Scientists expand DNA alphabet in living Organism

SLAM: debunk creationism, pseudoscience, and superstitions. Discuss logic and morality.

Moderator: Alyrium Denryle

Post Reply
User avatar
The Grim Squeaker
Emperor's Hand
Posts: 10315
Joined: 2005-06-01 01:44am
Location: A different time-space Continuum
Contact:

Scientists expand DNA alphabet in living Organism

Post by The Grim Squeaker »

Augmenting the Genetic Alphabet wrote: SOURCE
Living organisms have two sets of DNA base pairs—adenine paired with thymine and cytosine paired with guanine—that together encode the 20 amino acids used to make proteins in the cell. Now, scientists at The Scripps Research Institute (TSRI) in La Jolla, California, have introduced a synthetic base pair to Escherichia coli, greatly expanding the information DNA is able encode. DNA containing the novel base pair can replicate within the bacteria, according to a paper published today (May 7) in Nature. The work advances the goal of creating cells with synthetic DNA elements that can produce proteins made with an expanded set of amino acids.

“This is the first paper to show the possibility that living organisms can have really artificial DNA with [an] expanded genetic alphabet,” Ichiro Hirao, a synthetic biologist at the RIKEN Center for Life Science Technologies in Japan, wrote in an e-mail to The Scientist. Hirao was not involved in the study, but is also working to incorporate synthetic base pairs into living organisms.

“What we’ve done is successfully finally gotten a cell that stably harbors increased genetic information,” said study coauthor Floyd Romesberg, a synthetic biologist at TSRI. “What we want to do next, and what my lab is already working on, is . . . to retrieve that information.”

With the help of more than a dozen graduate students and postdocs, Romesberg spent the last 15 years synthesizing and testing 300 artificial nucleotides to determine which would make the most stable and replicable pair. Like natural nucleotides, the synthetic nucleotides each consist of a five-carbon sugar, a phosphate group, and a base. But unlike natural bases that allow nucleotides to pair through hydrogen bonds, the artificial bases sometimes rely on different chemistry. The researchers eventually settled on using artificial nucleotides that bind through hydrophobic interactions. The different chemistries between the natural and synthetic nucleotides prevent them from mispairing with one another. The researchers were able to incorporate an artificial base pair into DNA and to replicate the synthetic DNA in a test tube.

The next challenge was to incorporate artificial base pairs into DNA that would replicate inside a living cell. The researchers inserted DNA with unnatural nucleotides into plasmids, which were readily taken up by E. coli. But they still had to figure out how to feed the cells new, unnatural nucleotides so they could replicate the DNA.

Nucleotides within DNA contain one phosphate group. But before being incorporated into replicating DNA, they must have two additional phosphates. These extra phosphates are removed as the nucleotide is added to the DNA, providing energy to power the reaction. At first the researchers thought that, within E. coli, all three phosphate groups might be added to a sugar and unnatural base, called a nucleoside. But after struggling to create nucleoside triphosphates within the cell, the researchers hit upon a new approach.

Certain intracellular bacteria and organelles within algae do not create their own nucleotides. Rather, they import key nucleoside triphosphates from their environments via membrane transport proteins.
Romesberg and colleagues tested various triphosphate transporters and eventually found that one, from a plastid in a diatom, could import synthetic triphosphates into E. coli. They added a gene for the transporter to E. coli on a plasmid and optimized the cells’ food so that they would ingest the triphosphates.

Romesberg thought that multiple additional challenges remained, including getting the cell’s DNA polymerases to recognize and replicate the base pairs and preventing the cell’s DNA repair mechanisms from recognizing the novel nucleotides as aberrant. But, much to the team’s surprise, the unnatural plasmids immediately began to replicate.


“Once we had the triphosphates in the cell, then we really thought that our work would begin, but quite surprisingly it worked the first time,” Romesberg said.

The E. coli continued to replicate plasmids containing synthetic DNA as long as they were fed triphosphates.
The bacteria only slowly lost their synthetic base pairs after their synthetic triphosphate food was removed.

The team has arranged “an extremely clever way to avoid the problem of engineering a metabolism to make [triphosphates],” said Steven Benner, a synthetic biologist at the Foundation for Applied Molecular Evolution in Gainesville, Florida, who was not involved in the study.

Romesberg and his colleagues are now working to get RNA polymerases to transcribe the novel DNA into mRNAs. Then they hope to engineer cells to transcribe tRNAs that will read novel codons and translate novel amino acid sequences into proteins. Romesberg suggested that synthetic biologists will eventually build proteins with both natural amino acids currently not used in proteins and amino acids synthesized in the lab. He added that Synthorx, a company created based on his work, and of which he was scientific founder, aims to ramp up the production of synthetic triphosphates.

Benner acknowledged that this work is an important step toward creating unnatural proteins within cells, which was considered a longshot by some.

“The fact that [Romesberg] used triphosphate import and managed to avoid the degradation of the triphosphates—this is an idea we wish we had ourselves,” Benner said.

D.A. Malyshev et al., “A semi-synthetic organism with an expanded genetic alphabet,” Nature, doi:10.1038/nature13314, 2014.
Aaand Nature letters abstract:
A semi-synthetic organism with an expanded genetic alphabet wrote: Organisms are defined by the information encoded in their genomes, and since the origin of life this information has been encoded using a two-base-pair genetic alphabet (A–T and G–C). In vitro, the alphabet has been expanded to include several unnatural base pairs (UBPs)1, 2, 3.
We have developed a class of UBPs formed between nucleotides bearing hydrophobic nucleobases, exemplified by the pair formed between d5SICS and dNaM (d5SICS–dNaM), which is efficiently PCR-amplified1 and transcribed4, 5 in vitro, and whose unique mechanism of replication has been characterized6, 7. However, expansion of an organism’s genetic alphabet presents new and unprecedented challenges: the unnatural nucleoside triphosphates must be available inside the cell; endogenous polymerases must be able to use the unnatural triphosphates to faithfully replicate DNA containing the UBP within the complex cellular milieu; and finally, the UBP must be stable in the presence of pathways that maintain the integrity of DNA. Here we show that an exogenously expressed algal nucleotide triphosphate transporter efficiently imports the triphosphates of both d5SICS and dNaM (d5SICSTP and dNaMTP) into Escherichia coli, and that the endogenous replication machinery uses them to accurately replicate a plasmid containing d5SICS–dNaM.

Neither the presence of the unnatural triphosphates nor the replication of the UBP introduces a notable growth burden.

Lastly, we find that the UBP is not efficiently excised by DNA repair pathways.
Thus, the resulting bacterium is the first organism to propagate stably an expanded genetic alphabet.
http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/va ... 13314.html


Neat :).
It's a case of incorporating the artificial nucleotides , rather than manufacturing them itself (which would be bigger news), but this has BIG uses for clinical usages - (in many cases, you want organisms that you can "shut off", with an expiration date. For hunting viruses or other bacteria, or for controlling potentially dangerous GMO bacteria).
Awesome fun for the lab who found out that this worked without requiring all the steps they thought it would require further :D.
Photography
Genius is always allowed some leeway, once the hammer has been pried from its hands and the blood has been cleaned up.
To improve is to change; to be perfect is to change often.
User avatar
Broomstick
Emperor's Hand
Posts: 28822
Joined: 2004-01-02 07:04pm
Location: Industrial armpit of the US Midwest

Re: Scientists expand DNA alphabet in living Organism

Post by Broomstick »

I'm glad someone started this thread.

I agree, it's exciting news, but I'm not sure what applications this could be used for. I'm also wondering what the risks are. I'm not talking about a "grey ooze" apocalypse but changing living organisms usually does have downsides as well as benefits. No such thing as a free lunch and all that.

What I've heard about possible benefits is all very vague. I'm quite happy if this is done simply for the sake of pure knowledge, of course, I'm just curious if there is anything in the works to take this from SCIENCE! to a usable technology of some sort.
A life is like a garden. Perfect moments can be had, but not preserved, except in memory. Leonard Nimoy.

Now I did a job. I got nothing but trouble since I did it, not to mention more than a few unkind words as regard to my character so let me make this abundantly clear. I do the job. And then I get paid.- Malcolm Reynolds, Captain of Serenity, which sums up my feelings regarding the lawsuit discussed here.

If a free society cannot help the many who are poor, it cannot save the few who are rich. - John F. Kennedy

Sam Vimes Theory of Economic Injustice
Darmalus
Jedi Master
Posts: 1131
Joined: 2007-06-16 09:28am
Location: Mountain View, California

Re: Scientists expand DNA alphabet in living Organism

Post by Darmalus »

Broomstick wrote:I agree, it's exciting news, but I'm not sure what applications this could be used for. I'm also wondering what the risks are.
If you make a designer organism that does, well, anything with the UBPs you can tell it to stop just by stopping the supply of UBP food. It's the most reliable kill switch I can think of, since UBPs don't happen in nature it makes it really hard to bypass. It makes the danger of something escaping into the wild less of a danger, like all those stories where we put a prison on a planet or moon with no air.

The danger is, of course, that the organism mutates and starts making it's own UBPs and your kill switch no longer works.
Post Reply