I'M REALLY AM A F&#@#ING PRICK!

Post by **Gandalf** » 2003-02-28 11:55pm

If he trult is apologising can we get him to exact some sort of penance.

But then again, he might be going undercover here to corce us all to his cause...

David · Post by **David** » 2003-03-01 12:00am

He uses aol, so it's hard to tell.

Stuart Mackey · Post by **Stuart Mackey** » 2003-03-01 12:01am

David wrote:He uses aol, so it's hard to tell.

*snigger* and what does that tell us? {no offence to reputable AOL users}

RedImperator · Post by **RedImperator** » 2003-03-01 12:19am

Sure, give him the benefit of the doubt. If he's sincere, then hooray. If not, banish the hatfucker to the Hall of Shame for being a doofus AND a liar.

Post by **Darth Wong** » 2003-03-01 12:45am

Everyone has the benefit of the doubt. Everyone has the option to start posting intelligent material. This board has several members who have successfully shed bad titles not by apologizing or grovelling (regardless of whether we thought it was sincere or sarcastic), but by moving on to post material which forced a re-evaluation.

In short, I am perfectly willing to re-title if the Ambassador starts making intelligent or interesting points, or at least just asking intelligent questions (ie- questions that indicate he's been looking into this matter instead of just searching icr.org and mindlessly buying into every argument sold by that house of stupidity and lies without a shred of critical analysis). That would settle the question of whether he's being sincere or sarcastic.

Asst. Asst. Lt. Cmdr. Smi · Post by **Asst. Asst. Lt. Cmdr. Smi** » 2003-03-02 01:36pm

I say we give him the benefit of the doubt, and assume that he has changed. If he remains semi-active without making a fool of himself, his title can be revoked until he does something worthy of an FM title again. Just because his concession was immature doesn't mean he should continue to be flamed because of that.