Unless, of course, you recognize that all of the ancient writers thought that the Earth was the universe, so that when someone destroys the universe in those ancient writings, he's really only destroying Earth: a far less impressive feat than destroying the entire universe. In fact, to take it further, they generally did not even realize that the Earth was round, and they thought of it as a basically flat plane. Therefore, when they said "the universe", it's more than likely they were referring to one small patch of one continent, and the little bit of atmosphere above it. Ergo, a major asteroid impact would "destroy the universe" according to the cosmology in use at the time those writings were created.General Zod wrote:When you hit the limits of being able to destroy the entire universe (which includes time, fyi), speculating what could be more powerful is a tad bit pointless.Plekhanov wrote:Of course I’m speculating, I explicitly said I was a few posts back, the Duchess of Zeon mentioned a pantheon with what seemed to be at the upper limit so far as the ability to create & destroy things can go, so I was ‘idly pondering’ what could surpass that. How you think that’s off topic for a thread entitled ‘Most powerful god from religion...’ or why you’re getting so worked up about this is beyond me.
Most powerful god from religion...
Moderator: Alyrium Denryle
- Darth Wong
- Sith Lord
- Posts: 70028
- Joined: 2002-07-03 12:25am
- Location: Toronto, Canada
- Contact:
"It's not evil for God to do it. Or for someone to do it at God's command."- Jonathan Boyd on baby-killing
"you guys are fascinated with the use of those "rules of logic" to the extent that you don't really want to discussus anything."- GC
"I do not believe Russian Roulette is a stupid act" - Embracer of Darkness
"Viagra commercials appear to save lives" - tharkûn on US health care.
http://www.stardestroyer.net/Mike/RantMode/Blurbs.html
"you guys are fascinated with the use of those "rules of logic" to the extent that you don't really want to discussus anything."- GC
"I do not believe Russian Roulette is a stupid act" - Embracer of Darkness
"Viagra commercials appear to save lives" - tharkûn on US health care.
http://www.stardestroyer.net/Mike/RantMode/Blurbs.html
Many of the early faiths included the Sun the moon and the stars in their definition of "The universe"Darth Wong wrote:Unless, of course, you recognize that all of the ancient writers thought that the Earth was the universe, so that when someone destroys the universe in those ancient writings, he's really only destroying Earth: a far less impressive feat than destroying the entire universe. In fact, to take it further, they generally did not even realize that the Earth was round, and they thought of it as a basically flat plane. Therefore, when they said "the universe", it's more than likely they were referring to one small patch of one continent, and the little bit of atmosphere above it. Ergo, a major asteroid impact would "destroy the universe" according to the cosmology in use at the time those writings were created.General Zod wrote:When you hit the limits of being able to destroy the entire universe (which includes time, fyi), speculating what could be more powerful is a tad bit pointless.Plekhanov wrote:Of course I’m speculating, I explicitly said I was a few posts back, the Duchess of Zeon mentioned a pantheon with what seemed to be at the upper limit so far as the ability to create & destroy things can go, so I was ‘idly pondering’ what could surpass that. How you think that’s off topic for a thread entitled ‘Most powerful god from religion...’ or why you’re getting so worked up about this is beyond me.
- Darth Wong
- Sith Lord
- Posts: 70028
- Joined: 2002-07-03 12:25am
- Location: Toronto, Canada
- Contact:
Learn to read. As I clearly posted earlier, they had no idea how large those things were either. They thought the stars were just little shining lights in the sky.Block wrote:Many of the early faiths included the Sun the moon and the stars in their definition of "The universe"
"It's not evil for God to do it. Or for someone to do it at God's command."- Jonathan Boyd on baby-killing
"you guys are fascinated with the use of those "rules of logic" to the extent that you don't really want to discussus anything."- GC
"I do not believe Russian Roulette is a stupid act" - Embracer of Darkness
"Viagra commercials appear to save lives" - tharkûn on US health care.
http://www.stardestroyer.net/Mike/RantMode/Blurbs.html
"you guys are fascinated with the use of those "rules of logic" to the extent that you don't really want to discussus anything."- GC
"I do not believe Russian Roulette is a stupid act" - Embracer of Darkness
"Viagra commercials appear to save lives" - tharkûn on US health care.
http://www.stardestroyer.net/Mike/RantMode/Blurbs.html
Perhaps someone should have informed these hindu gods that there was no time before (if you can really use such a term) the universe existed and then they'd have known that after having destroyed the universe they wouldn't have been able to continue acting themselves so as to be able to create another one.General Zod wrote:When you hit the limits of being able to destroy the entire universe (which includes time, fyi), speculating what could be more powerful is a tad bit pointless.
The Mahadeva. If I'm getting my Hindu beliefs right, everything, and I do mean everything, is just a portion of him. Even other gods. If that's true, then the other gods are less then him because they are only a small fraction of him.
I've committed the greatest sin, worse than anything done here today. I sold half my soul to the devil. -Ivan Isaac, the Half Souled Knight
Mecha Maniac
Mecha Maniac
No that was a Sumerian craetion myth.Plekhanov wrote:I vaguely recall an Egyptian creation myth in which one of their gods created the universe simply by ejaculating (though it is quite possible i've got that memory badly mangled) which I suppose is even more impressive than giving birth to it.Darth Wong wrote:Aren't there some gods which gave birth to the universe, thus implying that they are much more vast than the universe itself?
- chitoryu12
- Jedi Council Member
- Posts: 1997
- Joined: 2005-12-19 09:34pm
- Location: Florida
- The Duchess of Zeon
- Gözde
- Posts: 14566
- Joined: 2002-09-18 01:06am
- Location: Exiled in the Pale of Settlement.
The Hindus had a sufficiently advanced understanding of the world in the period of the writing of the Vedic Sagas that they were able to conceptualize of the Moon as being a planet or realm similiar to our own on which battles could be waged. They generally tended to refer to the universe in terms of "a thousand suns" which implied some idea of a coherence between their understanding of the sun and the universe; Sarasavsati (Harappan) civilization had sufficiently advanced mathematical precision to develop highly and efficiently planned cities which still elicit praise by modern standards.Darth Wong wrote: Unless, of course, you recognize that all of the ancient writers thought that the Earth was the universe, so that when someone destroys the universe in those ancient writings, he's really only destroying Earth: a far less impressive feat than destroying the entire universe. In fact, to take it further, they generally did not even realize that the Earth was round, and they thought of it as a basically flat plane. Therefore, when they said "the universe", it's more than likely they were referring to one small patch of one continent, and the little bit of atmosphere above it. Ergo, a major asteroid impact would "destroy the universe" according to the cosmology in use at the time those writings were created.
Hindu cosmology identified seven distinct realms beyond the stars which were habitable by godlike beings, the masses of stars themselves, and then the moon and sun and inside of their range, 11 named bodies in the solar system (a mix of planets and comets apparently), and the generic term that roughly translates as "the Hellish planets" which may have been meteors and so on. The age of the universe was said to be 4.32 billion years, and that is a "day of Brahma"; the universe would be destroyed in another 4.32 billion years, a "night of Brahma", making the life-expectancy of the universe around 8.64 billion years. All of these figures are verified and had actual meanings rather than just "really big" in the Sanskirt of the Vedic Sagas. As the universe was conceived of on this magnitude, its regular destruction and restoration is certainly the greatest act claimed for any God by his followers in human history.
The threshold for inclusion in Wikipedia is verifiability, not truth. -- Wikipedia's No Original Research policy page.
In 1966 the Soviets find something on the dark side of the Moon. In 2104 they come back. -- Red Banner / White Star, a nBSG continuation story. Updated to Chapter 4.0 -- 14 January 2013.
In 1966 the Soviets find something on the dark side of the Moon. In 2104 they come back. -- Red Banner / White Star, a nBSG continuation story. Updated to Chapter 4.0 -- 14 January 2013.
- The Duchess of Zeon
- Gözde
- Posts: 14566
- Joined: 2002-09-18 01:06am
- Location: Exiled in the Pale of Settlement.
Here's a quote from the Rig Veda on the pre-creation period:Plekhanov wrote:Perhaps someone should have informed these hindu gods that there was no time before (if you can really use such a term) the universe existed and then they'd have known that after having destroyed the universe they wouldn't have been able to continue acting themselves so as to be able to create another one.General Zod wrote:When you hit the limits of being able to destroy the entire universe (which includes time, fyi), speculating what could be more powerful is a tad bit pointless.
Then was not non-existence nor existence: there was no realm of air, no sky beyond it. What covered in, and where? and what gave shelter? Was water there, unfathomed depth of water? Death was not then, nor was there aught immortal: no sign was there, the day's and night's divider. That One Thing, breathless, breathed by its own nature: apart from it was nothing whatsoever. Darkness there was at first concealed in darkness this. All was indiscriminated chaos. All that existed then was void and form less: by the great power of Warmth was born that Unit. Thereafter rose Desire in the beginning, Desire, the primal seed and germ of Spirit. Sages who searched with their heart's thought discovered the existent's kinship in the non-existent. Transversely was their severing line extended: what was above it then, and what below it? There were begetters, there were mighty forces, free action here and energy up yonder. Who verily knows and who can here declare it, whence it was born and whence comes this creation? The devas are later than this world's production. Who knows then whence it first came into being? He, the first origin of this creation, whether he formed it all or did not form it, Whose eye controls this world in highest heaven, he verily knows it, or perhaps he knows not
The threshold for inclusion in Wikipedia is verifiability, not truth. -- Wikipedia's No Original Research policy page.
In 1966 the Soviets find something on the dark side of the Moon. In 2104 they come back. -- Red Banner / White Star, a nBSG continuation story. Updated to Chapter 4.0 -- 14 January 2013.
In 1966 the Soviets find something on the dark side of the Moon. In 2104 they come back. -- Red Banner / White Star, a nBSG continuation story. Updated to Chapter 4.0 -- 14 January 2013.
And the Moab king's offering of his son to their god drove away the Israelis:General Zod wrote:Which monotheistic God? If you're talking about the Christian God, keep in mind he was defeated by iron chariots. None of his demonstrated feats (as opposed to ignorant fundie claims) in the Bible are especially more impressive than anything someone from the Roman or Norse pantheon could accomplish.Simmon wrote:Well, assuming all are/were real, the monotheistic god is most powerful. That one was the only one claimed to be omnipotent. The Greek gods and all those others always had a narrow scope of ability.
2 Kings 3:27 wrote:Then he [The King of Moab] took his eldest son that should have reigned in his stead, and offered him [to Chemosh] for a burnt offering upon the wall. And there was great indignation against Israel: and they departed from him, and returned to their own land.