Reaction Mass for Starships

SLAM: debunk creationism, pseudoscience, and superstitions. Discuss logic and morality.

Moderator: Alyrium Denryle

Post Reply
User avatar
Kitsune
Sith Devotee
Posts: 3412
Joined: 2003-04-05 10:52pm
Location: Foxes Den
Contact:

Reaction Mass for Starships

Post by Kitsune »

I am currious, assuming starships with fusion reactors and so type of ion engine, woudl teh engine and teh reactor likely share the same bunkerage or would they be seperate?
"He that would make his own liberty secure must guard even his enemy from oppression; for if he violates this duty, he establishes a precedent that will reach to himself."
Thomas Paine

"For the living know that they shall die: but the dead know not any thing, neither have they any more a reward; for the memory of them is forgotten."
Ecclesiastes 9:5 (KJV)
User avatar
Admiral Valdemar
Outside Context Problem
Posts: 31572
Joined: 2002-07-04 07:17pm
Location: UK

Post by Admiral Valdemar »

This depends on the design. The VASIMR fusion drive can use the reactor mass as propellant, or you can have a separate system using another element to be heated and ejected. Most would likely vouch for direct approach as it is simpler, but if you can get the propellant to fuse as well when ejected, then you get additional power going back to the grid on the ship and achieve higher particle velocities.
Post Reply