Napoleon the Clown wrote:How do you plan to do this?
I don't. But if I did, I'd increase the pressure in the surrounding environment accordingly.
Well, you did say something about heating the object...
Yes, I did. What about it?
And how do you plan on getting enough extra mass into the system? It takes an enormous amount of energy (of whatever sort you please) to make even one gram of mass. Remember, E=MC^2? .001 x C^2 is still a huge fucking number. I'll calculate it, if you like.
Short answer is I don't. Hence, "it does not avail you of accounting for the masses and distances necessary to generate a desired surface gravity and its gradient." You'll need to pump up the internal energy of the system by 10^16 J to get an additional kilogram of mass.
Heating will make it's volume and surface area increase.
Not in an isometric process. Remember, the relation is PV = U, where U is the internal energy of the system, P is it's internal pressure, and V is its volume. It's easy to show that you can vary P independently of V.
And I would like to know how you'll manage to keep the volume constant.
By applying pressure externally or choosing a material with a high enough tensile strength to resist expanding at that temperature.
Because the amount of energy you'll need to dump in to make enough mass to do jack shit is going to bleed off into any surounding materials, no matter how high their specific heat capacity.
Undoubtedly, but the point of this whole exercise was to show how absurd a magical electricity to mass converter is. Like you pointed out, the whole setup consumes a whole lot of electrical power. And in the end, you have the same amount of mass you'd find classically for the desired surface gravity and gradient.