Debating stupid claims, outside the net

SLAM: debunk creationism, pseudoscience, and superstitions. Discuss logic and morality.

Moderator: Alyrium Denryle

User avatar
Darth Wong
Sith Lord
Sith Lord
Posts: 70028
Joined: 2002-07-03 12:25am
Location: Toronto, Canada
Contact:

Post by Darth Wong »

Teleros wrote:
Style over Substance is one of the worst fallacies
Yet as this thread shows, it's a winner in face-to-face debates.

So any tips that don't rely on rhetorical skills, fallacies and whatnot? We've had humour etc earlier on in the thread, but any other tips?
It's really hard to recommend tactics for debating against a skilled, experienced public debater effectively that are also impeccably honest. Public debating is a circus and that isn't going to change. The only way to elevate the level of discourse is to demand a written debate.
Image
"It's not evil for God to do it. Or for someone to do it at God's command."- Jonathan Boyd on baby-killing

"you guys are fascinated with the use of those "rules of logic" to the extent that you don't really want to discussus anything."- GC

"I do not believe Russian Roulette is a stupid act" - Embracer of Darkness

"Viagra commercials appear to save lives" - tharkûn on US health care.

http://www.stardestroyer.net/Mike/RantMode/Blurbs.html
Post Reply