Anti-gay marriage arguments

DPDarkPrimus · Post by **DPDarkPrimus** » 2005-06-09 05:10pm

sparrowtm wrote:
Dalton wrote:I believe that there are no justifiable arguments against gay marriage.
How about this one: "Married gay couples would enjoy the same tax benefits as heterosexual couples, but aren't able to contribute to society by producing future tax payers a.k.a. children."

A former friend of mine used that quote. While still invalid, it is at least more creative than the american fundie-blahshit.

Creative... how? The same "argument" would apply to a heterosexual couple with an infertile partner, as well as a heterosexual couple who do not plan on ever having children.

DPDarkPrimus · Post by **DPDarkPrimus** » 2005-06-09 05:12pm

Plekhanov wrote:One last thing the APA’s FAQ on sexual orientation link gives very brief but comprehensive rebuttals to claims that gay parents either make bad parents or are more likely to raise gay children.

Oh, but the APA doesn't use valid studies, and it's being manipulated for the gay agenda.

That's right, the APA is an invalid source according to these homophobic retards.

Plekhanov · Post by **Plekhanov** » 2005-06-09 05:24pm

DPDarkPrimus wrote:
Plekhanov wrote:One last thing the APA’s FAQ on sexual orientation link gives very brief but comprehensive rebuttals to claims that gay parents either make bad parents or are more likely to raise gay children.
Oh, but the APA doesn't use valid studies, and it's being manipulated for the gay agenda.

That's right, the APA is an invalid source according to these homophobic retards.

Hardcore homophobes will no doubt take that line in which case just insult them & move on there's no reasoning with such people. However APA type stuff can & does work on less close minded social conservative types & undecideds so it still has value.

Pint0 Xtreme · Post by **Pint0 Xtreme** » 2005-06-09 05:34pm

DPDarkPrimus wrote:
Plekhanov wrote:One last thing the APA’s FAQ on sexual orientation link gives very brief but comprehensive rebuttals to claims that gay parents either make bad parents or are more likely to raise gay children.
Oh, but the APA doesn't use valid studies, and it's being manipulated for the gay agenda.

That's right, the APA is an invalid source according to these homophobic retards.

Yes, and every other medical association who agrees with the APA have been taken over by gays too.

DPDarkPrimus · Post by **DPDarkPrimus** » 2005-06-09 06:08pm

Pint0 Xtreme wrote:
DPDarkPrimus wrote:
Plekhanov wrote:One last thing the APA’s FAQ on sexual orientation link gives very brief but comprehensive rebuttals to claims that gay parents either make bad parents or are more likely to raise gay children.
Oh, but the APA doesn't use valid studies, and it's being manipulated for the gay agenda.

That's right, the APA is an invalid source according to these homophobic retards.
Yes, and every other medical association who agrees with the APA have been taken over by gays too.

Can you give me a huge list? That would make good rebuttal material.

Boyish-Tigerlilly · Post by **Boyish-Tigerlilly** » 2005-06-09 07:23pm

Give a list of the medical associations who agree with the APA?

The AAA (American Anthropological Association). the APA (Psychiatric Association).

The San Fransisco Departement of Public Health and Web MD

Boyish-Tigerlilly · Post by **Boyish-Tigerlilly** » 2005-06-09 07:24pm

I have been told that the mainstream organizations like the two APA's, the San Fran, and the AAA are wrong because they are American sources and controlled by the vial captalists. Only SOviet Science and Eastern sources count.

wolveraptor · Post by **wolveraptor** » 2005-06-09 11:06pm

Number 1, what's wrong if Gay parents raise gay children? I'd only be worried about that if humanity was dangerously underpopulated, and that we needed children to be born, but hey, we're DEFINITELY not there.

Gil Hamilton · Post by **Gil Hamilton** » 2005-06-09 11:25pm

the .303 bookworm wrote:How about "If G-d wanted slot A to go into slot B then it should, but it doesnt so it's wrong", good enough?

*ahem* Which Slot B?

The Grim Squeaker · Post by **The Grim Squeaker** » 2005-06-10 12:17am

the .303 bookworm wrote:
How about "If G-d wanted slot A to go into slot B then it should, but it doesnt so it's wrong", good enough?

*ahem* Which Slot B? Very Happy

"Slot B aint the problem, Slot C on the other hand is for Output, no Input"
And slot O should be left well enough alone.

Gil Hamilton · Post by **Gil Hamilton** » 2005-06-10 03:12am

the .303 bookworm wrote:"Slot B aint the problem, Slot C on the other hand is for Output, no Input"
And slot O should be left well enough alone.

*cough* If it fits, it's an input.

The Grim Squeaker · Post by **The Grim Squeaker** » 2005-06-10 03:22am

the .303 bookworm wrote:
"Slot B aint the problem, Slot C on the other hand is for Output, no Input"
And slot O should be left well enough alone. Wink

*cough* If it fits, it's an input. Laughing

One size fits all

VT-16 · Post by **VT-16** » 2005-06-10 05:55am

I'd only be worried about that if humanity was dangerously underpopulated, and that we needed children to be born

Gays aren´t incapable of reproducing, some even want to have kids, and will force themselves to reproductive activity if necessary. So the Fundies lose even that argument.

wolveraptor · Post by **wolveraptor** » 2005-06-10 04:40pm

I wonder what life would be like if we were all gay clones in the military, like Spartans.

Post by **Surlethe** » 2005-06-10 04:45pm

Plekhanov wrote:One last thing the APA’s FAQ on sexual orientation link gives very brief but comprehensive rebuttals to claims that gay parents either make bad parents or are more likely to raise gay children.

This is very helpful. Thank you.

Wolveraptor wrote:I wonder what life would be like if we were all gay clones in the military, like Spartans.

Boring?