Physics Nobel Prize 2002

SLAM: debunk creationism, pseudoscience, and superstitions. Discuss logic and morality.

Moderator: Alyrium Denryle

Post Reply
User avatar
kheegster
Jedi Council Member
Posts: 2397
Joined: 2002-09-14 02:29am
Location: An oasis in the wastelands of NJ

Physics Nobel Prize 2002

Post by kheegster »

http://www.nobel.se/physics/laureates/2002/

This year it looks like in the absence of worthy contemporary research, they've had to give away the Nobel Physics prize to decades-old research. It does strike me as if they want to give the prizes to these fellas before they kick the bucket. This stuff is so old that I've sort of taken for granted the existence of neutrinos and cosmic x-rays. Oh well, Einstein did have to wait 15 years for his Nobel as well.

KG
ps any other physicists around here?
Articles, opinions and rants from an astrophysicist: Cosmic Journeys
User avatar
Durandal
Bile-Driven Hate Machine
Posts: 17927
Joined: 2002-07-03 06:26pm
Location: Silicon Valley, CA
Contact:

Post by Durandal »

I'm studying to be one.
Damien Sorresso

"Ever see what them computa bitchez do to numbas? It ain't natural. Numbas ain't supposed to be code, they supposed to quantify shit."
- The Onion
User avatar
Lord Edam
Padawan Learner
Posts: 189
Joined: 2002-07-18 08:52am
Contact:

Re: Physics Nobel Prize 2002

Post by Lord Edam »

kheegan wrote:http://www.nobel.se/physics/laureates/2002/

This year it looks like in the absence of worthy contemporary research, they've had to give away the Nobel Physics prize to decades-old research.
nobel prizes are often given for "decades old research" rather than recent stuff, because very often the importance of the original work is only realised after recent advancements.

It took 20 years for Lev Landau to be recognised for his work on quantum fluids
Most of the work that won Chandreskhar the prize in 83 was from the 20's/30's, and it was only due to advances by other (now probably more famous) physicists in the late 70s that people realised his work was truly deserving of recognition (one of the few physicists awarded the prize postumhously IIRC)

It doesn't matter how old the research is - if it's important why not recognise it as such? This year's nobel laureates did work that has been key in several major physics advancements in recent years. They just did it a few years before people were capable of realising what it meant.
Captain Hornblower
Youngling
Posts: 57
Joined: 2002-07-19 11:05pm
Location: Somewhere in Arizona

Post by Captain Hornblower »

I am a physicist working as an overpaid engineer, does that count?
"You couldn't possibly have passed high school physics!"

"If life hands you poop, make poop juice"
User avatar
kheegster
Jedi Council Member
Posts: 2397
Joined: 2002-09-14 02:29am
Location: An oasis in the wastelands of NJ

Post by kheegster »

I'm only a first year physics undergrad myself...I meant physicist in the more general meaning.

I wasn't really criticising the late awardance of the Nobel Prizes, just more concerned that such delays might mean some discoveries might go unrewarded because their discoverers have passed away. Then they would not be around to enjoy the recognition.

I wonder when Stephen Hawking will get his Nobel...I'm not sure he has that many years left. Most of the scientific community is in agreement that most of his work is valid, although not verifiable by experiment. Probably the committee is too nervous about awarding a prize that might later be debunked.

KG
Articles, opinions and rants from an astrophysicist: Cosmic Journeys
Asst. Asst. Lt. Cmdr. Smi
What Kind of Username is That?
Posts: 9254
Joined: 2002-07-10 08:53pm
Location: Back in PA

Post by Asst. Asst. Lt. Cmdr. Smi »

I want to have a physics degree, but I'm not in college yet. I also want to study quantum mechanics, and perhaps chemistry. I never said I would get them, however.
BotM: Just another monkey|HAB
Post Reply