no problem with someone like a 35 year old man having sex with...
I'm seriously considering starting a banning thread for you, Kojikun. So far, you've done nothing but demonstrate how much of a pervert and blindingly stupid, illrational idiot you are.
I believe in a sign of Zeta.
[BOTM|WG|JL|Mecha Maniacs|Pax Cybertronia|Veteran of the Psychic Wars|Eva Expert]
"And besides, who cares if a monster destroys Australia?"
kojikun wrote:so far only you and spanky have protested (to this extent?). you call for my ban, but i keep this stuff on topic and in the threads, unlike SPANKY who spills over into threads that have nothing to do with this.
grow up you two. youre acting like two year olds.
We're the only perhaps, but there are plenty of others that think you're a sick motherfucker as well. Or did you repress all that?
Stormbringer and I are two of the few members who will actually engage you on these issues. Probably because everyone else is weakened by your mindnumbing stupidity and lack or deductive reasoning.
I believe in a sign of Zeta.
[BOTM|WG|JL|Mecha Maniacs|Pax Cybertronia|Veteran of the Psychic Wars|Eva Expert]
"And besides, who cares if a monster destroys Australia?"
Darth Utsanomiko wrote:Also note that in the Animal Kingdom, despite the facts such as female Bonobo Chimps tend to enjoy lesbian sex more often and for longer then straight sex, or that male ducks have been known to pair up like mates for life (kinda like lobsters, but umm... gay. ), sexual activity of this type does not occur between adult and immature animals. It's not natural in terms of sexual instincts and it's not natural for sane, emotionally adjusted humans.
Just though I'd clear that up, before they pull that 'it's only as unnatural as homosexuality, gay-basher' line of comparison like they always do.
), sexual activity of this type does not occur between adult and immature animals. It's not natural in terms of sexual instincts and it's not natural for sane, emotionally adjusted humans.
