At the current per unit cost of $138 million USD per F-22 Raptor, the purchase of 24 of the fighters alone would approximately half of this nation's GDP (assuming full price was paid). In addition, the Qudlivun Free State is concerned by the implied precedent set since it wasn't authorized jet fighters in its initial equipment outlay but a nation with a lower post count would be.Stas Bush wrote:The Secretary General is alarmed at the fact the Grand Duchy of Baal wields 24 F-22 Raptors, and immediately raises the following question on the 1st Grand Conference of Nations:
EDIT: This section was written before I noticed it had been addressed by other posters.
The Qudlivun Free State would like to open negotiations with said nation since they obviously offer great discounts on modern weaponry and technology.Stas Bush wrote:1) Who sold to Duchy of Baal advanced arms far beyond it's means.
It is the firm belief of the Qudlivun Free State that no nation should possess weapons of mass destruction and that no purpose is served by them other than continue the unnecessary arms race. As a poorer nation surrounded by much larger powers and huge, conflicting military alliances, we are forced to devote a large amount of our already stretched resources to defending against the apparently inevitable exchanges of WMDs or obtain our own as a deterrent to their use.Stas Bush wrote:2) What rules shall we make regarding arms proliferation - free arms exports? Even if nukes or WMDs are exported to small states?
Given our nation's stated neutrality in regards to these military alliances in what may be a vain attempt to provide a truly neutral meeting place for all nations as well as provide a home for truly international aid agencies, we cannot in good conscience arm ourselves with such weapons and must instead work to create a solely defensive deterrent such as land based missile interceptors or ground based lasers.
The Qudlivun Free State hereby proposes a temporary halt to military acquisitions by all nations for the purpose of review and determination by the august body as to the appropriateness of all weapon developments and technologies. If such a measure has already been offered by another nation we will support said measure.Stas Bush wrote:What say you, other honourable delegates of this great body?
We would also like to reaffirm our position on the Law of the Sea that we still agree with the setting of territorial and contiguous zone water marks be set at the 22 and 44 nautical mile marks.