How gullible are they, do you think?

Axton · Post by **Axton** » 2016-05-24 01:20am

Think they'll fall for this?

Ziggy Stardust · Post by **Ziggy Stardust** » 2016-05-24 06:21pm

... what?

biostem · Post by **biostem** » 2016-05-24 06:29pm

The problem is that some meme like this is "feel good", while the explanation about trapped gas bubbles in molten rock or some such requires actually thinking and boring science...

U.P. Cinnabar · Post by **U.P. Cinnabar** » 2016-05-24 07:33pm

biostem wrote:The problem is that some meme like this is "feel good", while the explanation about trapped gas bubbles in molten rock or some such requires actually thinking and boring science...

Science, schmience. That caption has all the right Creationist buzzwords, so therefore it's true, right?

biostem · Post by **biostem** » 2016-05-24 07:35pm

U.P. Cinnabar wrote:
biostem wrote:The problem is that some meme like this is "feel good", while the explanation about trapped gas bubbles in molten rock or some such requires actually thinking and boring science...
Science, schmience. That caption has all the right Creationist buzzwords, so therefore it's true, right?

If you want to go that route, I heard from a reliable source, (that I won't give), that this is actually a pre-human spaghetti extrusion device, graced to our early ancestors by his divine noodleness.

U.P. Cinnabar · Post by **U.P. Cinnabar** » 2016-05-24 07:42pm

You sure it wasn't alien astronauts?! Cause Erich von Däniken, and that bad hair meme guy both said it was aliens.

biostem · Post by **biostem** » 2016-05-24 08:59pm

U.P. Cinnabar wrote:You sure it wasn't alien astronauts?! Cause Erich von Däniken, and that bad hair meme guy both said it was aliens.

I haven't ruled out the possibility that the Flying Spaghetti Monster has an extraterrestrial origin...

Axton · Post by **Axton** » 2016-05-24 10:16pm

My question is do you think Creationists will fall for it?

biostem · Post by **biostem** » 2016-05-24 10:17pm

Axton wrote:My question is do you think Creationists will fall for it?

Anyone who accepts the argument from design would...

Axton · Post by **Axton** » 2016-05-24 10:47pm

Here's hoping it goes viral. >:)

Esquire · Post by **Esquire** » 2016-05-25 12:12am

Since, as we know, creationists often pull memes from SDN.

Flagg · Post by **Flagg** » 2016-05-25 12:54am

Secrete, not secret. To secret something is to hide it. Like Jared from Subway's kiddie porn collection or Rob Schneider's career. To secrete is to ooze out or discharge. Like jizm or Barry White's voice.

SpottedKitty · Post by **SpottedKitty** » 2016-05-25 01:05am

Flagg wrote:Secrete, not secret. To secret something is to hide it. Like Jared from Subway's kiddie porn collection or Rob Schneider's career. To secrete is to ooze out or discharge. Like jizm or Barry White's voice.

Don't forget, spelling glitches like that are normal and to be expected in these sorts of posts genuinely written by and for the target audience... all the better to gulp it down hook, line and sinker IMHO.

madd0ct0r · Post by **madd0ct0r** » 2016-05-25 04:02am

It would be better if it was a genuine, crazy animal that evolved. Aphid farming ants for example

U.P. Cinnabar · Post by **U.P. Cinnabar** » 2016-05-25 06:56am

Esquire wrote:Since, as we know, creationists often pull memes from SDN.

Though I'm honestly surprised they haven't tried to spam their memes onto SDN.

Esquire · Post by **Esquire** » 2016-05-25 08:05am

I want to say they have - somebody who's been here longer might know for sure.

U.P. Cinnabar · Post by **U.P. Cinnabar** » 2016-05-25 09:47am

Esquire wrote:I want to say they have - somebody who's been here longer might know for sure.

Or the mods might, since they'd have to deal with that, one way or another.

Elheru Aran · Post by **Elheru Aran** » 2016-05-25 09:57am

There was a brief invasion of religious trolls wayyyyyyyyy back in the day, I want to say, but it was fairly swiftly dealt with. When arguments started falling back on 'but the Bible says so' that tended to be received harshly.

Post by **K. A. Pital** » 2016-06-01 02:02pm

Throw it on Facebook and you'll have people reposting this with serious intent in no time...

Axton · Post by **Axton** » 2016-06-01 03:34pm

I almost dread the idea that you're right. Bible shouters are not renowned for their ability to spot satire, of either the unintentional or intentional varieties.

Post by **Broomstick** » 2016-06-01 05:52pm

Their inability to spot satire is due to Poe's law.

Flagg · Post by **Flagg** » 2016-06-06 09:42pm

SpottedKitty wrote:
Flagg wrote:Secrete, not secret. To secret something is to hide it. Like Jared from Subway's kiddie porn collection or Rob Schneider's career. To secrete is to ooze out or discharge. Like jizm or Barry White's voice.
Don't forget, spelling glitches like that are normal and to be expected in these sorts of posts genuinely written by and for the target audience... all the better to gulp it down hook, line and sinker IMHO.

True. Plus the double for "jizm" and "Barry White's voice" as if there's a difference. God bless that instant panty soaking voice...

StarDestroyer.Net BBS

How gullible are they, do you think?

How gullible are they, do you think?

Re: How gullible are they, do you think?

Re: How gullible are they, do you think?

Re: How gullible are they, do you think?

Re: How gullible are they, do you think?

Re: How gullible are they, do you think?

Re: How gullible are they, do you think?

Re: How gullible are they, do you think?

Re: How gullible are they, do you think?

Re: How gullible are they, do you think?

Re: How gullible are they, do you think?

Re: How gullible are they, do you think?

Re: How gullible are they, do you think?

Re: How gullible are they, do you think?

Re: How gullible are they, do you think?

Re: How gullible are they, do you think?

Re: How gullible are they, do you think?

Re: How gullible are they, do you think?

Re: How gullible are they, do you think?

Re: How gullible are they, do you think?

Re: How gullible are they, do you think?

Re: How gullible are they, do you think?