-Given the above, strategies such as attracting men by being a blond bombshell aren't allowed. However, the usefulness of being a blond bombshell does tend to mitigate the impact of being more intelligent.
Mr. Wong:
-I was hoping someone here might be familiar with the science regarding the correlation of intelligence in successful marriages. I haven't reviewed the literature myself.
-In your example, the guy with 160 IQ could compete for the bus driver's job if that job were highly desirable. Having that option is a significant advantage when jobs (or resources in general) are limited.Nova Andromeda wrote:I'm just wondering what 'evolutionary strategies' could be used successfully within a species when your competition is significantly smarter than you (the assumption is that interbreeding is possible). If that strategy happens to be moral all the better.Darth Wong wrote:What makes you think you'd be competing in the same arenas? Obviously, somebody with an IQ or 90 is not going to be competing with a genius for the job of theoretical mathematician. And guess what: the guy with the IQ of 160 would find a job as a bus driver to be absolutely intolerable. There's no reason why people of greatly unequal intelligence must be "competing" directly against each other.
Brian:
-I don't know where you get the idea that I think smart people don't like dumb people on principle. The idea is that people will look after their own interests first when crunch time arrives. All things being equal, smarter people will win this contest.
-I haven't entirely rejected the marriage idea. However, I haven't been convinced it's going to work either.