Well this "Yahweh/Jehova/Fucktard" asshat can go suicide-fuck himself on the particle-beam jet of a neutron star! What a racist donkey-fucking spawn of a syphilitic turdfucker!
...racist?
Im thinking rascist. when youve got jesus splitting groups into children and dogs, it's not a good thing. mark 7:27 or so.
Here's what my Annotated Bible has to say:
Mark 7.27-28: To Jesus' insistence that the manifestation of the kingdom (food) is primarily for the Israelites (children), she gives a reply that wins the debate
Given that Jesus was fully human (and thus fallible), it's possible that at this time he still believed that he had come only to redeem the Israelites, who were considered the children of Abraham and thus the chosen nation of God. This seems to mark a turning point in his ministry, when he began reaching towards the Gentiles rather than the Jews who rejected him.
Stanley Hauerwas wrote:[W]hy is it that no one is angry at the inequality of income in this country? I mean, the inequality of income is unbelievable. Unbelievable. Why isn’t that ever an issue of politics? Because you don’t live in a democracy. You live in a plutocracy. Money rules.
Regarding Genesis 38:8-10, the Jewish law mandated that if a husband died without a male heir, his brother was obliged to father a son with the widow, and the boy would be counted the son of the dead man. Onan did not want to father a boy who would legally his nephew and not his son, so he "pulled out" to prevent pregnancy. The only time masturbation is explicitly mentioned, the only injunction is that the man must ritually cleanse himself, as he would after ejaculating under any circumstance. The problem is most Christians cannot understand their own sacred text.
And I couldn't make it past the second the comic. Surely they don't believe that teenage "sinners" are going to be converted by that tripe?
Im thinking rascist. when youve got jesus splitting groups into children and dogs, it's not a good thing. mark 7:27 or so.
Here's what my Annotated Bible has to say:
Mark 7.27-28: To Jesus' insistence that the manifestation of the kingdom (food) is primarily for the Israelites (children), she gives a reply that wins the debate
Given that Jesus was fully human (and thus fallible), it's possible that at this time he still believed that he had come only to redeem the Israelites, who were considered the children of Abraham and thus the chosen nation of God. This seems to mark a turning point in his ministry, when he began reaching towards the Gentiles rather than the Jews who rejected him.
and if you follow the christian doctrine, he's fully god, too, which means we're really screwed.
This day is Fantastic!
Myers Briggs: ENTJ
Political Compass: -3/-6 DOOMerWoW
"I really hate it when the guy you were pegging as Mr. Worst Case starts saying, "Oh, I was wrong, it's going to be much worse." " - Adrian Laguna
My favorite line is when the protagonist of one of the strips proclaims, "Hey! Little bro's coming with me! I want him to witness that Christians have fun too!" To which one of his friends replies, "Oh come on Jason-get serious!"
And then of course we polarize into factions wherein Christians are accused of subscribing to a fundamentally racist religion, and atheists are accused of being inherently flawed or sin filled. Humans are such delicious creatures.
The Dark wrote:Here's what my Annotated Bible has to say:
Mark 7.27-28: To Jesus' insistence that the manifestation of the kingdom (food) is primarily for the Israelites (children), she gives a reply that wins the debate
Given that Jesus was fully human (and thus fallible), it's possible that at this time he still believed that he had come only to redeem the Israelites, who were considered the children of Abraham and thus the chosen nation of God. This seems to mark a turning point in his ministry, when he began reaching towards the Gentiles rather than the Jews who rejected him.
and if you follow the christian doctrine, he's fully god, too, which means we're really screwed.
True, fully human and fully God. To be honest, I don't fully understand that doctrine yet. I think it means (practically speaking) that Jesus had full knowledge of God's intentions, but not necessarily the entire plan or events that would happen. I only got a B in Basic Christian Beliefs. I'm certain that's going to get me some extra things to work on before full ordination.
Stanley Hauerwas wrote:[W]hy is it that no one is angry at the inequality of income in this country? I mean, the inequality of income is unbelievable. Unbelievable. Why isn’t that ever an issue of politics? Because you don’t live in a democracy. You live in a plutocracy. Money rules.