Ban the bible

SLAM: debunk creationism, pseudoscience, and superstitions. Discuss logic and morality.

Moderator: Alyrium Denryle

User avatar
Darth Wong
Sith Lord
Sith Lord
Posts: 70028
Joined: 2002-07-03 12:25am
Location: Toronto, Canada
Contact:

Post by Darth Wong »

HemlockGrey wrote:
True, but we'd have less of them, and fewer people would be as eager to give up their lives. It's much easier to give up your life when you think Heaven awaits you, as opposed to silent, empty oblivion.
I don't know if we'd have had less of them. When you cut through the dogma, religions are essentially differing, particulary esoteric ideas. Any difference in ideas invites conflict. Simply altering the ideas involved does not change the potential for conflict, unless they are completely identical.
You are ignoring the fact that certain ideas directly engender conflict. The Bible contains many of these. Or do you intend to simply ignore the fact that the Judaic religions have been unusually violent throughout history, and with such an unusual level of cruelty? How about the point I made about fear of death? Do you plan to address that sometime?
Image
"It's not evil for God to do it. Or for someone to do it at God's command."- Jonathan Boyd on baby-killing

"you guys are fascinated with the use of those "rules of logic" to the extent that you don't really want to discussus anything."- GC

"I do not believe Russian Roulette is a stupid act" - Embracer of Darkness

"Viagra commercials appear to save lives" - tharkûn on US health care.

http://www.stardestroyer.net/Mike/RantMode/Blurbs.html
HemlockGrey
Fucking Awesome
Posts: 13834
Joined: 2002-07-04 03:21pm

Post by HemlockGrey »

You are ignoring the fact that certain ideas directly engender conflict. The Bible contains many of these. Or do you intend to simply ignore the fact that the Judaic religions have been unusually violent throughout history, and with such an unusual level of cruelty? How about the point I made about fear of death? Do you plan to address that sometime?
This is true. I merely postulate that religion does not cause, rather, it covers and excaberates(sp?) problems inherent in our world.
The End of Suburbia
"If more cars are inevitable, must there not be roads for them to run on?"
-Robert Moses

"The Wire" is the best show in the history of television. Watch it today.
User avatar
Darth Wong
Sith Lord
Sith Lord
Posts: 70028
Joined: 2002-07-03 12:25am
Location: Toronto, Canada
Contact:

Post by Darth Wong »

HemlockGrey wrote:This is true. I merely postulate that religion does not cause, rather, it covers and excaberates(sp?) problems inherent in our world.
Are you seriously arguing that religion cannot be identified as a cause for the Crusades or (for a more recent obviously religious example) 9/11? Not to mention the India/Pakistan conflict, or the seemingly endless acrimony over the ownership of Jerusalem?

Besides, if you admit that religion exacerbates the situation, then you concede that your earlier statement "I don't know if we'd have had less of them" is not true, since religion did make things worse than they would have otherwise been.
Image
"It's not evil for God to do it. Or for someone to do it at God's command."- Jonathan Boyd on baby-killing

"you guys are fascinated with the use of those "rules of logic" to the extent that you don't really want to discussus anything."- GC

"I do not believe Russian Roulette is a stupid act" - Embracer of Darkness

"Viagra commercials appear to save lives" - tharkûn on US health care.

http://www.stardestroyer.net/Mike/RantMode/Blurbs.html
HemlockGrey
Fucking Awesome
Posts: 13834
Joined: 2002-07-04 03:21pm

Post by HemlockGrey »

Are you seriously arguing that religion cannot be identified as a cause for the Crusades or (for a more recent obviously religious example) 9/11? Not to mention the India/Pakistan conflict, or the seemingly endless acrimony over the ownership of Jerusalem?

Besides, if you admit that religion exacerbates the situation, then you concede that your earlier statement "I don't know if we'd have had less of them" is not true, since religion did make things worse than they would have otherwise been.
Conceded.
The End of Suburbia
"If more cars are inevitable, must there not be roads for them to run on?"
-Robert Moses

"The Wire" is the best show in the history of television. Watch it today.
User avatar
Durandal
Bile-Driven Hate Machine
Posts: 17927
Joined: 2002-07-03 06:26pm
Location: Silicon Valley, CA
Contact:

Post by Durandal »

I wonder if the Nazis were just taking Mein Kampf "out of context" or "misinterpreting" it like the Crusaders and Inquisitors were the Bible.
Damien Sorresso

"Ever see what them computa bitchez do to numbas? It ain't natural. Numbas ain't supposed to be code, they supposed to quantify shit."
- The Onion
darthdavid
Pathetic Attention Whore
Posts: 5470
Joined: 2003-02-17 12:04pm
Location: Bat Country!

Post by darthdavid »

And mabye the terrorists were taking those books on bomb making out of context. :wink:
User avatar
Sir Sirius
Sith Devotee
Posts: 2975
Joined: 2002-12-09 12:15pm
Location: 6 hr 45 min R.A. and -16 degrees 43 minutes declination

Re: Ban the bible

Post by Sir Sirius »

jegs2 wrote:
Sir Sirius wrote:
jegs2 wrote:Banning the Bible would be a galactically stupid thing to do.
I agree , banning books is never a good idea, but if any book deserves to be banned the bible does.
If I listed here the number of books folks want banned, you'd finsish reading it before you turned 100, maybe. Banning any literature is stupid, short-sighted, and idiotic. Why don't we gather around a great big bondfire, screaming, "Seig Heil!" while we burn all the books with which we find disagreement? At the same time, we'll gather up those who "don't belong" and those with who we disagree and ship them off to "relocation" camps, where they'll never be seen again. But be careful, or it might be you who winds up "relocated."
:roll: Are you fucking illiterate or something?

I said that I agree with you that the bible should NOT be banned and that banning books is never a good idea. You know, actualy reading a post before you respond to it with some idiotic rant of "righteus" condemnation might be worth your while the next time, moron!
Image
User avatar
jegs2
Imperial Spook
Posts: 4782
Joined: 2002-08-22 06:23pm
Location: Alabama

Re: Ban the bible

Post by jegs2 »

Sir Sirius wrote:I said that I agree with you that the bible should NOT be banned and that banning books is never a good idea. You know, actualy reading a post before you respond to it with some idiotic rant of "righteus" condemnation might be worth your while the next time, moron!
It wasn't aimed specifically at you but the audience in general that might believe banning the Bible or any literature to be a good idea. If you took offense, I'm truly puzzled, but so be it...
John 3:16-18
Warwolves G2
The University of North Alabama Lions!
User avatar
Kitsune
Sith Devotee
Posts: 3412
Joined: 2003-04-05 10:52pm
Location: Foxes Den
Contact:

Post by Kitsune »

Darth Wong wrote: Are you seriously arguing that religion cannot be identified as a cause for the Crusades or (for a more recent obviously religious example) 9/11? Not to mention the India/Pakistan conflict, or the seemingly endless acrimony over the ownership of Jerusalem?
Just want to add that the Crusades were also because there were many younger sons who wanted land.
"He that would make his own liberty secure must guard even his enemy from oppression; for if he violates this duty, he establishes a precedent that will reach to himself."
Thomas Paine

"For the living know that they shall die: but the dead know not any thing, neither have they any more a reward; for the memory of them is forgotten."
Ecclesiastes 9:5 (KJV)
User avatar
Sir Sirius
Sith Devotee
Posts: 2975
Joined: 2002-12-09 12:15pm
Location: 6 hr 45 min R.A. and -16 degrees 43 minutes declination

Re: Ban the bible

Post by Sir Sirius »

jegs2 wrote:It wasn't aimed specifically at you but the audience in general that might believe banning the Bible or any literature to be a good idea. If you took offense, I'm truly puzzled, but so be it...
:?
You quoted my post and wrote your responce directly beneath it and now wonder why I thought that it was directed at me?!
Image
Post Reply