The One Laptop Per Child program

SLAM: debunk creationism, pseudoscience, and superstitions. Discuss logic and morality.

Moderator: Alyrium Denryle

User avatar
Spyder
Sith Marauder
Posts: 4465
Joined: 2002-09-03 03:23am
Location: Wellington, New Zealand
Contact:

Post by Spyder »

One thing which occurs to me is that a lot of these people probably don't realise how the first world lives compared to them and that our lifestyle is largely dependant on their labour. There may be some interesting long term consequences if they manage to get internet connections running.

Not that I'm saying this is a bad thing.
:D
User avatar
wolveraptor
Sith Marauder
Posts: 4042
Joined: 2004-12-18 06:09pm

Post by wolveraptor »

Spyder wrote:One thing which occurs to me is that a lot of these people probably don't realise how the first world lives compared to them and that our lifestyle is largely dependant on their labour. There may be some interesting long term consequences if they manage to get internet connections running.

Not that I'm saying this is a bad thing.
These people aren't completely cut off from the world. I don't have direct evidence to back this up, but it seems to me that many people in 3rd world countries view industrialized countries as rather opulent places. That's usually the portrayal in the news and stuff, anyways. I guess I can't say for sure if that's true, but it seems like a reasonable proposition, given that the prime export of the west to the 3rd world is media, all of which emphasizes our riches.
User avatar
phongn
Rebel Leader
Posts: 18487
Joined: 2002-07-03 11:11pm

Post by phongn »

Anecdotally, many in the Third World do think the industrialized world as incredibly opulent.
User avatar
Gunface
Redshirt
Posts: 5
Joined: 2006-11-21 07:30pm
Location: Ohio D:

Post by Gunface »

This is a whole bunch of claptrap. Just give 'em an abacus, some paper, and a pencil. They can do basically the same thing.
User avatar
Lisa
Jedi Knight
Posts: 790
Joined: 2006-07-14 11:59am
Location: Trenton
Contact:

Post by Lisa »

I've been against the program for a while now, for a number of reasons, many already stated. This program is a solution that is waiting for it's problem to come. the money would be better spent industrializing their agraculture and then creating a manufacturing base with the labourers that are no longer needed in the fields.
Teaching basic literacy. Now in second world countries this may be a tool that could be used but it would hardly end poverty.
May you live in interesting times.
Post Reply