Tell me, are you completely incapable of discussing this as an adult? You rarely address my points and instead just preach at me. You never use specific examples but instead make vague generalizations.
Pretty much every one of your refutations were inadequate and in some cases false.
Yet you can't even show why or give specific examples. As usual, you just make empty accusations and hope I will accept them on blind faith since that is the way YOU operate and you are clearly incapable of seeing any other way of doing things.
You are not being scientific or logical but merely trying to prove a point.
Um, proving a point is what one is SUPPOSED to do in a debate. What would you think if I acted this way, ignored all of YOUR arguments by saying, "you're just trying to prove your side"? See how ridiculous your mentality is when the OTHER guy uses it?
Besides, whats the difference? Sicence IS about trying to prove a point. I'll tell you the difference. Science uses MEASURABLE, OBJECTIVE EVIDENCE (the way I have done) but it NEVER relys on "so-and-so said so" they way YOU always do.
That does not show much love of truth.
Wrong as usual. YOUR complete inability to back up any of your claims is what fails to show love of truth.
You have utterly FAILED to show that your side is "truth"
True science explores truth no matter where it leads and also admits its limitations.
And where have either I or science failed to do this?
YOU are the one who repeatdly tries to support his position based on "so-and-so says so". I have based my postition on EVIDENCE.
One of those limitations is the existence of God.
No one has ever been able to demonstrate objectively that he exists. People MUST take his existance on FAITH.
You will continue to be prejudiced and poorly informed until you take the time to explore and understand the ideas of those with which you disagree.
On the contrary, I HAVE explored ideas with those I disagreed with. Thats how I accepted evolution in the first place.
YOU on the other hand bury your head in the sand and refuse to look at the evidence FOR evolution or even my arguments, hence your refusal to debate this discussion point by point the way I have done. Meanwhile you blindly accept every non-sensical creationist argument in the book even though they were shot down decades ago.
And maybe the most important thing for you to study would be religion because you don't seem to know much about it.
I clearly know much more about the Bible than you do since I have been the one who repeatedly references explicit verses while you just make vague generalizations.
I would also advise you not to believe everything that "experts" tell you because human beings have an annoying habit of being biased.
I could say the same about the Bible.
Accusations of bias are not logically valid. Its what is known as an "ad-hominem fallacy" and someone like you who claims to know about philosophy should know that. Thanks for proving you were lying about being well educated in philosophy.
So good bye and good luck.
Plain English Translation, "I can't back up any of my arguments so I'm not going to play the game anymore".
Let me know when you get out of high school so we can discuss this like ADULTS.
"