More from the Neocon thread(Stim Neuro)

StimNeuro · Post by **StimNeuro** » 2006-02-23 05:07pm

ggs wrote:
SirNitram wrote:Tharkun's unglamorous exit from the forum split to Parting Shots.
Tharkun banned?

What a fucking suprise.

I was wondering when the admins would start baning people who disagreed with them.

SirNitram · Post by **SirNitram** » 2006-02-23 05:08pm

StimNeuro wrote:
ggs wrote:
SirNitram wrote:Tharkun's unglamorous exit from the forum split to Parting Shots.
Tharkun banned?

What a fucking suprise.
I was wondering when the admins would start baning people who disagreed with them.

We've scheduled that in for ten-past Armageddon.

What a huge surprise that someone's slithered out of the woodwork to claim 'BIAS! BIAS! THEY'RE JUST THROWING OUT EVERYONE WHO DISAGREES!' despite the fact Tharkun disagreed with the admin for pretty much his entire time here; he was thrown out for doing as he had countless times before, outright lying.

But seriously. If you really need your conspiracy theories? If that's what's necessary for you to rock yourself to sleep? Go ahead, beleive it.

Post by **Dalton** » 2006-02-23 05:32pm

StimNeuro wrote:
ggs wrote:What a fucking suprise.
I was wondering when the admins would start baning people who disagreed with them.

Are you accusing me of abusing my power? Need I give you a reminder of the rules of this forum? No?

You shall have one anyway.

AR2:

If you strongly disagree with our forum's policies, either keep it to yourself or leave. This is our forum, these are our rules, and if you don't like it, there are plenty of other forums out there. If you insist on staying and ranting about how you much you object to our rules, we will make you leave.

AR6:

Flaming of the staff is permitted, but only with respect to their views stated in any given thread, not their administrative actions. Those who pre-emptively or falsely accuse the moderators of "abuse of power" (a common troll tactic designed to discourage enforcement of rules against them) will be disciplined.

IR1:

This forum is private property. More specifically, it is my private property. I own the hardware, I maintain the software, I pay for the bandwidth. You are a guest in my house, and as such, you are subject to our house rules. If you think there is something unjust or unreasonable about our rules, the decisions of the administrative staff, or my behaviour in particular, TOO FUCKING BAD.

Post by **Edi** » 2006-02-23 05:37pm

StimNeuro wrote:
ggs wrote:
SirNitram wrote:Tharkun's unglamorous exit from the forum split to Parting Shots.
Tharkun banned?

What a fucking suprise.
I was wondering when the admins would start baning people who disagreed with them.

Go take a look at his posting history and the way he has lied, shifted goal posts, misrepresented people, brought up red herrings and generally acted like an asshat the whole fucking time he was here. Almost every time he posted in a thread, it went instantly down the shitter.

The list of people who got that from him includes but is not limited to Broomstick, Keevan Colton, SirNitram, myself, Patrick Degan, Mike and Vympel. And it sure as hell doesn't end there.

You want to be really fucking sure you can actually produce evidence of this claim of Tharkun being the target of a biased witch hunt. Because otherwise it's a baseless accusation of abuse of power, and worthier people than you have gotten a boot to the backside for making them.

Edi

Frank Hipper · Post by **Frank Hipper** » 2006-02-23 05:38pm

StimNeuro wrote:I was wondering when the admins would start baning people who disagreed with them.

Even though this little gem has been addressed a couple times, I honestly can't imagine how any person with a 10 year old's reading comprehension can view the exchanges leading to his getting banned and produce this kind of shit.

You either did not read the thread, cannot understand the thread, or you're running your mouth to hear your gums smack together.

Xon · Post by **Xon** » 2006-02-23 05:39pm

StimNeuro wrote:I was wondering when the admins would start baning people who disagreed with them.

Tharkun has had a history of distorting the truth. Normally he doesnt go far enough to actually lie but he gets fucking close.

He has also been known to troll, strawman and other debating fallacies too.

Plekhanov · Post by **Plekhanov** » 2006-02-23 06:59pm

StimNeuro wrote:
ggs wrote:
SirNitram wrote:Tharkun's unglamorous exit from the forum split to Parting Shots.
Tharkun banned?

What a fucking suprise.
I was wondering when the admins would start baning people who disagreed with them.

How do you account for the lively debates covering a whole range of topics that go on here all the time if the admins ban "people who disagreed with them"?

It's not contrary opinions that the admins take exception to but dishonest debating, something Tharkun had a long and inglorious history of.

Post by **AdmiralKanos** » 2006-02-23 09:56pm

StimNeuro wrote:I was wondering when the admins would start baning people who disagreed with them.

You know the funny thing about assholes who make false accusations of administrative abuse of power? There's nothing worse that they can possibly say if you ban them.

So if some asshat is going to say that even when it's obviously not true, what reason do I have to tolerate his slanderous accusations?

Answer: absolutely none.

SirNitram · Post by **SirNitram** » 2006-02-23 10:06pm

And for tonight's theme song, Queen's Another One Bites The Dust.