Bush and Co. Warcrime Trial

SLAM: debunk creationism, pseudoscience, and superstitions. Discuss logic and morality.

Moderator: Alyrium Denryle

What should the Punishment be.

Life in prison
9
29%
Chaingang and Hard Labor
22
71%
 
Total votes: 31

User avatar
Aaron
Blackpowder Man
Posts: 12031
Joined: 2004-01-28 11:02pm
Location: British Columbian ExPat

Post by Aaron »

Knife wrote:
I think he's screwing up NCO and SNCO.
Thats possible for the record Junior NCOs are Cpl And Master Cpl, Senior NCOs are Sgt - Chief Warrent Officer.
M1891/30: A bad day on the range is better then a good day at work.
Image
User avatar
Mr Bean
Lord of Irony
Posts: 22459
Joined: 2002-07-04 08:36am

Post by Mr Bean »

Macross wrote:
CJvR wrote:
Stas Bush wrote:The only case they could be convicted would be a great revolution in America and a revolutionary trial is set in motion.
You can convict anyone of anything in a revolutionary court, thats the nice thing about them and the main reason you shouldn't expect justice from them.
True, and I cant help but draw parallels to the Saddam Hussein trial. Why hold his trial in Iraq, to be tried by the very people he is accused of victimizing? Hussein is an evil, ruthless dicatator who deserves to be tried and punished for his crimes, but why not turn him over to an International Criminal Tribunal, like what was done with Slobodan Milošević? I cant help but think that in an International Court of law, Hussein could have possibly won his case and that holding a trial in Iraq is the only way to guarantee a conviction.

This only bothers me because one of the reasons stated for going into Iraq was to "Spread Democracy, " one of the fundamental principles of democray the right to fair trial. Even Milošević, Ken Lay, and Nazi War Criminals all got fair trails. I find this whole situation to be hypocritical.
Slobodan did not get a fair trial, Slobodan got to hold his very own three ring media circus day in and day out and the "court" let him get away with it. He was there to drum up as much international support and attention as possible, not to acutaly defend himself aginst the charges that were placed aginst him.

But that gets back to a seperate aurgment between having Live Court TV and having a visual record of the trial aviable.

"A cult is a religion with no political power." -Tom Wolfe
Pardon me for sounding like a dick, but I'm playing the tiniest violin in the world right now-Dalton
munky99999
Redshirt
Posts: 42
Joined: 2006-05-16 01:09pm

Post by munky99999 »

Cpl Kendall wrote:
Knife wrote:
I think he's screwing up NCO and SNCO.
Thats possible for the record Junior NCOs are Cpl And Master Cpl, Senior NCOs are Sgt - Chief Warrent Officer.
I actually asked this to a captain in the CF military and he told me pte-sgt are ncm but some sgt might be in a NCO position. While the warrant officers are the non-commish. officers. I dont have a clue so I'm going to actually ask a very reputable place for clarification.
Hitler burned people like Anne Frank for being Jewish. For that, we call him evil. God burns Anne Frank for being Jewish, forever. For that, theists call him "good"
Image
User avatar
Aaron
Blackpowder Man
Posts: 12031
Joined: 2004-01-28 11:02pm
Location: British Columbian ExPat

Post by Aaron »

munky99999 wrote: I actually asked this to a captain in the CF military and he told me pte-sgt are ncm but some sgt might be in a NCO position. While the warrant officers are the non-commish. officers. I dont have a clue so I'm going to actually ask a very reputable place for clarification.
You can take me at my word, I used to be a Cpl in the CF. The Captain is wrong. Pte is NCM, Cpl and Master Cpl are Junior NCOs and Sgt - Chief Warrent Officer are Senior NCOs.
M1891/30: A bad day on the range is better then a good day at work.
Image
User avatar
Knife
Emperor's Hand
Posts: 15769
Joined: 2002-08-30 02:40pm
Location: Behind the Zion Curtain

Post by Knife »

Cpl Kendall wrote:
munky99999 wrote: I actually asked this to a captain in the CF military and he told me pte-sgt are ncm but some sgt might be in a NCO position. While the warrant officers are the non-commish. officers. I dont have a clue so I'm going to actually ask a very reputable place for clarification.
You can take me at my word, I used to be a Cpl in the CF. The Captain is wrong. Pte is NCM, Cpl and Master Cpl are Junior NCOs and Sgt - Chief Warrent Officer are Senior NCOs.
I have no idea how the Canuks do it, but I'll take your word on it. E-4 through E-5 are NCO's or jr. NCO's. E-6 through E-9's are considered Staff level non commisioned officers. Warrent Officers are a different breed since they have a commision via a warrent (really meaningless in the US system but it originates from the English and the King/Queen giving a dude a warrent for his commision).
They say, "the tree of liberty must be watered with the blood of tyrants and patriots." I suppose it never occurred to them that they are the tyrants, not the patriots. Those weapons are not being used to fight some kind of tyranny; they are bringing them to an event where people are getting together to talk. -Mike Wong

But as far as board culture in general, I do think that young male overaggression is a contributing factor to the general atmosphere of hostility. It's not SOS and the Mess throwing hand grenades all over the forum- Red
User avatar
Ma Deuce
Sith Marauder
Posts: 4359
Joined: 2004-02-02 03:22pm
Location: Whitby, Ontario

Post by Ma Deuce »

Omega-185 wrote:No, it is banned by Geneva but the US didn't sign that part.
It is not banned outright by any treaty, even ones to which the US is not a signatory. And while WP is primarly used for smoke and illumination purposes, it's use as an incindiary weapon is only prohibited against civilians or military targets in close proximity to civilians acording to Protocol III of the Convention on Certain Conventional Weapons.

The only WP munitions the US has are either classified as smoke or illumination rounds, providing a convenient loophole, as Protocol III does not classify smoke and illumiation rounds as incindiaries even though they have "incidental" incindieary effects: And while the WP illumination rounds certainly could be used with great effect as incindiaries, I doubt you could actually prove in court that it was deployed specifically for incindiary purposes rather than for illumination, even if the former was in fact the case.
Image
The M2HB: The Greatest Machinegun Ever Made.
HAB: Crew-Served Weapons Specialist


"Making fun of born-again Christians is like hunting dairy cows with a high powered rifle and scope." --P.J. O'Rourke

"A man who has nothing for which he is willing to fight, nothing which is more important than his own personal safety, is a miserable creature and has no chance of being free unless made and kept so by the exertions of better men than himself." --J.S. Mill
User avatar
Aaron
Blackpowder Man
Posts: 12031
Joined: 2004-01-28 11:02pm
Location: British Columbian ExPat

Post by Aaron »

Knife wrote:
I have no idea how the Canuks do it, but I'll take your word on it. E-4 through E-5 are NCO's or jr. NCO's. E-6 through E-9's are considered Staff level non commisioned officers. Warrent Officers are a different breed since they have a commision via a warrent (really meaningless in the US system but it originates from the English and the King/Queen giving a dude a warrent for his commision).
Well we have three levels of Pte so what would be your E-1 through E-3 would be NCMs for us.
M1891/30: A bad day on the range is better then a good day at work.
Image
Post Reply