Just because a certain title is dangerous doesn't mean the actual format is.Gil Hamilton wrote:Um, those total immersion games are powerfully addictive and don't let you leave them. You become a wirehead, and you are going to need a loved one to bath and feed you for the rest of your life.Spanky The Dolphin wrote:Something like total immersion video games in Red Dwarf would be a better idea. I'd rather have information fed directly into my brain through a headset than have to go through surgery to get something put into my eyes so I can see stuff I can't even touch...
What I meant was an extrapolation based on as they were depicted in the TV show (episodes "Better Than Life," "Back to Reality," "Gunmen of the Apocalypse," and "Stoke Me a Clipper"), where total immersion and artificial reality are the formats and Better Than Life is one of the top TI sellers and less dangerous than its book counterpart.
I was also just refering to the TI/AR formats and delivery systems themselves, and not to any of the actual games.
The book version of Better Than Life was only dangerous because of how it was programmed and designed, since it gave no indication that what you were experiancing was artificial. The format and delivery system of such artificial reality devices and their games are safe if they are designed safely, with considerations given to user interface, physical monitoring, and presentation.