Now to take it apart.
Nonsense. Either a baseball team will make the playoffs or it won't--there are only two possibilities, here. However, even if we assume that all the teams are equally good they do NOT have a 50:50 chance of making the playoffs because less than half the teams make the playoffs.1. The probably of God's existence is one in two. That is, God either exists or doesn't.
Similarly, the chances that God exists or not are not necessarily one-in-two.
WTF? He applies the exact same fallacy again. When faced with two possibilities, the two options are NOT NECESSARILY EQUALLY LIKELY.2. The probability that God became incarnate, that is embodied in human form, is also one in two.
1. What "evidence" does this refer to?3. The evidence for God's existence is an argument for the resurrection.
2. No it's not. There's no reason why the existence of God should necessarily be proof of a resurrection event.
How does he figure?4. The chance of Christ's resurrection not being reported by the gospels has a probability of one in 10.
WHAT. THE. FLYING. FUCK.5. Considering all these factors together, there is a one in 1,000 chance that the resurrection is not true.
This drivel simply cannot be taken seriously. He can't even do the math correctly after making up all of this bullshit logic.