A debate

SLAM: debunk creationism, pseudoscience, and superstitions. Discuss logic and morality.

Moderator: Alyrium Denryle

Post Reply
God Emperor
Jedi Knight
Posts: 637
Joined: 2002-11-18 08:10pm
Location: somewhere I don't want to be

A debate

Post by God Emperor »

Well I've entered into a debate on another forum and I get some people talking about some books that prove god exists, so has any one heard of these:
Many people have gone to great effort to prove that God exists. A couple of good books on the subject are The New Evidence that Demands a Verdict, by Josh McDowell, and The Case for Christ, by (I think) Stroebel.
and this one
Another good book is "When Skeptics Ask" by Norman Geisler.
Any help will be great.
Ph'nglui mglw'nafh Cthulhu R'lyeh wgah'nagl fhtagn

I know that you believe that you understood what you think I said, but I am not sure you realize that what you heard is not what I meant.
User avatar
Rye
To Mega Therion
Posts: 12493
Joined: 2003-03-08 07:48am
Location: Uighur, please!

Post by Rye »

The only thing that could prove any god's existence would be some kind of evidence to logically point to any gods and then specific god/s. No such evidence exists.

Therefore, it's strictly a personal thing whether you believe in gods or not. I'm fine with that, but it has no basis logically or scientifically.
EBC|Fucking Metal|Artist|Androgynous Sexfiend|Gozer Kvltist|
Listen to my music! http://www.soundclick.com/nihilanth
"America is, now, the most powerful and economically prosperous nation in the country." - Master of Ossus
User avatar
Wicked Pilot
Moderator Emeritus
Posts: 8972
Joined: 2002-07-05 05:45pm

Post by Wicked Pilot »

That is a classice appeal to authority fallicy. Tell them to quick pointing to books and saying "Ah Ha! This prooves it." It is not your job to go do their homework. Tell them to give the arguements from the literature themselves or shut the fuck up. If they persist, start naming off books disproving the existance of gods.
The most basic assumption about the world is that it does not contradict itself.
God Emperor
Jedi Knight
Posts: 637
Joined: 2002-11-18 08:10pm
Location: somewhere I don't want to be

Post by God Emperor »

I already asked for qoutes, and I'm a little ignorant on the subject, what books would help me?
Ph'nglui mglw'nafh Cthulhu R'lyeh wgah'nagl fhtagn

I know that you believe that you understood what you think I said, but I am not sure you realize that what you heard is not what I meant.
Enforcer Talen
Warlock
Posts: 10285
Joined: 2002-07-05 02:28am
Location: Boston
Contact:

Post by Enforcer Talen »

ask for proof.

that kills debates 90% off the bat.
Image
This day is Fantastic!
Myers Briggs: ENTJ
Political Compass: -3/-6
DOOMer WoW
"I really hate it when the guy you were pegging as Mr. Worst Case starts saying, "Oh, I was wrong, it's going to be much worse." " - Adrian Laguna
User avatar
Wicked Pilot
Moderator Emeritus
Posts: 8972
Joined: 2002-07-05 05:45pm

Post by Wicked Pilot »

Enforcer Talen wrote:ask for proof.
The dillema God Emperor is facing is that the opponents are responding to proof request by simply pointing to a book and saying it holds the proof of diety without making any arguements themselves.
The most basic assumption about the world is that it does not contradict itself.
Post Reply