If a hypothetical scenario is defined in a manner which makes no sense, that is a pointless argument. That is certainly the case here: if this "incontrovertible proof" is scientific in nature, then logically, it should be possible to conduct research into it. And given the original nature of Christian mythology (as opposed to the modern New Age Hollywood version of it), angels and demons probably aren't really as formidable as they're made out to be. The only really awe-inspiring feats described in the Bible are committed before the narrator himself (Moses) is even born, hence they are all hearsay even in a Biblical context.Zuul wrote:I like the idea, it is just obviously not in the spirit of the OP.
And logically, if this proof were of the "spiritual" or "revelatory" variety rather than the scientific variety, then it would have no real effect on society at all. People would just shrug and ignore it, because we are bombarded with non-physical "proofs" of Heaven and Hell all the time.