Fusors / Inertial Electrostatic Confinement reactors

SLAM: debunk creationism, pseudoscience, and superstitions. Discuss logic and morality.

Moderator: Alyrium Denryle

Post Reply
User avatar
kojikun
BANNED
Posts: 9663
Joined: 2002-07-04 12:23am
Contact:

Fusors / Inertial Electrostatic Confinement reactors

Post by kojikun »

What does everyone think of these? They can fuse Deuterium fuel with less input energy then Toks or standard Inertial Confinement. Incase you don't know wtf I'm talking about, heres a few links

fusor.net (more a wankfest then a serious website)
http://www.farnovision.com/chronicles/f ... latos.html (another wankfest but with more theory and info)

http://www.richmond.infi.net/%7Erhull/highenergy002.htm (Richard Hulls website, hes a big IEC amateur tester)
http://www.belljar.net/634fusor.pdf (article by Mr. Hull)

http://fti.neep.wisc.edu/iec/MainPage/ftisite1.htm (University of Wisconsin IEC lab homepage)

Opinions? Personally I think with more work it might actually be the best hope for fusion power. Megnetic confinement is so costly when it comes to input energy and ICF hasn't proven to be cheap enough..
Sì! Abbiamo un' anima! Ma è fatta di tanti piccoli robot.
User avatar
Admiral Valdemar
Outside Context Problem
Posts: 31572
Joined: 2002-07-04 07:17pm
Location: UK

Post by Admiral Valdemar »

So, without really reading the articles, does this mean they can break-even on the power input : output ratio? Do we potentially have a working fusion reactor here?
User avatar
jaeger115
Rabid Monkey
Posts: 1222
Joined: 2002-12-29 04:39pm
Location: In the dark corridor, behind you

Post by jaeger115 »

Umm, why are you posting these if you know they're mostly wankfests? :|
Concession accepted - COMMENCE PRIMARY IGNITION
Elite Warrior Monk of SD.net
BotM. Demolition Monkey
"I don't believe in God, any more than I believe in Mother Goose." - Clarence Darrow
HAB Special-Ops and Counter-Intelligence Agent
User avatar
kojikun
BANNED
Posts: 9663
Joined: 2002-07-04 12:23am
Contact:

Post by kojikun »

no, they havent broken even yet. but they have the highest input-output that i know of. *edit* theres some reports that Farnsworth was able to achieve self sustained fusion for 30 some odd seconds which, if true, makes IEC the only design capable of doing so (other then stars :))

and im posting them because their technical info isnt bad, just the whole technology "ignored for decades" and "betrayed scientist" thing makes it seem more like Alex Chiu then anything else. Thats not to say its incorrect (after all, the race to nuclear fission plants was heated and GA etc didnt need competition from fusion that was cheaper)

but it makes it soap-operaish.
Sì! Abbiamo un' anima! Ma è fatta di tanti piccoli robot.
NapoleonGH
Jedi Master
Posts: 1090
Joined: 2002-07-08 02:25pm
Location: NJ, USA
Contact:

Post by NapoleonGH »

last i heard the PPPL claimed the title of the closest Input:Output ratio. Also claiming the title for the longest self sustained fusion reaction
User avatar
kojikun
BANNED
Posts: 9663
Joined: 2002-07-04 12:23am
Contact:

Post by kojikun »

PPPL can go suck one. Bastards dont even have an IEC reactor! LOL :)
Sì! Abbiamo un' anima! Ma è fatta di tanti piccoli robot.
Post Reply