Einstein's Riddle?

SLAM: debunk creationism, pseudoscience, and superstitions. Discuss logic and morality.

Moderator: Alyrium Denryle

User avatar
InnerBrat
CLIT Commander
Posts: 7469
Joined: 2002-11-26 11:02am
Location: In my own mind.
Contact:

Post by InnerBrat »

It wasn't that hard - but i used to do this kind of puzzle for fun when I was a kid. Took me about 20minutes, but I wasn't working very hard. Didn't draw up a grid or anything, because it didn't need one.

I think more people could do it nowadays becasue we know how to tackle logic problems.
"I fight with love, and I laugh with rage, you gotta live light enough to see the humour and long enough to see some change" - Ani DiFranco, Pick Yer Nose

"Life 's not a song, life isn't bliss, life is just this: it's living." - Spike, Once More with Feeling
User avatar
Cromag
Padawan Learner
Posts: 184
Joined: 2002-07-05 12:23pm

Post by Cromag »

Zaia, I found pretty much the same thing you did on those sites. That is why I brought my search here, as there are more people here, apparently, that don't take something at face value. 8) Google turned up about 10 pages worth of hits, but they pretty much uniformly presented the riddle, gave the little backstory about the 2% thing and that was it.

I dunno about the idea that even back in his day so few people would be able to solve it. As I said in my first post, I'm very uncertain about the figure because 1) I don't believe Einstein would just pull a number like that from nowhere and 2) I also don't think he would waste his time on research to come up with that figure.

So, from whence does this puzzle come :?:
I was thinking of the immortal words of Socrates, when he said, "I drank what?" -- Chris Knight, Real Genius
User avatar
Zaia
Inamorata
Posts: 13983
Joined: 2002-10-23 03:04am
Location: Londontowne

Post by Zaia »

innerbrat wrote:It wasn't that hard - but i used to do this kind of puzzle for fun when I was a kid. Took me about 20minutes, but I wasn't working very hard. Didn't draw up a grid or anything, because it didn't need one.
Well, guess you just proved yourself to be more intelligent than I, since I took longer and needed a grid. Congrats. Hope that makes you feel good or something, since that's apparently what you were going for with that post.
"On the infrequent occasions when I have been called upon in a formal place to play the bongo drums, the introducer never seems to find it necessary to mention that I also do theoretical physics." -Richard Feynman
User avatar
Slartibartfast
Emperor's Hand
Posts: 6730
Joined: 2002-09-10 05:35pm
Location: Where The Sea Meets The Sky
Contact:

Re: Einstein's Riddle?

Post by Slartibartfast »

Cromag wrote:Who owns the fish?
There's no evidence that there's a fish at all.
Image
User avatar
ArmorPierce
Rabid Monkey
Posts: 5904
Joined: 2002-07-04 09:54pm
Location: Born and raised in Brooklyn, unfornately presently in Jersey

Post by ArmorPierce »

after quickly looking it over for about a minute I decided that it would take me to long to solve and I need my beuty sleep :oops:
Brotherhood of the Monkey @( !.! )@
To give anything less than your best is to sacrifice the gift. ~Steve Prefontaine
Aoccdrnig to rscheearch at an Elingsh uinervtisy, it deosn't mttaer in waht oredr the ltteers in a wrod are, the olny iprmoetnt tihng is taht frist and lsat ltteer are in the rghit pclae. The rset can be a toatl mses and you can sitll raed it wouthit a porbelm. Tihs is bcuseae we do not raed ervey lteter by it slef but the wrod as a wlohe.
User avatar
Slartibartfast
Emperor's Hand
Posts: 6730
Joined: 2002-09-10 05:35pm
Location: Where The Sea Meets The Sky
Contact:

Post by Slartibartfast »

Ok I read that there is a fish so the answer is the german, plus other stuff like the house he is and what he smokes, etc.
Image
Post Reply