SDN World 3 Commentary Thread II

Create, read, or participate in text-based RPGs

Moderators: Thanas, Steve

Locked
User avatar
Ryan Thunder
Village Idiot
Posts: 4139
Joined: 2007-09-16 07:53pm
Location: Canada

Re: SDN World 3 Commentary Thread II

Post by Ryan Thunder »

Minister of Pigeonry wrote:Spain declared neutrality in the conflict. The Mexicans were permitted to move troops through Costa Rica in an agreement made quite a while back. Not like I could really say no, given I only have a few guard units there. Really, if they wanted, they could just march through at anytime, agreement or no agreement.
Then fight them. Christ, what is your problem? You do realize you're now responsible for nearly 30 000 Colombian lives lost in the initial invasion and who knows how many rapes and property theft...
SDN Worlds 5: Sanctum
User avatar
Thanas
Magister
Magister
Posts: 30779
Joined: 2004-06-26 07:49pm

Re: SDN World 3 Commentary Thread II

Post by Thanas »

Ryan Thunder wrote:
Minister of Pigeonry wrote:Spain declared neutrality in the conflict. The Mexicans were permitted to move troops through Costa Rica in an agreement made quite a while back. Not like I could really say no, given I only have a few guard units there. Really, if they wanted, they could just march through at anytime, agreement or no agreement.
Then fight them. Christ, what is your problem?
Yeah, sure, demand of Spain that they bleed and lose their territory (which is pretty much guaranteed in the event of such a war) so you can be safe. :roll:
Whoever says "education does not matter" can try ignorance
------------
A decision must be made in the life of every nation at the very moment when the grasp of the enemy is at its throat. Then, it seems that the only way to survive is to use the means of the enemy, to rest survival upon what is expedient, to look the other way. Well, the answer to that is 'survival as what'? A country isn't a rock. It's not an extension of one's self. It's what it stands for. It's what it stands for when standing for something is the most difficult! - Chief Judge Haywood
------------
My LPs
User avatar
Ryan Thunder
Village Idiot
Posts: 4139
Joined: 2007-09-16 07:53pm
Location: Canada

Re: SDN World 3 Commentary Thread II

Post by Ryan Thunder »

Well if you want a purely self-serving reason; Being at war with a canal board member, they can no longer use the canal. I don't think they'll like having to navigate all the way around Chiletina to get to Asia.
SDN Worlds 5: Sanctum
User avatar
Thanas
Magister
Magister
Posts: 30779
Joined: 2004-06-26 07:49pm

Re: SDN World 3 Commentary Thread II

Post by Thanas »

Ryan Thunder wrote:Well if you want a purely self-serving reason; Being at war with a canal board member, they can no longer use the canal. I don't think they'll like having to navigate all the way around Chiletina to get to Asia.
Actually, the rules for the canal board require you get a majority of the canal bord members first to do so. EDIT - never mind, apparently this is automatic.
Whoever says "education does not matter" can try ignorance
------------
A decision must be made in the life of every nation at the very moment when the grasp of the enemy is at its throat. Then, it seems that the only way to survive is to use the means of the enemy, to rest survival upon what is expedient, to look the other way. Well, the answer to that is 'survival as what'? A country isn't a rock. It's not an extension of one's self. It's what it stands for. It's what it stands for when standing for something is the most difficult! - Chief Judge Haywood
------------
My LPs
User avatar
Ryan Thunder
Village Idiot
Posts: 4139
Joined: 2007-09-16 07:53pm
Location: Canada

Re: SDN World 3 Commentary Thread II

Post by Ryan Thunder »

Thanas wrote:
Ryan Thunder wrote:
Minister of Pigeonry wrote:Spain declared neutrality in the conflict. The Mexicans were permitted to move troops through Costa Rica in an agreement made quite a while back. Not like I could really say no, given I only have a few guard units there. Really, if they wanted, they could just march through at anytime, agreement or no agreement.
Then fight them. Christ, what is your problem?
Yeah, sure, demand of Spain that they bleed and lose their territory (which is pretty much guaranteed in the event of such a war) so you can be safe. :roll:
I doubt Mexico would not be deterred by Spains refusal to allow them to use their territory. Either they allow the Mexicans through and I take the colony on my way back as repayment for lives lost on their heads, or they refuse and suddenly Mexico has Spain and her allies to deal with as well.

You could've nipped this whole thing in the bud without firing a shot!
SDN Worlds 5: Sanctum
User avatar
Minister of Pigeonry
Youngling
Posts: 105
Joined: 2009-10-22 12:45am

Re: SDN World 3 Commentary Thread II

Post by Minister of Pigeonry »

With Mexican troops surging through Costa Rica, do you really think a Division or so of Costa Rican Guard troops could oust them? I only really control Costa Rica thanks to the Mexicans leaving it alone, I'm not going to rock the boat. If you're really going to deny my canal access that will sting a bit, I get alot of raw materials from Cascadia but it isn't devestating and may drive me and, by proxy, my allies closer to the Mexicans.
User avatar
Thanas
Magister
Magister
Posts: 30779
Joined: 2004-06-26 07:49pm

Re: SDN World 3 Commentary Thread II

Post by Thanas »

Spain has one fucking division in there. How long do you think they would have held out? That would also have utterly wrecked their country as it would become a battlefield.
Whoever says "education does not matter" can try ignorance
------------
A decision must be made in the life of every nation at the very moment when the grasp of the enemy is at its throat. Then, it seems that the only way to survive is to use the means of the enemy, to rest survival upon what is expedient, to look the other way. Well, the answer to that is 'survival as what'? A country isn't a rock. It's not an extension of one's self. It's what it stands for. It's what it stands for when standing for something is the most difficult! - Chief Judge Haywood
------------
My LPs
User avatar
Ryan Thunder
Village Idiot
Posts: 4139
Joined: 2007-09-16 07:53pm
Location: Canada

Re: SDN World 3 Commentary Thread II

Post by Ryan Thunder »

Thanas wrote:Spain has one fucking division in there. How long do you think they would have held out? That would also have utterly wrecked their country as it would become a battlefield.
They don't have to. The possibility of war with Spain and her allies would be deterrent enough to avoid it altogether, and the canal would not be a warzone at the moment.
SDN Worlds 5: Sanctum
User avatar
Thanas
Magister
Magister
Posts: 30779
Joined: 2004-06-26 07:49pm

Re: SDN World 3 Commentary Thread II

Post by Thanas »

Why? Spain has Germany as her ally and Portugal. Neither can do much against Mexico as they cannot transplant a million troops to Costa Rica - and there is also the Dutch situation, which is keeping me pretty occupied and is costing me a lot of troops.

Please explain to me what Germany and Portugal can do to prevent an invasion by Mexico. Heck, thanks to your dismal fleet, in the advent of a war with mexico Wilkens can pretty much shut down my trade in that region and it would take a long time for the HSF to arrive there.
Whoever says "education does not matter" can try ignorance
------------
A decision must be made in the life of every nation at the very moment when the grasp of the enemy is at its throat. Then, it seems that the only way to survive is to use the means of the enemy, to rest survival upon what is expedient, to look the other way. Well, the answer to that is 'survival as what'? A country isn't a rock. It's not an extension of one's self. It's what it stands for. It's what it stands for when standing for something is the most difficult! - Chief Judge Haywood
------------
My LPs
User avatar
Siege
Sith Marauder
Posts: 4108
Joined: 2004-12-11 12:35pm

Re: SDN World 3 Commentary Thread II

Post by Siege »

Irrespective of whether or not the Spanish could've mounted a viable defence of Costa Rica against a Mexican invasion (the answer to which is 'most likely not'), outright allowing the Mexicans to pass through on their merry way to making mighty war on Gran Colombia does in fact constitute a major breach of neutrality according to the Hague Convention. Belligerent armies' men and matériel may not be transported across neutral territory (wounded excepted), and the neutral power is in fact required to intern belligerent troops who reach its territory. So yes, the Spanish actions are grounds for Gran Colombia to declare war on Spain.
Image
SDN World 2: The North Frequesuan Trust
SDN World 3: The Sultanate of Egypt
SDN World 4: The United Solarian Sovereignty
SDN World 5: San Dorado
There'll be a bodycount, we're gonna watch it rise
The folks at CNN, they won't believe their eyes
User avatar
Thanas
Magister
Magister
Posts: 30779
Joined: 2004-06-26 07:49pm

Re: SDN World 3 Commentary Thread II

Post by Thanas »

^Not disputing that, just pointing out that Spain may not have had much of a choice in the matter.
Whoever says "education does not matter" can try ignorance
------------
A decision must be made in the life of every nation at the very moment when the grasp of the enemy is at its throat. Then, it seems that the only way to survive is to use the means of the enemy, to rest survival upon what is expedient, to look the other way. Well, the answer to that is 'survival as what'? A country isn't a rock. It's not an extension of one's self. It's what it stands for. It's what it stands for when standing for something is the most difficult! - Chief Judge Haywood
------------
My LPs
User avatar
Ryan Thunder
Village Idiot
Posts: 4139
Joined: 2007-09-16 07:53pm
Location: Canada

Re: SDN World 3 Commentary Thread II

Post by Ryan Thunder »

Thanas wrote:^Not disputing that, just pointing out that Spain may not have had much of a choice in the matter.
You can crush them in the long run. People seem to forget about that. Together you'd have my armies, your fleets, and Brazil's. It'd be a fucking massacre after a very short period of success, and he knows it.

But fine. We can forget about it.
SDN Worlds 5: Sanctum
User avatar
Siege
Sith Marauder
Posts: 4108
Joined: 2004-12-11 12:35pm

Re: SDN World 3 Commentary Thread II

Post by Siege »

Well, it's your choice ultimately but I wouldn't simply forget this. It'd set a pretty bad precedent. If the Mexican invasion is repelled (a sizeable 'if' at this stage, I grant you), I'd be annexing Costa Rica if I were Gran Colombia. I mean, the Spanish obviously cannot do anything about it... And hey, the Spanish crown doesn't give a hoot about its sovereignty anyway, 'cause they haven't even so much as sent a politely worded letter of protest to the Mexicans ;).
Image
SDN World 2: The North Frequesuan Trust
SDN World 3: The Sultanate of Egypt
SDN World 4: The United Solarian Sovereignty
SDN World 5: San Dorado
There'll be a bodycount, we're gonna watch it rise
The folks at CNN, they won't believe their eyes
User avatar
Ryan Thunder
Village Idiot
Posts: 4139
Joined: 2007-09-16 07:53pm
Location: Canada

Re: SDN World 3 Commentary Thread II

Post by Ryan Thunder »

Siege wrote:Well, it's your choice ultimately but I wouldn't simply forget this. It'd set a pretty bad precedent. If the Mexican invasion is repelled (a sizeable 'if' at this stage, I grant you), I'd be annexing Costa Rica if I were Gran Colombia. I mean, the Spanish obviously cannot do anything about it... And hey, they probably won't complain since clearly the Spanish crown doesn't give a hoot about their sovereignty anyway, 'cause they haven't even so much as sent a politely worded letter of protest to the Mexicans ;).
Yes. I'm still considering how I'd handle it. But I'm not going to spontaneously declare war on the Spanish at this point because I'll only regret it later. Unlike Mexico, it seems. :roll:
SDN Worlds 5: Sanctum
User avatar
Minister of Pigeonry
Youngling
Posts: 105
Joined: 2009-10-22 12:45am

Re: SDN World 3 Commentary Thread II

Post by Minister of Pigeonry »

Siege wrote:Well, it's your choice ultimately but I wouldn't simply forget this. It'd set a pretty bad precedent. If the Mexican invasion is repelled (a sizeable 'if' at this stage, I grant you), I'd be annexing Costa Rica if I were Gran Colombia. I mean, the Spanish obviously cannot do anything about it... And hey, they clearly they don't give a hoot about their sovereignty anyway, 'cause the Spanish crown hasn't even so much as sent a politely worded condemnation to the Mexicans.
We did declare neutrality and offered guarantees that Spanish ships, etc. would avoid all conflict zones. Save for the agreement with Mexico permitting their transit through CR, Spain has offered nothing more.

I have no interest in conflict with either Mexico or Colombia, my aim is only to secure Costa Rica and seize the Dutch Caribbean holdings.
User avatar
Steve
Emperor's Hand
Posts: 9774
Joined: 2002-07-03 01:09pm
Location: Florida USA
Contact:

Re: SDN World 3 Commentary Thread II

Post by Steve »

Under normal circumstances this Saturday would be the start of October 1925 and Q4 for the year, but as we have conflicts from late June, July, and August that need processing, I'm going to announce a time freeze. It's only August and will stay so until we catch these conflicts up.

My thanks again to Siege for taking up the mantle of the Low Countries when I know he'd rather be playing Egyptian politics and stuff. :)
”A Radical is a man with both feet planted firmly in the air.” – Franklin Delano Roosevelt

"No folly is more costly than the folly of intolerant idealism." - Sir Winston L. S. Churchill, Princips Britannia

American Conservatism is about the exercise of personal responsibility without state interference in the lives of the citizenry..... unless, of course, it involves using the bludgeon of state power to suppress things Conservatives do not like.

DONALD J. TRUMP IS A SEDITIOUS TRAITOR AND MUST BE IMPEACHED
User avatar
Steve
Emperor's Hand
Posts: 9774
Joined: 2002-07-03 01:09pm
Location: Florida USA
Contact:

Re: SDN World 3 Commentary Thread II

Post by Steve »

Akhlut, Bluewolf has left the game, so Qing China is an NPC.

What do you mean by acquiring a port? As it stands you probably import and export via Chinese and Soviet railroads, but I doubt they'll sell you a port under any cost.
”A Radical is a man with both feet planted firmly in the air.” – Franklin Delano Roosevelt

"No folly is more costly than the folly of intolerant idealism." - Sir Winston L. S. Churchill, Princips Britannia

American Conservatism is about the exercise of personal responsibility without state interference in the lives of the citizenry..... unless, of course, it involves using the bludgeon of state power to suppress things Conservatives do not like.

DONALD J. TRUMP IS A SEDITIOUS TRAITOR AND MUST BE IMPEACHED
User avatar
Coyote
Rabid Monkey
Posts: 12464
Joined: 2002-08-23 01:20am
Location: The glorious Sun-Barge! Isis, Isis, Ra,Ra,Ra!
Contact:

Re: SDN World 3 Commentary Thread II

Post by Coyote »

Crap, we're already entering Q4? I didn't even realize we were into Q3. Thanas, do I have my second ship, then? Or are you hanging onto it for the duration of the Dutch situation?


Also, Ryan, it seems to me that your outrage of Spain's stance vis-a-vis the Mexican invasion would be excellent plot fodder in-game. You know, just sayin'. I mean, I could see France for example, in 1940, wanting to know why those damn Dutch and Belgians didn't throw themselves in front of the Wehrmacht's treads and stuff. You have a point, really, about Spanish complicity, but Spain also has a point about "WTF can I really do about it that isn't suicide?" Make a stink in character.

Sad that most of the potentially interesting politics is talking place OOC.
Something about Libertarianism always bothered me. Then one day, I realized what it was:
Libertarian philosophy can be boiled down to the phrase, "Work Will Make You Free."


In Libertarianism, there is no Government, so the Bosses are free to exploit the Workers.
In Communism, there is no Government, so the Workers are free to exploit the Bosses.
So in Libertarianism, man exploits man, but in Communism, its the other way around!

If all you want to do is have some harmless, mindless fun, go H3RE INST3ADZ0RZ!!
Grrr! Fight my Brute, you pansy!
Norseman
Jedi Council Member
Posts: 1666
Joined: 2004-07-02 10:20am

Re: SDN World 3 Commentary Thread II

Post by Norseman »

By the way you lot on what date was the Mexican ultimatum delivered? I need to know because that triggered some contingency plans of mine own and I need to know when they went into motion.
Norseman's Fics the SD archive of my fics.
User avatar
Akhlut
Sith Devotee
Posts: 2660
Joined: 2005-09-06 02:23pm
Location: The Burger King Bathroom

Re: SDN World 3 Commentary Thread II

Post by Akhlut »

Steve wrote:Akhlut, Bluewolf has left the game, so Qing China is an NPC.

What do you mean by acquiring a port? As it stands you probably import and export via Chinese and Soviet railroads, but I doubt they'll sell you a port under any cost.

I thought he was still in. Oh well.

At anyrate, he sent me a PM that said the following:
Well I have posted my status of Manchuria and my status with Mongolia.

As said I don't want to get into a war but I am not willing to let you two land grab Manchuria. So I ask if we could come to a peaceful solution weather it be buying land or some form of port rent. I will even make it worth your while if you do go with that.

Bluewolf.

Since I didn't go on a mad invasion of Manchuria, I'd say that I'd lived up to that end of this, at least.
SDNet: Unbelievable levels of pedantry that you can't find anywhere else on the Internet!
User avatar
Siege
Sith Marauder
Posts: 4108
Joined: 2004-12-11 12:35pm

Re: SDN World 3 Commentary Thread II

Post by Siege »

Minister of Pigeonry wrote:We did declare neutrality and offered guarantees that Spanish ships, etc. would avoid all conflict zones. Save for the agreement with Mexico permitting their transit through CR, Spain has offered nothing more.
This really doesn't matter. You can't declare neutrality and then grant Mexican troops passage on their way to the war. That's having your cake and eat it too: you're either neutral or you're not, and when you're allowing belligerent troops to march over your sovereign territory then you're clearly not neutral. As I understand it your actions make you a belligerent too, by virtue of materially aiding and abetting one of the aggressors in direct violation of your declared neutrality. Incidentally unless I'm sorely mistaken that last bit should be a pretty damn big deal in interbellum politics.

Amusingly, if you'd not given permission and shot at any Mexicans attempting to cross your sovereign territory you would still be neutral (as per Chapt. I, Art. 10. of the Hague Convention of 1907). Of course that means you'd probably have lost Costa Rica to the Mexicans but hey, ya wanna be neutral, ya gotta make sacrifices!
Last edited by Siege on 2009-12-17 05:05pm, edited 2 times in total.
Image
SDN World 2: The North Frequesuan Trust
SDN World 3: The Sultanate of Egypt
SDN World 4: The United Solarian Sovereignty
SDN World 5: San Dorado
There'll be a bodycount, we're gonna watch it rise
The folks at CNN, they won't believe their eyes
Lascaris
Padawan Learner
Posts: 229
Joined: 2008-08-10 08:43am
Location: Rhodia, Nebular cluster

Re: SDN World 3 Commentary Thread II

Post by Lascaris »

Thanas wrote:
Ryan Thunder wrote:
Minister of Pigeonry wrote:Spain declared neutrality in the conflict. The Mexicans were permitted to move troops through Costa Rica in an agreement made quite a while back. Not like I could really say no, given I only have a few guard units there. Really, if they wanted, they could just march through at anytime, agreement or no agreement.
Then fight them. Christ, what is your problem?
Yeah, sure, demand of Spain that they bleed and lose their territory (which is pretty much guaranteed in the event of such a war) so you can be safe. :roll:
Well if Spain can't protect the neutrality of its territory Colombia has every right to enter it too in response to Mexico doing so...
User avatar
Minister of Pigeonry
Youngling
Posts: 105
Joined: 2009-10-22 12:45am

Re: SDN World 3 Commentary Thread II

Post by Minister of Pigeonry »

Siege wrote: This really doesn't matter. You can't declare neutrality and then grant Mexican troops passage on their way to the war. That's having your cake and eat it too: you're either neutral or you're not, and when you're allowing belligerent troops to march over your sovereign territory then you're clearly not neutral. As I understand it your actions make you a belligerent, materially aiding and abetting one of the aggressors in direct violation of your declared neutrality. Which unless I'm sorely mistaken should be a pretty damn big deal in interbellum politics.

Amusingly, if you'd not given permission and shot at any Mexicans attempting to cross your sovereign territory you would still be neutral (as per Chapt. I, Art. 10. of the Hague Convention of 1907). Of course that means you'd probably have lost Costa Rica to the Mexicans but hey, ya wanna be neutral, ya gotta make sacrifices!
The agreement was decided upon sometime before Mexico hinted it intended to attack Colombia so, damned if you do, damned if you don't, I suppose. Either way, if shots are fired they will be Colombian, I'm not going to provoke them or threaten them. If they wish to use the Spanish-Mexican agreement as justification they have a right to attack and accept any consequences that might follow.
User avatar
Steve
Emperor's Hand
Posts: 9774
Joined: 2002-07-03 01:09pm
Location: Florida USA
Contact:

Re: SDN World 3 Commentary Thread II

Post by Steve »

For Norade's Suriname attack:

[17:12] sbbigsteve: So, 9 for a completely successful crossing. 3-5 is failure, 6-8 is minor success - some footholds but they're bottled up.- 9-12 for general success, 13-16 for outstanding success, 17 and 18 has the Dutch forces utterly routed and Suriname wide open for conquest.
[17:12] sbbigsteve: //roll-dice 3-sided 6
[17:12] sbbigsteve: sbbigsteve rolled 3 6-sided dice: 4 1 4
[17:13] sbbigsteve: General success.

Rogue and I were there, Norse and Lascaris witnessed.


Rogue should be PMing Thanas and Siege results now as well.
”A Radical is a man with both feet planted firmly in the air.” – Franklin Delano Roosevelt

"No folly is more costly than the folly of intolerant idealism." - Sir Winston L. S. Churchill, Princips Britannia

American Conservatism is about the exercise of personal responsibility without state interference in the lives of the citizenry..... unless, of course, it involves using the bludgeon of state power to suppress things Conservatives do not like.

DONALD J. TRUMP IS A SEDITIOUS TRAITOR AND MUST BE IMPEACHED
Lascaris
Padawan Learner
Posts: 229
Joined: 2008-08-10 08:43am
Location: Rhodia, Nebular cluster

Re: SDN World 3 Commentary Thread II

Post by Lascaris »

Minister of Pigeonry wrote:
Raj Ahten wrote:
Meanwhile....
Chilitina's military was quietly ecoming more prepared for a fight, if neccesary. Army units along the Northern Border were upgrading their state of alert after Spain had pgraded its alert status. As far as most were concerned it was a routine measure to reasure Chilitina's new ally.

The fleet was positively a secret hub of activity though. A security clampdown at naval facilities had been followed by orders to ready as many warships as possible to go to sea. Cruisers, submarines and some destroyers had already been dispatched on more patrols than usual since the "Brazilian incident." Many sailors now guessed whatever was coming was why they had been spending weeks overhauling their ships and getting as many as possible ready for action no matter what the regular maintenance timetables said. The rumors flying around the bunk rooms were many and varied. Perhaps they were going to get the Brazilians back for their little stunt during the freedom conference? Others said it was only a giant drill. Maybe it had something to do with the German and spanish fleets leaving port? No one really knew yet.
Shortly after Uruguay went to RedCon Orange. :D
Somehow I can't find this in the story thread so will treat it as one more DISNA's success :P
Locked