Precious! I felt I had to correct this historical (hysterical?) revisionism. And I'm even gonna provide links and quotes for everyone too, just for old times sake! Now, I'm going to ASSUME that Mike is referring to the infamous Sheer Fucking Anger And Hatred (Prop 8..) thread above. If I'm incorrect, then please let me know.Darth Wong wrote:Funny how Wayne Poe unabashedly broke the vendetta rule against me a while ago and nobody thought he should be banned. Many people even thought it was excessive to dump him from the Senate.
Maybe it's different when you do it in the name of pro-Americanism, eh?
If that's the case, and Mike was referring to the Prop 8 thread, and not some other thread, then Mike is rewriting the events of what happened. In this post, Mike trots in with this statement:
Emphasis mine. It's quite clear that Mike kicked the door in with the big red letter "V" first in that thread, with regard to he and I. At that time, this is the only response I made in kind, in my next post:Darth Wong wrote:Please, by all means, explain yourself. And not with your usual vague "you know what I'm talking about" allusions, but with specific arguments.
After that, there's no question that Mike was fully violating the "vendetta" rule in that thread. First on Chewie:Lord Poe wrote:Strap yourselves in, folks, for another round of "Mike's going to pretend to not understand what Wayne is saying and misinterpret the fuck out of the entire post".
And then full bore, on me:Darth Wong wrote:Either that or I simply mixed him up with his brother, who said he would vote "Yes" on Prop 8. But hey, you've obviously got your hobby horse to work on.
Well, that's it for now. Have a nice day, everyone!Darth Wong wrote:I'm sure you'll hoot and howl and accuse me of various forms of dishonesty for saying this, but I think it just kills you that I've been having a grand old time bashing American political bullshit for pretty much the entire duration of the Bush Administration, especially since the accusations have been pretty much true. After all, if they weren't true, you'd be able to argue against them directly. Instead, you have to attack the way in which I make those criticisms, your perception that I'm being unfair, or biased, etc. You know, all the things you would normally find unacceptable if someone did them to you in a Star Wars vs Star Trek debate.
