'But Scientists Have Been Wrong Before!'

SLAM: debunk creationism, pseudoscience, and superstitions. Discuss logic and morality.

Moderator: Alyrium Denryle

User avatar
SirNitram
Rest in Peace, Black Mage
Posts: 28367
Joined: 2002-07-03 04:48pm
Location: Somewhere between nowhere and everywhere

'But Scientists Have Been Wrong Before!'

Post by SirNitram »

Alright, I have to ask: How much of a degree of error should we expect with what we know now? We'd be fools to claim we've got it perfect now, so I'm assuming there's at least a ballpark guess about what will and won't change in theories. It's a question mostly relating to my position as a would-be sci-fi writer, and what pursuits might yield the most interesting results.
Manic Progressive: A liberal who violently swings from anger at politicos to despondency over them.

Out Of Context theatre: Ron Paul has repeatedly said he's not a racist. - Destructinator XIII on why Ron Paul isn't racist.

Shadowy Overlord - BMs/Black Mage Monkey - BOTM/Jetfire - Cybertron's Finest/General Miscreant/ASVS/Supermoderator Emeritus

Debator Classification: Trollhunter
User avatar
GrandMasterTerwynn
Emperor's Hand
Posts: 6787
Joined: 2002-07-29 06:14pm
Location: Somewhere on Earth.

Re: 'But Scientists Have Been Wrong Before!'

Post by GrandMasterTerwynn »

SirNitram wrote:Alright, I have to ask: How much of a degree of error should we expect with what we know now? We'd be fools to claim we've got it perfect now, so I'm assuming there's at least a ballpark guess about what will and won't change in theories. It's a question mostly relating to my position as a would-be sci-fi writer, and what pursuits might yield the most interesting results.
Currently, we can say, with fairly good certainty, that the following things are true:

A) The fastest anything travels at is the speed of light. This *Glares at the Weberites* will likely include gravity, as all the other forces seem to propagate at the speed of light.

B) The universe seems to be open and shall expand beyond the point that protons undergo radioactive decay.

C) Everything seems to have started with a big bang.

What we don't really know about are the following:

A) The exact structure of the universe. There are still a number of competing theories regarding strings, microdimensions, and hyperdimensions that seem to explain what's going on in the universe.

B) What, exactly, comprises all the dark energy or "quintessence" in the universe. For that matter, most dark matter is still unaccounted for.

C) The precise nature of black holes is something that's still up for speculation. Though we do think that they'd make great space-time dynamos, and seem to evaporate over time.

D) We still have to back-fill the process how we got from amino acids, simple proteins and DNA bases to cells.

E) The specific nature of the big bang is still up for speculation. For example, why is there more matter than antimatter in the universe, and why did everything expand with the irregularity needed for galaxies to form?

F) The question of the exact nature of the multiverse (meaning alternative realities) is still up for grabs.

This is, by no means, a comprehensive list.
User avatar
Admiral Valdemar
Outside Context Problem
Posts: 31572
Joined: 2002-07-04 07:17pm
Location: UK

Post by Admiral Valdemar »

They always pull this one with me, "But how can you prove God doesn't exist when scientists have been wrong and don't know everything?"

Ugh!
User avatar
Rye
To Mega Therion
Posts: 12493
Joined: 2003-03-08 07:48am
Location: Uighur, please!

Post by Rye »

Admiral Valdemar wrote:They always pull this one with me, "But how can you prove God doesn't exist when scientists have been wrong and don't know everything?"

Ugh!
Erm...you read the actual questions at the start of this thread?
EBC|Fucking Metal|Artist|Androgynous Sexfiend|Gozer Kvltist|
Listen to my music! http://www.soundclick.com/nihilanth
"America is, now, the most powerful and economically prosperous nation in the country." - Master of Ossus
User avatar
NecronLord
Harbinger of Doom
Harbinger of Doom
Posts: 27384
Joined: 2002-07-07 06:30am
Location: The Lost City

Post by NecronLord »

Religion has always been wrong until proven otherwise. Scientists are often correct.
Superior Moderator - BotB - HAB [Drill Instructor]-Writer- Stardestroyer.net's resident Star-God.
"We believe in the systematic understanding of the physical world through observation and experimentation, argument and debate and most of all freedom of will." ~ Stargate: The Ark of Truth
User avatar
GrandMasterTerwynn
Emperor's Hand
Posts: 6787
Joined: 2002-07-29 06:14pm
Location: Somewhere on Earth.

Post by GrandMasterTerwynn »

Admiral Valdemar wrote:They always pull this one with me, "But how can you prove God doesn't exist when scientists have been wrong and don't know everything?"

Ugh!
<mod>
Completely off-topic.
</mod>

D) Incidentally we can also say, with very high confidence, that there is no God running things in the commonly thought-of sense.
User avatar
Admiral Valdemar
Outside Context Problem
Posts: 31572
Joined: 2002-07-04 07:17pm
Location: UK

Post by Admiral Valdemar »

I thought my post was mildly on topic. *shrug*

Still, point remains, these people still use that argument.
User avatar
SirNitram
Rest in Peace, Black Mage
Posts: 28367
Joined: 2002-07-03 04:48pm
Location: Somewhere between nowhere and everywhere

Post by SirNitram »

Admiral Valdemar wrote:I thought my post was mildly on topic. *shrug*

Still, point remains, these people still use that argument.
Uh, dude, it's totally off-topic. The point of the thread is what could be disproven in the future. Please read the first post before you go insane.
Manic Progressive: A liberal who violently swings from anger at politicos to despondency over them.

Out Of Context theatre: Ron Paul has repeatedly said he's not a racist. - Destructinator XIII on why Ron Paul isn't racist.

Shadowy Overlord - BMs/Black Mage Monkey - BOTM/Jetfire - Cybertron's Finest/General Miscreant/ASVS/Supermoderator Emeritus

Debator Classification: Trollhunter
User avatar
Admiral Valdemar
Outside Context Problem
Posts: 31572
Joined: 2002-07-04 07:17pm
Location: UK

Post by Admiral Valdemar »

SirNitram wrote:
Admiral Valdemar wrote:I thought my post was mildly on topic. *shrug*

Still, point remains, these people still use that argument.
Uh, dude, it's totally off-topic. The point of the thread is what could be disproven in the future. Please read the first post before you go insane.
My apologies, I'm already insane anyway.

*waddles off*
User avatar
Alyeska
Federation Ambassador
Posts: 17496
Joined: 2002-08-11 07:28pm
Location: Montana, USA

Post by Alyeska »

SirNitram wrote:
Admiral Valdemar wrote:I thought my post was mildly on topic. *shrug*

Still, point remains, these people still use that argument.
Uh, dude, it's totally off-topic. The point of the thread is what could be disproven in the future. Please read the first post before you go insane.
It looks on topic to me. A typical creationist ploy is to point out science has been wrong.
"If the facts are on your side, pound on the facts. If the law is on your side, pound on the law. If neither is on your side, pound on the table."

"The captain claimed our people violated a 4,000 year old treaty forbidding us to develop hyperspace technology. Extermination of our planet was the consequence. The subject did not survive interrogation."
User avatar
Rye
To Mega Therion
Posts: 12493
Joined: 2003-03-08 07:48am
Location: Uighur, please!

Post by Rye »

Alyeska wrote:
It looks on topic to me. A typical creationist ploy is to point out science has been wrong.
yes...but still the point remains this thread has nothing to do with creationism.
EBC|Fucking Metal|Artist|Androgynous Sexfiend|Gozer Kvltist|
Listen to my music! http://www.soundclick.com/nihilanth
"America is, now, the most powerful and economically prosperous nation in the country." - Master of Ossus
User avatar
AdmiralKanos
Lex Animata
Lex Animata
Posts: 2648
Joined: 2002-07-02 11:36pm
Location: Toronto, Ontario

Post by AdmiralKanos »

The mentality of the "scientists know nothing" attitude which is heard from creationists, mysticists, and quacks of all kinds stems from a fundamental misunderstanding of science.

People think in terms of black and white; something is either correct or incorrect. If they are not absolutely sure that it is correct, they conclude that it could very well be total bullshit, and that's their approach to science. Whenever it says something they don't want to hear, they simply say "well, it's not guaranteed correct so it could be total bullshit". And since nothing is really guaranteed true, this leads to solypsism.

But on a more fundamental level, it's a problem of psychological approach. If we simply replace "correct vs incorrect" with "degrees of accuracy", the scientific approach makes perfect sense and the holes in this reasoning become obvious.

Think of the analogy of a sculpture. The sculptor starts with an ugly lump of clay or chunk of rock etc., and has an object (let's say it's an apple) that he wants to model. When he starts, the lump bears no resemblance to the apple. As he works, and works, and works some more, the lump begins to resemble the apple much more closely. In theory, with enough technology and effort, he might be able to produce a model of the apple which is visually indistinguishable from the original. At the very least, he can certainly make it a very good replica.

And that's the same thing science does; it started with nothing, and slowly worked its way toward a better model. The naysayers claim that it's not guaranteed true (this is like a critic saying to the sculptor that it still doesn't look EXACTLY like the apple), but it's certainly very close, much closer than it was before. And if you trot out some wild alternative theory (analogous to pulling out another lump of clay) and claim that it has just as much claim on truth as the highly refined model because neither is perfect, you are engaging in a black/white fallacy.

So, it's not a matter of how much science "knows". It's a matter of how accurate the model is, and right now it's pretty damned accurate. Not perfect, but accurate enough for us to predict things as small as the movement of electrons and as large as the birth of stars with good accuracy.
For a time, I considered sparing your wretched little planet Cybertron.
But now, you shall witnesss ... its dismemberment!

Image
"This is what happens when you use trivia napkins for research material"- Sea Skimmer on "Pearl Harbour".
"Do you work out? Your hands are so strong! Especially the right one!"- spoken to Bud Bundy
User avatar
Queeb Salaron
Jedi Council Member
Posts: 2337
Joined: 2003-03-12 12:45am
Location: Left of center.

Post by Queeb Salaron »

I think that there will be some great Newtonian physics law that will be disproven sometime in the future, or at least a law that will be revised to the point where it only slightly resembles Newton's theories.

::Smiles:: Personally, I like it when scientific theories are disproven. Especially in the field of medicine. The Kenneth Bianchi trial all but disproved the effectiveness of hypnotherapy. When I watched the reactions of the guys who initially tested him, they were shocked and appalled that their precious theories had been totally uprooted. It was great. :)
Proud owner of The Fleshlight
G.A.L.E. Force - Bisexual Airborn Division
SDnet Resident Psycho Clown

"I hear and behold God in every object, yet I understand God not in the least, / Nor do I understand who there can be more wonderful than myself."
--Whitman

Fucking Funny.
User avatar
Darth Wong
Sith Lord
Sith Lord
Posts: 70028
Joined: 2002-07-03 12:25am
Location: Toronto, Canada
Contact:

Post by Darth Wong »

Queeb Salaron wrote:I think that there will be some great Newtonian physics law that will be disproven sometime in the future, or at least a law that will be revised to the point where it only slightly resembles Newton's theories.
That would be quite a shock, since its predictions would have to closely resemble Newton's theories in the regimes for which they are applicable today, otherwise it would be inconsistent with the entire body of observed kinematic evidence.
::Smiles:: Personally, I like it when scientific theories are disproven. Especially in the field of medicine. The Kenneth Bianchi trial all but disproved the effectiveness of hypnotherapy. When I watched the reactions of the guys who initially tested him, they were shocked and appalled that their precious theories had been totally uprooted. It was great. :)
Medical science has not progressed to anywhere near the level of accuracy that physics has. It is more like reverse-engineering.
Image
"It's not evil for God to do it. Or for someone to do it at God's command."- Jonathan Boyd on baby-killing

"you guys are fascinated with the use of those "rules of logic" to the extent that you don't really want to discussus anything."- GC

"I do not believe Russian Roulette is a stupid act" - Embracer of Darkness

"Viagra commercials appear to save lives" - tharkûn on US health care.

http://www.stardestroyer.net/Mike/RantMode/Blurbs.html
User avatar
Queeb Salaron
Jedi Council Member
Posts: 2337
Joined: 2003-03-12 12:45am
Location: Left of center.

Post by Queeb Salaron »

Darth Wong wrote:That would be quite a shock, since its predictions would have to closely resemble Newton's theories in the regimes for which they are applicable today, otherwise it would be inconsistent with the entire body of observed kinematic evidence.
Yes, but what if (and this is a HUGE what-if) we attributed certain forces as being applied by one thing, when in fact they were applied by something different? Say, for example, that centripetal acceleration was not caused by the rotation of an object, but rather by some other force that we "missed" or discarded as negligible? It's just an example, of course.
Medical science has not progressed to anywhere near the level of accuracy that physics has. It is more like reverse-engineering.
Oh, I know. If medical science were anywhere near as well-developed as physics, we'd have a universal cure for all viral-based infections. [/Speculation]

And physics has a drastically lower frequency of theory disproof, which is why I like keeping an eye on medical developments more than I like watching developments in the world of physics.
Proud owner of The Fleshlight
G.A.L.E. Force - Bisexual Airborn Division
SDnet Resident Psycho Clown

"I hear and behold God in every object, yet I understand God not in the least, / Nor do I understand who there can be more wonderful than myself."
--Whitman

Fucking Funny.
User avatar
Admiral Valdemar
Outside Context Problem
Posts: 31572
Joined: 2002-07-04 07:17pm
Location: UK

Post by Admiral Valdemar »

Medical science and biology in general is very much like reverse engineering since we're essentially writing up the manuals on how organisms that have had millions of years to perfect themselves, work.

It's like giving an engineer the most complicated machine known to man and saying "Now, tell us how it all fits together and works."
User avatar
UltraViolence83
Jedi Master
Posts: 1120
Joined: 2003-01-12 04:59pm
Location: Youngstown, Ohio, USA

Post by UltraViolence83 »

The only real very accurate scientific theory I want to see smashed is the "Nothing beyond speed of light" rule. But I'm sure every self-respecting sci-fi fan will agree with me on that. 8)

Someday...perhaps... :cry:
...This would sharpen you up and make you ready for a bit of the old...ultraviolence.
User avatar
Queeb Salaron
Jedi Council Member
Posts: 2337
Joined: 2003-03-12 12:45am
Location: Left of center.

Post by Queeb Salaron »

Admiral Valdemar wrote:Medical science and biology in general is very much like reverse engineering since we're essentially writing up the manuals on how organisms that have had millions of years to perfect themselves, work.

It's like giving an engineer the most complicated machine known to man and saying "Now, tell us how it all fits together and works."
"And oh by the way, wheile you're figuring it out, we're gonna make it more and more complex."
Proud owner of The Fleshlight
G.A.L.E. Force - Bisexual Airborn Division
SDnet Resident Psycho Clown

"I hear and behold God in every object, yet I understand God not in the least, / Nor do I understand who there can be more wonderful than myself."
--Whitman

Fucking Funny.
User avatar
UltraViolence83
Jedi Master
Posts: 1120
Joined: 2003-01-12 04:59pm
Location: Youngstown, Ohio, USA

Post by UltraViolence83 »

Queeb Salaron wrote:
Admiral Valdemar wrote:Medical science and biology in general is very much like reverse engineering since we're essentially writing up the manuals on how organisms that have had millions of years to perfect themselves, work.

It's like giving an engineer the most complicated machine known to man and saying "Now, tell us how it all fits together and works."
"And oh by the way, wheile you're figuring it out, we're gonna make it more and more complex."
"Oh, and if you can, try to make it bigger and better."
...This would sharpen you up and make you ready for a bit of the old...ultraviolence.
User avatar
Admiral Valdemar
Outside Context Problem
Posts: 31572
Joined: 2002-07-04 07:17pm
Location: UK

Post by Admiral Valdemar »

"Every man knows that bigger is always better!"
-Lt. Britain, Dominion Tank Police
User avatar
AdmiralKanos
Lex Animata
Lex Animata
Posts: 2648
Joined: 2002-07-02 11:36pm
Location: Toronto, Ontario

Post by AdmiralKanos »

Queeb Salaron wrote:
Darth Wong wrote:That would be quite a shock, since its predictions would have to closely resemble Newton's theories in the regimes for which they are applicable today, otherwise it would be inconsistent with the entire body of observed kinematic evidence.
Yes, but what if (and this is a HUGE what-if) we attributed certain forces as being applied by one thing, when in fact they were applied by something different? Say, for example, that centripetal acceleration was not caused by the rotation of an object, but rather by some other force that we "missed" or discarded as negligible? It's just an example, of course.
Um ... you DO realize that centripetal acceleration is a GEOMETRIC concept, right? It is impossible to move in a straight line around a circle; I suggest you think harder about what you're saying.
Oh, I know. If medical science were anywhere near as well-developed as physics, we'd have a universal cure for all viral-based infections. [/Speculation]

And physics has a drastically lower frequency of theory disproof, which is why I like keeping an eye on medical developments more than I like watching developments in the world of physics.
Medicine is a messy business, to be sure.
For a time, I considered sparing your wretched little planet Cybertron.
But now, you shall witnesss ... its dismemberment!

Image
"This is what happens when you use trivia napkins for research material"- Sea Skimmer on "Pearl Harbour".
"Do you work out? Your hands are so strong! Especially the right one!"- spoken to Bud Bundy
User avatar
SPOOFE
Sith Devotee
Posts: 3174
Joined: 2002-07-03 07:34pm
Location: Woodland Hills, CA
Contact:

Post by SPOOFE »

The thing about science is that it is a process, not an instruction manual. "Science" doesn't say anything... it doesn't mention anything about evolution or astrophysics or biology or anything. It is simply a set of rules used to observe phenomena and come up with explanations. To say that "science has been wrong before" betrays a gross ignorance... since one of the rules of the scientific method is to incorporate all observations for the final theory. If a new observation comes along that disproves a previous theory, this new observation is simply added in and a new theory made.

Ergo, science has yet to be wrong. It's just that those who use the scientific method have had instances where they didn't have all the evidence.
The Great and Malignant
User avatar
Grand Admiral Thrawn
Ruthless Imperial Tyrant
Posts: 5755
Joined: 2002-07-03 06:11pm
Location: Canada

Post by Grand Admiral Thrawn »

Newtonian laws are pretty much here to stay. While they don't work always (GPS would be off without relativity) does a rocket work? Does a rocket randomly start and stop moving? Does an apple fall?
"You know, I was God once."
"Yes, I saw. You were doing well, until everyone died."
Bender and God, Futurama
User avatar
Trytostaydead
Sith Marauder
Posts: 3690
Joined: 2003-01-28 09:34pm

Post by Trytostaydead »

EVERYTHING can change. Science CONSTANTLY changes as we give birth to a genius and develop new insights and observational techniques.
User avatar
DPDarkPrimus
Emperor's Hand
Posts: 18399
Joined: 2002-11-22 11:02pm
Location: Iowa
Contact:

Post by DPDarkPrimus »

Of course, a good quick retort is "God has been wrong before as well", and cite contradictory material from the Bible.
Mayabird is my girlfriend
Justice League:BotM:MM:SDnet City Watch:Cybertron's Finest
"Well then, science is bullshit. "
-revprez, with yet another brilliant rebuttal.
Post Reply