"Oh N0es! T3h EV1L GAY AGENDA!!!1" at Protest Warr

Einhander Sn0m4n · Post by **Einhander Sn0m4n** » 2005-10-24 02:44pm

+FLASH_SUPPRESSOR+http://forum.protestwarrior.com/viewtopic.php?t=110504

Charge up your sense of humor before clicking. Thanks for spotting this, Rogue 9.

Rogue 9 · Post by **Rogue 9** » 2005-10-24 02:51pm

Heh. You're welcome. I'm wading into the fray now; there's already a pretty healthy flamewar going on.

Post by **Dalton** » 2005-10-24 03:28pm

Equal rights is not an agenda. Oppression of them is.

The Spartan · Post by **The Spartan** » 2005-10-24 03:46pm

Jesus fucking Christ that was painful to read.

"The majority supports me so I'm right."
"Giving gays equal rights is tyrrany."

How can you be this fucking stupid and understand the complexities of operating a goddamn computer? Or breathing?

Dorsk 81 · Post by **Dorsk 81** » 2005-10-24 04:38pm

I don't know why exactly, but I couldn't stop laughing after reading this:

The Teflon Master wrote:THE GAY AGENDA IS REAL

Now all he's gotta do is click his heels together three times, and it might just happen.

Rogue 9 · Post by **Rogue 9** » 2005-10-24 04:40pm

Damn, they get dumber every time. One compared the gay agenda to the Nazi agenda, and I asked him when the Gaymacht had blitzed Poland, because I hadn't noticed. And now dear old Ataru is trying to discredit me by calling me "Star Wars nerd," like he does every time he starts to lose.

Akhlut · Post by **Akhlut** » 2005-10-24 04:51pm

Dorsk 81 wrote:I don't know why exactly, but I couldn't stop laughing after reading this:

The Teflon Master wrote:THE GAY AGENDA IS REAL
Now all he's gotta do is click his heels together three times, and it might just happen.

But, it is! I found it! It's right here!!1!!

Seriuosly, though, I gotta wonder what's so horrifically awful with civil rights for gay people.

Zero · Post by **Zero** » 2005-10-24 04:57pm

The gay agenda is real. I don't see why this should be surprising, or bad. There's a conservative agenda too. I also have my own agenda. We all do.

Definition of Agenda wrote:A list or program of things to be done or considered.

The conservative agenda in this case is to maintain a block between gays and their civil liberties, whereas the gay agenda is simply to be treated as equals, and be allowed to marry those they love. The consideration isn't in the fact that an agenda exists, but rather in which agenda is more harmfull to society. In this case, to most rational people, the choice is obvious.

Rogue 9 · Post by **Rogue 9** » 2005-10-24 05:04pm

Akhlut wrote:
Dorsk 81 wrote:I don't know why exactly, but I couldn't stop laughing after reading this:

The Teflon Master wrote:THE GAY AGENDA IS REAL
Now all he's gotta do is click his heels together three times, and it might just happen.
But, it is! I found it! It's right here!!1!!

Seriuosly, though, I gotta wonder what's so horrifically awful with civil rights for gay people.

Hehehehehehehehe. Thanks.

+http://forum.protestwarrior.com/viewtop ... 5#10010135

Duckie · Post by **Duckie** » 2005-10-24 05:10pm

Dear God, I'm almost sick after reading the sheer unadulterated stupidity displayed within. Did anyone catch someone stating that since Washington's values were equivilent to today's values, Washington was conservative for his time? Or that slave-holding was a liberal value?

Even reading that these people exist makes me want to immigrate, but I don't speak a word of any other language. To England, I guess. Or Canada.

Psycho Smiley · Post by **Psycho Smiley** » 2005-10-24 06:09pm

Are they actually arguing that if marriage gets redefined, all previous marriages instantly become legally and morally null and void?

Rogue 9 · Post by **Rogue 9** » 2005-10-24 06:23pm

Psycho Smiley wrote:

Are they actually arguing that if marriage gets redefined, all previous marriages instantly become legally and morally null and void?

One of them is at least; I'm trying to figure that one out myself.

Psycho Smiley · Post by **Psycho Smiley** » 2005-10-24 08:17pm

Rogue 9 wrote:
Psycho Smiley wrote:Are they actually arguing that if marriage gets redefined, all previous marriages instantly become legally and morally null and void?
One of them is at least; I'm trying to figure that one out myself.

More of them seem to be jumping on that bandwagon. I've seen stupid shit asserted before, but this is in the top five at least.

Metatwaddle · Post by **Metatwaddle** » 2005-10-24 08:18pm

Akhlut wrote:
Dorsk 81 wrote:I don't know why exactly, but I couldn't stop laughing after reading this:

The Teflon Master wrote:THE GAY AGENDA IS REAL
Now all he's gotta do is click his heels together three times, and it might just happen.
But, it is! I found it! It's right here!!1!!

Bah. I think this gay agenda is far superior; in fact I clicked on this thread for the exclusive purpose of showing you guys this. My personal favorites are "Replace all school counselors in grades K-12 with agents of Colombian and Jamaican drug cartels" and "Establish planetary chain of homo breeding gulags where over-medicated imprisoned straight women are turned into artificially impregnated baby factories to produce prepubescent love slaves for our devotedly pederastic gay leadership".

As for the original post by Conservative Hero (if I weren't going to get flamed by our resident rational libertarians I'd call that an oxymoron), urgh. I think the writer of that article is accusing the "gay movement" of much more diabolical thought than they've actually used. Also, CH is fucking retarded.

Post by **Gandalf** » 2005-10-24 08:25pm

1. I can finally view this site, which is good for me. Usually I get told that I was banned and therefore can't view it.

2. How many of these people are posting in jest?

The Spartan · Post by **The Spartan** » 2005-10-24 09:59pm

Fuck, I can't even keep track of who's argueing what anymore without going back and reading the begining of the fucking thread.

Post by **fgalkin** » 2005-10-24 10:02pm

And that, my friends, is why I left their forums long ago.

Have a very nice day.
-fgalkin

Dominus Atheos · Post by **Dominus Atheos** » 2005-10-24 10:48pm

I really don't feel like registering with a bunch of idiots like that, so can someone please post this picture there?

Rogue 9 · Post by **Rogue 9** » 2005-10-24 11:19pm

Gandalf wrote:1. I can finally view this site, which is good for me. Usually I get told that I was banned and therefore can't view it.

2. How many of these people are posting in jest?

1. About time.

2. Sadly, probably not that many. There are a few, but most people in that flamewar, on both sides, believe what they're saying unless I'm greatly deceived.

DPDarkPrimus · Post by **DPDarkPrimus** » 2005-10-24 11:41pm

Rogue 9 wrote:
Psycho Smiley wrote:

Are they actually arguing that if marriage gets redefined, all previous marriages instantly become legally and morally null and void?
One of them is at least; I'm trying to figure that one out myself.

Same reason they think removing "In God We Trust" from our currency invalidates all currency currently in circulation.

Rogue 9 · Post by **Rogue 9** » 2005-10-25 12:02am

Right, I've had enough. I'm hitting them where it hurts; in their highly prized individual freedoms spiel. I expect to accept many concessions shortly after getting handwaving in response.

SirNitram · Post by **SirNitram** » 2005-10-25 12:13am

Rogue 9 wrote:Right, I've had enough. I'm hitting them where it hurts; in their highly prized individual freedoms spiel. I expect to accept many concessions shortly after getting handwaving in response.

Here's my doubting any of them will concede. You've hit the hypocrisy of true idiots, and it doesn't give just because you show it's contradictory.

DPDarkPrimus · Post by **DPDarkPrimus** » 2005-10-25 01:41am

SirNitram wrote:
Rogue 9 wrote:Right, I've had enough. I'm hitting them where it hurts; in their highly prized individual freedoms spiel. I expect to accept many concessions shortly after getting handwaving in response.
Here's my doubting any of them will concede. You've hit the hypocrisy of true idiots, and it doesn't give just because you show it's contradictory.

Hey, they might run away never to return. With the help of the knowledgable folks here at SDnet, I managed to chase off a longtime fuckwit off of Postwarrior. (But I don't post there anymore, it got tiring.)

Rogue 9 · Post by **Rogue 9** » 2005-10-25 02:10am

Who, REV.? He's back with a vengeance.

Post by **fgalkin** » 2005-10-25 02:29am

Ooh, you clashed with REV? After a few posts, he called me the spawn of Satan, told me I'll burn in hell, and promised to never respond to any post of mine. Then came the ignore function, and I was finally rid of him.

Have a very nice day.
-fgalkin