data_link wrote:I thank David, Supreme Lord of Monkeys for his fairness in judgment. That said, I would like to know how I gave anyone the impression that I adovacate killing people for their beliefs? Perhaps he misses the part where I said religous fundamentalists as opposed to simply religious people? Perhaps he is not aware of the fact that fundies in fact compose a very small fraction of all religious people? Or perhaps he is not aware of the fact that fundies DO nessecarily use their religion to harm other people.
Fundies have:
Committed numerous acts of harassment in their attempts to convert everyone to their religion.
The Republican and Democratic parties called my house numerous times a day in the last election asking that I vote for their candidate and donate money. I'd consider that an attempt to convert me to their way of thinking and harrasement, but I don't advocate that they die for it. I've never had any fundie do this to me.
data_link wrote:Attempted (and succeeded in some states) in mandating that a portion of their religion be taught in science classes.
People have a right to believe what they want. No amount of teaching can force me to believe either evolution or any type of religion.
data_link wrote:Taught millions of people not to think.
My college professor would disagree with you. He is one of the most intelligent people I know, and he belongs to a cult. As I said before, people can think and choose for themselves.
data_link wrote:Pubicly attacked science in all political avenues, thereby forcing scientists to spend inordinate amounts of time defending their profession as opposed to doing genuine research.
Seems to me that in pursuit of their defense they have done more research than if things like evolution had never been questioned. My enemies make me strong, my friends make me weak.
data_link wrote:Infiltrated American politics to allow for the U.S. support of highly immoral regimes (Israel)
This is altogther an entirely different subject, but I think what Israel has done since they have existed in modern times is far more restrained than what their opponents have tried to do to them. They could have killed every Muslim in the Middle East if they wanted to. Not only have they shown that they are willing to co-exist with other non-Israelis, they have tollerated other, large nations bulling them into giving up their land and allowing terrorist attacks to go unpunished.
data_link wrote:Discredited mainstream religion with their bigoted attitudes.
By saying discredited you say that the fundies have proven that they are right, and mainstream religion wrong.
data_link wrote:Harassed hundreds of millions of innocent non-fundies, for not conforming to their bigoted moral codes.
So you propose death to all people who harass you? I feel sorry for telemarketers if you ever get control of everything.
data_link wrote:Attempted (and succeded in some states) to outlaw:
Premarital sex
Care to back that up?
data_link wrote:Anal sex
Run Mike! You are going to prison.
data_link wrote:Homosexuality
So Verilon and company are posting from jail?
data_link wrote:Satanism
Really? PPOR
data_link wrote:Atheism
PPOR
data_link wrote:Science
Like I said, I know some professors that would disagree with you
data_link wrote:Abortion
When was this exactly?
data_link wrote:Swearing
Oh shit I'm going to jail!
data_link wrote:Democracy
So my vote a few days ago went into the trash?
data_link wrote:Thought
Please.
data_link wrote:And of course, there is that small subset of fundies who are also terrorists.
Tell that to the entire Middle East.
data_link wrote:This virus does not, and cannot, infect those who are religious but are nice enough to avoid using those beliefs to justify bigoted or opressive behavior. This does not target people for being religous or engaging in acts of worship. It only targets fundies, who are guilty of using their religious beliefs to proclaim themselves superior to others. If you cannot see the difference between that and killing every person with any type of belief that could not be backed up by scientific proof, then I truly pity you.
'Guilty of their religous beliefs'? Sounds like the thought patrol to me.