Revenge At A Price

SLAM: debunk creationism, pseudoscience, and superstitions. Discuss logic and morality.

Moderator: Alyrium Denryle

Would you exact your revenge on your attackers at the risk of losing your humanity and risking other lives?

Yes.
38
52%
No.
35
48%
 
Total votes: 73

User avatar
Metatwaddle
Jedi Council Member
Posts: 1910
Joined: 2003-07-07 07:29am
Location: Up the Amazon on a Rubber Duck
Contact:

Post by Metatwaddle »

I'd probably inject myself, but only because I wouldn't be thinking clearly. It's not a moral thing to do, obviously.
Should any political party attempt to abolish social security, unemployment insurance, and eliminate labor laws and farm programs, you would not hear of that party again in our political history. There is a tiny splinter group, of course, that believes you can do these things... their number is negligible and they are stupid. --Dwight D. Eisenhower
User avatar
defanatic
Jedi Knight
Posts: 627
Joined: 2005-09-05 03:26am

Post by defanatic »

Given my state of mind, I would do it. Morally... Well, I might do it. How would you find these guys, anyway?
>>Your head hurts.

>>Quaff painkillers

>>Your head no longer hurts.
User avatar
DesertFly
has been designed to act as a flotation device
Posts: 1381
Joined: 2005-10-18 11:35pm
Location: The Emerald City

Post by DesertFly »

Screw revenge, I would inject myself just so I could cause needless havoc and show these pathetic mortals once and for all who their true master is. I would become a god! Muahahahaha! Muahahahaha!!

Seriously though, I probably would.
Proud member of the no sigs club.
User avatar
haard
Padawan Learner
Posts: 343
Joined: 2006-03-29 07:29am
Location: Center of my world

Post by haard »

No. Mostly because I have never been much for revenge for its own sake, not when it is only me that has been wounded/slighted/whatever.

Now if those thugs had hurt my wife, it would be an enirely different matter.
If at first you don't succeed, maybe failure is your style

Economic Left/Right: 0.25
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -5.03

Thus Aristotle laid it down that a heavy object falls faster then a light one does.
The important thing about this idea is not that he was wrong, but that it never occurred to Aristotle to check it.
- Albert Szent-Györgyi de Nagyrápolt
Old Peculier
Padawan Learner
Posts: 159
Joined: 2006-02-17 11:40am

Post by Old Peculier »

I said no, before reading the thread. I didn't consider that I would be not be thinking clearly. Put in this position, I don't know what I'd do, but I'd like to think that I'd die quietly, and perhaps destroy the sample if I could.
User avatar
Admiral Valdemar
Outside Context Problem
Posts: 31572
Joined: 2002-07-04 07:17pm
Location: UK

Post by Admiral Valdemar »

nickolay1 wrote:Can the purified form of this virus propagate through airborne transmission? If that's the case, I'd do it, because dying would most certainly lead to the discovery of the injector on my corpse and its subsequent analysis. This would possibly cause the infection of several other individuals, who would potentially be able to do far more damage than I.
The virus works only on the genetics of the host it's originally injected into, hence, once it's in you, the best way to produce more off-spring is to force an embryo into genetic relatives so the virus is not a risk here. The issue is that, in order to propagate your kind (which you will soon after you've had your revenge), your best bet is to use your family as hosts for similar organisms, so inevitably, your family gets dragged into this potentially, and being ripped apart by a gestating freak in your chest is not nice.

It's also an RNA virus, so forget any cures which would nullify the choice in this moral quandary anyway (not that I expect anyone would catch you and treat you, the G-Virus makes you pretty much an endlessly mutating beast so you'd adapt to anything short of a C4 surprise).

I could add another factor into this, that being if you do inject yourself, you accidentally unleash the T-Virus as Birkin did. In which case, it'd be a simpler decision given you'd condemn an entire city to plague to be sanitised by a nuke strike. Though on the plus side, street crime plummets that year.

The results do surprise me somewhat here, though it was more biased towards a "yes" vote last night.
nickolay1
Jedi Knight
Posts: 553
Joined: 2005-05-25 12:42am
Location: Marietta, GA

Post by nickolay1 »

That wasn't exactly my intended question. Is there any possibility of others being infected if I don't inject myself and simply die? For example, those performing forensic analysis?
User avatar
defanatic
Jedi Knight
Posts: 627
Joined: 2005-09-05 03:26am

Post by defanatic »

haard wrote:No. Mostly because I have never been much for revenge for its own sake, not when it is only me that has been wounded/slighted/whatever.

Now if those thugs had hurt my wife, it would be an enirely different matter.
So... You'd inject your wife with this stuff so she can carry out revenge?
>>Your head hurts.

>>Quaff painkillers

>>Your head no longer hurts.
User avatar
Dooey Jo
Sith Devotee
Posts: 3127
Joined: 2002-08-09 01:09pm
Location: The land beyond the forest; Sweden.
Contact:

Post by Dooey Jo »

So will I just become a mindless zombie, or will I become unable to not kill and infect things, but retain some form of self-awareness? Because... ah, I'll probably take the shot anyway. It's probably better than dying; at least that's what I'm going to think while lying there.
Image
"Nippon ichi, bitches! Boing-boing."
Mai smote the demonic fires of heck...

Faker Ninjas invented ninjitsu
User avatar
Bounty
Emperor's Hand
Posts: 10767
Joined: 2005-01-20 08:33am
Location: Belgium

Post by Bounty »

Dooey Jo wrote:So will I just become a mindless zombie, or will I become unable to not kill and infect things, but retain some form of self-awareness? Because... ah, I'll probably take the shot anyway. It's probably better than dying; at least that's what I'm going to think while lying there.
Well, if you're like Birkin, you'll become a rapidly mutating bioweapon singlemindedly trying to reproduce and kill for nourishment. Think zombie, but with a sense of self-preservation and enough rudimentary intelligence to follow prey.
User avatar
Admiral Valdemar
Outside Context Problem
Posts: 31572
Joined: 2002-07-04 07:17pm
Location: UK

Post by Admiral Valdemar »

nickolay1 wrote:That wasn't exactly my intended question. Is there any possibility of others being infected if I don't inject myself and simply die? For example, those performing forensic analysis?
No. For simplicity's sake, the autoinjector is foolproof and won't shatter or anything.

As for what you become, everything Birkin did, pretty much. Your body will go on adapting at amazing speed to any stimuli and so your mind deteriorates too as your form alters endlessly. Any idea of regret after the fact is not going to happen with an animalistic mind.
User avatar
haard
Padawan Learner
Posts: 343
Joined: 2006-03-29 07:29am
Location: Center of my world

Post by haard »

defanatic wrote:
haard wrote:No. Mostly because I have never been much for revenge for its own sake, not when it is only me that has been wounded/slighted/whatever.

Now if those thugs had hurt my wife, it would be an enirely different matter.
So... You'd inject your wife with this stuff so she can carry out revenge?
No, if they killed my wife I'd inject myself to carry out revenge if that was the only way.

I would not sacrefice my family or my humanity for revenge against my would-be murderers, but I would sacrefice a whole lot of things, including myself, to avenge my wife.
If at first you don't succeed, maybe failure is your style

Economic Left/Right: 0.25
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -5.03

Thus Aristotle laid it down that a heavy object falls faster then a light one does.
The important thing about this idea is not that he was wrong, but that it never occurred to Aristotle to check it.
- Albert Szent-Györgyi de Nagyrápolt
User avatar
haard
Padawan Learner
Posts: 343
Joined: 2006-03-29 07:29am
Location: Center of my world

Post by haard »

I might add that I will probably feel different once I have kids...
If at first you don't succeed, maybe failure is your style

Economic Left/Right: 0.25
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -5.03

Thus Aristotle laid it down that a heavy object falls faster then a light one does.
The important thing about this idea is not that he was wrong, but that it never occurred to Aristotle to check it.
- Albert Szent-Györgyi de Nagyrápolt
User avatar
Admiral Valdemar
Outside Context Problem
Posts: 31572
Joined: 2002-07-04 07:17pm
Location: UK

Post by Admiral Valdemar »

haard wrote:
No, if they killed my wife I'd inject myself to carry out revenge if that was the only way.

I would not sacrefice my family or my humanity for revenge against my would-be murderers, but I would sacrefice a whole lot of things, including myself, to avenge my wife.
So you'd dispell with your normal moral obligations if it was your significant other who was attacked as opposed to yourself? Would the added risk of the same problems occurring not warrant simply letting the police try and do their job rather than go with your own brand of vigilantism?
User avatar
haard
Padawan Learner
Posts: 343
Joined: 2006-03-29 07:29am
Location: Center of my world

Post by haard »

Admiral Valdemar wrote:
So you'd dispell with your normal moral obligations if it was your significant other who was attacked as opposed to yourself?
Yes.
Admiral Valdemar wrote: Would the added risk of the same problems occurring not warrant simply letting the police try and do their job rather than go with your own brand of vigilantism?
No, not for me, even if they were imprisoned (which was not really clear from the original question, "the scum /../ whom no office of the law will punish properly.".

Suffice to say, I would not really care for justice, but vengeance. While I agree with the idea of the state monopoly on violence, and I understand that the society would have to (at least try to) punish me, it would not change the fact that I would seek revenge.

Of course, I'd normally do that in a more mundane way (5.65 probably), but if the choice was the virus or no vengeance, I do think I would chose the virus.
If at first you don't succeed, maybe failure is your style

Economic Left/Right: 0.25
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -5.03

Thus Aristotle laid it down that a heavy object falls faster then a light one does.
The important thing about this idea is not that he was wrong, but that it never occurred to Aristotle to check it.
- Albert Szent-Györgyi de Nagyrápolt
User avatar
SylasGaunt
Sith Acolyte
Posts: 5267
Joined: 2002-09-04 09:39pm
Location: GGG

Post by SylasGaunt »

Admiral Valdemar wrote:your family gets dragged into this potentially, and being ripped apart by a gestating freak in your chest is not nice.
IIRC that only happens to incompatible hosts.
User avatar
Admiral Valdemar
Outside Context Problem
Posts: 31572
Joined: 2002-07-04 07:17pm
Location: UK

Post by Admiral Valdemar »

haard wrote:
Yes.
Interesting. Why?

No, not for me, even if they were imprisoned (which was not really clear from the original question, "the scum /../ whom no office of the law will punish properly.".
You have the usual chances of conviction, so they could get off from a technicality or get a lousy sentence. Either way, depending on your mentality, some would rather beat the living shit out of these people as opposed to letting justice take its course.
Suffice to say, I would not really care for justice, but vengeance. While I agree with the idea of the state monopoly on violence, and I understand that the society would have to (at least try to) punish me, it would not change the fact that I would seek revenge.

Of course, I'd normally do that in a more mundane way (5.65 probably), but if the choice was the virus or no vengeance, I do think I would chose the virus.
I'm curious as to why you'd go that route when it was a loved one attacked, but not yourself. The consequences are the same near enough with other innocents likely targets no matter who is harmed. You make the case that your wife is a special situation that demands relentless vengeance without limits, while your death would pass by without such violent repercussions.
SylasGaunt wrote:
IIRC that only happens to incompatible hosts.
We never really find out, but if it goes the way you went, you still have your family becoming what you are and anyone else being torn asunder by your pseudocopies.
User avatar
haard
Padawan Learner
Posts: 343
Joined: 2006-03-29 07:29am
Location: Center of my world

Post by haard »

Admiral Valdemar wrote:
haard wrote:
Yes.
Interesting. Why?
haard wrote:
No, not for me, even if they were imprisoned (which was not really clear from the original question, "the scum /../ whom no office of the law will punish properly.".
You have the usual chances of conviction, so they could get off from a technicality or get a lousy sentence. Either way, depending on your mentality, some would rather beat the living shit out of these people as opposed to letting justice take its course.
Suffice to say, I would not really care for justice, but vengeance. While I agree with the idea of the state monopoly on violence, and I understand that the society would have to (at least try to) punish me, it would not change the fact that I would seek revenge.

Of course, I'd normally do that in a more mundane way (5.65 probably), but if the choice was the virus or no vengeance, I do think I would chose the virus.
I'm curious as to why you'd go that route when it was a loved one attacked, but not yourself. The consequences are the same near enough with other innocents likely targets no matter who is harmed. You make the case that your wife is a special situation that demands relentless vengeance without limits, while your death would pass by without such violent repercussions.
Well, I do not agree that the consequenses are the same - not even similar, to me.

If I die, I die, and it is for others to handle that. Of course I do not want to die, and I would fight to survive but 'after the fact', so to speak, I do not require vengeance. Suffice to say, I am not one to hold a grudge. I dislike people from time to time, I just don't have any urge to hurt them.

Not that I am perfect in this matter - I love sparring both verbal and physical, and in the heat of battle you sometimes overstep the bounds.



Now all this changes when it comes to my wife. Why? No easy answer.

(below this, I've been writing and revriting for half an hour... so much thought, so little text :roll: )
Lots of reasons I can think of, but the true one is that I feel that way; when I think of anyone hurting her, I feel hate.


Vengeance would not be for her obviously, since she was dead, but for me.
If at first you don't succeed, maybe failure is your style

Economic Left/Right: 0.25
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -5.03

Thus Aristotle laid it down that a heavy object falls faster then a light one does.
The important thing about this idea is not that he was wrong, but that it never occurred to Aristotle to check it.
- Albert Szent-Györgyi de Nagyrápolt
User avatar
Guardsman Bass
Cowardly Codfish
Posts: 9281
Joined: 2002-07-07 12:01am
Location: Beneath the Deepest Sea

Post by Guardsman Bass »

Considering that I would be in a state of total mindfucking pain after the attack, I would choose to live, and slaughter the little punks. Although it'll get messy later, maybe I'll start an urban legend that will greatly discourage street crime.
“It is possible to commit no mistakes and still lose. That is not a weakness. That is life.”
-Jean-Luc Picard


"Men are afraid that women will laugh at them. Women are afraid that men will kill them."
-Margaret Atwood
User avatar
SWPIGWANG
Jedi Council Member
Posts: 1693
Joined: 2002-09-24 05:00pm
Location: Commence Primary Ignorance

Post by SWPIGWANG »

I'd probably be too busy dying to do anything. (consider how little I do when I'm actually alive)

I am my mind, and I'm dead anyways. No point inflicting more.
User avatar
Agent Fisher
Rabid Monkey
Posts: 3671
Joined: 2003-04-29 11:56pm
Location: Sac-Town, CA, USA, Earth, Sol, Milky Way, Universe

Post by Agent Fisher »

I would choose no. Even though people here may look down upon my beliefs, I believe I'm going somewhere better when I die.
User avatar
Oni Koneko Damien
Sith Marauder
Posts: 3852
Joined: 2004-03-10 07:23pm
Location: Yar Yar Hump Hump!
Contact:

Post by Oni Koneko Damien »

I'd *like* to choose no. If I were in the mindset I am in now, I would choose no. The thing is, after being beaten, slashed, and left for dead in a cold gutter, I'm fairly certain that adrenaline levels would be hitting a critical plataeu in my body, and thinking clearly would be the last thing I'd be doing. In that situation, I'd probably be reduced to a rather animalistic state of mind: Survive at all costs, which means despite all my sound moral objections now, I'd take the injection anyways because at the time, I'd be mentally incapacitated.
Gaian Paradigm: Because not all fantasy has to be childish crap.
Ephemeral Pie: Because not all role-playing has to be shallow.
My art: Because not all DA users are talentless emo twits.
"Phant, quit abusing the He-Wench before he turns you into a caged bitch at a Ren Fair and lets the tourists toss half munched turkey legs at your backside." -Mr. Coffee
User avatar
Oni Koneko Damien
Sith Marauder
Posts: 3852
Joined: 2004-03-10 07:23pm
Location: Yar Yar Hump Hump!
Contact:

Post by Oni Koneko Damien »

Holy crap, I just completely tied up the votes at thirty-three each...how's that for a split crowd?
Gaian Paradigm: Because not all fantasy has to be childish crap.
Ephemeral Pie: Because not all role-playing has to be shallow.
My art: Because not all DA users are talentless emo twits.
"Phant, quit abusing the He-Wench before he turns you into a caged bitch at a Ren Fair and lets the tourists toss half munched turkey legs at your backside." -Mr. Coffee
User avatar
Guardsman Bass
Cowardly Codfish
Posts: 9281
Joined: 2002-07-07 12:01am
Location: Beneath the Deepest Sea

Post by Guardsman Bass »

Agent Fisher wrote:I would choose no. Even though people here may look down upon my beliefs, I believe I'm going somewhere better when I die.
Yeah, but are you going to remember that when you are dying, right after fighting an intense struggle with a group of thugs?
“It is possible to commit no mistakes and still lose. That is not a weakness. That is life.”
-Jean-Luc Picard


"Men are afraid that women will laugh at them. Women are afraid that men will kill them."
-Margaret Atwood
User avatar
Admiral Valdemar
Outside Context Problem
Posts: 31572
Joined: 2002-07-04 07:17pm
Location: UK

Post by Admiral Valdemar »

Guardsman Bass wrote:
Agent Fisher wrote:I would choose no. Even though people here may look down upon my beliefs, I believe I'm going somewhere better when I die.
Yeah, but are you going to remember that when you are dying, right after fighting an intense struggle with a group of thugs?
I would bet "no", given a lot of people start doubting their worldview at times of extreme stress, which getting beaten to death most certainly is. To be in a sound state-of-mind when at Death's door is hard to do, heck, I've had friends who doubted their Christian afterlife when a relative was terminally ill, letalone themselves.

You'd have to be truly apathetic or noble and able to keep a real grip on your sanity to pass up the payback option.
Post Reply