Letter to the editor

SLAM: debunk creationism, pseudoscience, and superstitions. Discuss logic and morality.

Moderator: Alyrium Denryle

User avatar
FSTargetDrone
Emperor's Hand
Posts: 7878
Joined: 2004-04-10 06:10pm
Location: Drone HQ, Pennsylvania, USA

Post by FSTargetDrone »

DavidEC wrote:General tips: Once you have written your letter, go back over it and ruthlessly eliminate any words which are not necessary, and find phrases and combinations to keep your letter length as short as possible. It could be something as simple as 'our children's fragile minds' instead of 'the fragile minds of our children'. Every bit counts because editors like quick, soundbitey letters which don't hog too many column inches.

Can I suggest some alterations SCrawl?
Those are good tips, to be sure, but:
SCRawl wrote:Thanks for weighing in, folks. The deed is done; I've submitted it using a (believable) pseudonym. This all becomes much ado about nothing, though, if they don't print the letter. I half-suspect that dozens of people have submitted essentially the same letter, so mine might get bumped for that reason.
Image
User avatar
DavidEC
Padawan Learner
Posts: 268
Joined: 2007-10-18 02:29pm
Location: London, UK

Post by DavidEC »

Oops. Should read more of the thread before responding. Still, hopefully we'll have a second opportunity - the British newspapers at the moment are filled with "Christian foundations of society" bullshit provoked by a court ruling over Jerry Springer: The Opera.

Telegraph letters... today. Commence mockery.
"Show me a commie pilot with some initiative, and I'll show you a Foxbat in Japan."
User avatar
SCRawl
Has a bad feeling about this.
Posts: 4191
Joined: 2002-12-24 03:11pm
Location: Burlington, Canada

Post by SCRawl »

Good thought, DavidEC, but as has been pointed out, the letter has been submitted. The paper did e-mail me back, requesting my real name, address, and phone number, and I provided them. I judge that if they're to print the letter, it will be Sunday or Wednesday, as they only publish three days per week.

(Just in case someone might have gotten the idea that this is a real newspaper, well, let's just say that it's not quite up to the London Telegraph's standards. It's delivered to most residences in Burlington (a city of around 160k people), and focuses on local events. In other words, it's a very local newspaper.)
73% of all statistics are made up, including this one.

I'm waiting as fast as I can.
User avatar
FSTargetDrone
Emperor's Hand
Posts: 7878
Joined: 2004-04-10 06:10pm
Location: Drone HQ, Pennsylvania, USA

Post by FSTargetDrone »

SCRawl wrote:Good thought, DavidEC, but as has been pointed out, the letter has been submitted. The paper did e-mail me back, requesting my real name, address, and phone number, and I provided them. I judge that if they're to print the letter, it will be Sunday or Wednesday, as they only publish three days per week.
As mentioned above, most newspapers require your contact information when writing to the editors. If nothing else, it's to confirm that you did indeed send them a letter and not someone else claiming to be you. I imagine you could simply ask to have your identity hidden upon publication for any number of reasons and they should accommodate you.
Image
User avatar
Davey
Padawan Learner
Posts: 368
Joined: 2007-11-25 04:17pm
Location: WTF? Check the directory!

Post by Davey »

Reading your post, I find it really really hilarious how religious nuts always say, "Oh ya, my religion is a religion of peace, benevolence and tolerance," and yet, the moment you say something against it, they wouldn't stop at killing you.
"Oh SHIT!" generally means I fucked up.
Image
User avatar
SCRawl
Has a bad feeling about this.
Posts: 4191
Joined: 2002-12-24 03:11pm
Location: Burlington, Canada

Post by SCRawl »

Two days after I officially gave up hope, they printed my letter. The editorial staff has some cojones after all.
73% of all statistics are made up, including this one.

I'm waiting as fast as I can.
User avatar
Hawkwings
Sith Devotee
Posts: 3372
Joined: 2005-01-28 09:30pm
Location: USC, LA, CA

Post by Hawkwings »

They probably wanted to wait until after Christmas. With all the Christ and whatnot stuff going on.
User avatar
Lagmonster
Master Control Program
Master Control Program
Posts: 7719
Joined: 2002-07-04 09:53am
Location: Ottawa, Canada

Post by Lagmonster »

SCRawl wrote:Two days after I officially gave up hope, they printed my letter. The editorial staff has some cojones after all.
Controversy sells papers, when properly applied. Good for you that they printed it; now keep your eyes peeled for replies.
Note: I'm semi-retired from the board, so if you need something, please be patient.
User avatar
SCRawl
Has a bad feeling about this.
Posts: 4191
Joined: 2002-12-24 03:11pm
Location: Burlington, Canada

Post by SCRawl »

Lagmonster wrote:
SCRawl wrote:Two days after I officially gave up hope, they printed my letter. The editorial staff has some cojones after all.
Controversy sells papers, when properly applied. Good for you that they printed it; now keep your eyes peeled for replies.
Oh, I'll be keeping a close eye on the Editorial section. I'll keep SDN fully informed.
73% of all statistics are made up, including this one.

I'm waiting as fast as I can.
User avatar
Singular Intellect
Jedi Council Member
Posts: 2392
Joined: 2006-09-19 03:12pm
Location: Calgary, Alberta, Canada

Post by Singular Intellect »

SCRawl wrote:
Lagmonster wrote:
SCRawl wrote:Two days after I officially gave up hope, they printed my letter. The editorial staff has some cojones after all.
Controversy sells papers, when properly applied. Good for you that they printed it; now keep your eyes peeled for replies.
Oh, I'll be keeping a close eye on the Editorial section. I'll keep SDN fully informed.
Sweet. I love it, and look forward to the replies it'll invoke! :lol:
Post Reply