Fire vs. Handgrenade

SLAM: debunk creationism, pseudoscience, and superstitions. Discuss logic and morality.

Moderator: Alyrium Denryle

User avatar
Shroom Man 777
FUCKING DICK-STABBER!
Posts: 21222
Joined: 2003-05-11 08:39am
Location: Bleeding breasts and stabbing dicks since 2003
Contact:

Fire vs. Handgrenade

Post by Shroom Man 777 »

Just a simple moronic question. If there was a fire, not a really big one, but big enough to be a sizeable impedement, and I chuck a hand grenade into it, what happens? There's an explosion, yeah, but does it kill the fire?
Image "DO YOU WORSHIP HOMOSEXUALS?" - Curtis Saxton (source)
shroom is a lovely boy and i wont hear a bad word against him - LUSY-CHAN!
Shit! Man, I didn't think of that! It took Shroom to properly interpret the screams of dying people :D - PeZook
Shroom, I read out the stuff you write about us. You are an endless supply of morale down here. :p - an OWS street medic
Pink Sugar Heart Attack!
User avatar
kheegster
Jedi Council Member
Posts: 2397
Joined: 2002-09-14 02:29am
Location: An oasis in the wastelands of NJ

Post by kheegster »

I doubt it, since the explosive charge in a typical hand grenade isn't much at all, since they derive their killing power from fragmenting into tiny pieces of shrapnel.
Articles, opinions and rants from an astrophysicist: Cosmic Journeys
User avatar
Admiral Valdemar
Outside Context Problem
Posts: 31572
Joined: 2002-07-04 07:17pm
Location: UK

Post by Admiral Valdemar »

Chuck a few sticks of TNT in. That'll stop the fire. And likely make whatever the fire was destroying that you wanted to save a nice crater to boot.
User avatar
Stofsk
Emperor's Hand
Posts: 12925
Joined: 2003-11-10 12:36am

Post by Stofsk »

Admiral Valdemar wrote:Chuck a few sticks of TNT in. That'll stop the fire. And likely make whatever the fire was destroying that you wanted to save a nice crater to boot.
Fight fire with fire.
User avatar
AMX
Jedi Knight
Posts: 853
Joined: 2004-09-30 06:43am

Post by AMX »

Admiral Valdemar wrote:Chuck a few sticks of TNT in. That'll stop the fire. And likely make whatever the fire was destroying that you wanted to save a nice crater to boot.
Bad idea.
If you don't have a proper detonator in there, chances are the TNT will burn, rather than explode.
User avatar
Azazal
Jedi Council Member
Posts: 1534
Joined: 2005-12-19 02:02pm
Location: Hunting xeno scum

Post by Azazal »

Admiral Valdemar wrote:Chuck a few sticks of TNT in. That'll stop the fire. And likely make whatever the fire was destroying that you wanted to save a nice crater to boot.
Showing once again that there is no problem that high explosives can't solve 8)
Image
User avatar
kc8tbe
Padawan Learner
Posts: 150
Joined: 2005-02-05 12:58pm
Location: Cincinnati, OH

Post by kc8tbe »

Not a moronic question at all. I think you've actually got a chance if you through the hand grenade at the base of the fire.

If this fire is a combustion reaction, it requires three things to "live":
1. Oxygen
2. Fuel
3. Heat

By throwing an explosive into the fire, you could hope to do two things.
1. Displace a large amount of oxygen in the explosion, enough to snuff out the fire (like blowing a candle out). I don't think your hand grenade is big enough to do this, though the TNT might work.
2. If the grenade makes it to the base of the fire, the explosion might drive some of the fuel out of the heat of the fire. Like spreading the remains of a campfire around with a poker.
Bad idea.
If you don't have a proper detonator in there, chances are the TNT will burn, rather than explode.
A valid concern. The byproducts from burning a stick of TNT include nitrogen oxides, which are quite toxic.
User avatar
Deathstalker
Jedi Council Member
Posts: 1523
Joined: 2004-01-20 02:22am

Post by Deathstalker »

Using explosives is how oil well fires are blown out and capped. An explosive charge is dropped into the fire then detonated, using up the oxygen.

A fragmentation grenade doesn't have much explosive power most likely only having a chance of effecting small fires. Thermite grenades are right out of course!
Image
User avatar
Admiral Valdemar
Outside Context Problem
Posts: 31572
Joined: 2002-07-04 07:17pm
Location: UK

Post by Admiral Valdemar »

Pfft, you'd obviously have the sticks fuzed and lit as they were thrown, then they'd go off hopefully before they melt. Or you can just chuck a vial of nitro in. That'd be fun.
Deathstalker wrote:Using explosives is how oil well fires are blown out and capped. An explosive charge is dropped into the fire then detonated, using up the oxygen.

A fragmentation grenade doesn't have much explosive power most likely only having a chance of effecting small fires. Thermite grenades are right out of course!
The Thunderbirds episode "Terror In New York City" (the one with the moving of the Empire State Building) opens with an oil well fire in the US where the Firefly'dozer fires an explosive charge into the inferno. The blast blows out the fire and the oil flows free. That's pretty much the only way to stop such intense blazes short of cutting off the supply of fuel somehow or using halon gas bombs.
User avatar
Deathstalker
Jedi Council Member
Posts: 1523
Joined: 2004-01-20 02:22am

Post by Deathstalker »

"Hellfighters" with the Duke and Jim Hutton is about a company that handles oil well fires.
Image
User avatar
Shroom Man 777
FUCKING DICK-STABBER!
Posts: 21222
Joined: 2003-05-11 08:39am
Location: Bleeding breasts and stabbing dicks since 2003
Contact:

Post by Shroom Man 777 »

How about an HE grenade? Or do these only exist in counterstrike...?
Image "DO YOU WORSHIP HOMOSEXUALS?" - Curtis Saxton (source)
shroom is a lovely boy and i wont hear a bad word against him - LUSY-CHAN!
Shit! Man, I didn't think of that! It took Shroom to properly interpret the screams of dying people :D - PeZook
Shroom, I read out the stuff you write about us. You are an endless supply of morale down here. :p - an OWS street medic
Pink Sugar Heart Attack!
User avatar
Deathstalker
Jedi Council Member
Posts: 1523
Joined: 2004-01-20 02:22am

Post by Deathstalker »

Here is a link for US grenades

Things that go BOOM!

HE hand grenades are not useful, because the explosion isn't focused very well. Better to use explosives for destroying things.

However Make things go BOOM farther away

40mm grenades have HE rounds, which are really just hopped up frag grenades.

Safety tip, do not use Mk19 rounds in a M203 launcher.
Image
User avatar
Darth Wong
Sith Lord
Sith Lord
Posts: 70028
Joined: 2002-07-03 12:25am
Location: Toronto, Canada
Contact:

Post by Darth Wong »

Does anyone know what kind of overpressure is required to blow out a fire?
Image
"It's not evil for God to do it. Or for someone to do it at God's command."- Jonathan Boyd on baby-killing

"you guys are fascinated with the use of those "rules of logic" to the extent that you don't really want to discussus anything."- GC

"I do not believe Russian Roulette is a stupid act" - Embracer of Darkness

"Viagra commercials appear to save lives" - tharkûn on US health care.

http://www.stardestroyer.net/Mike/RantMode/Blurbs.html
User avatar
Admiral Valdemar
Outside Context Problem
Posts: 31572
Joined: 2002-07-04 07:17pm
Location: UK

Post by Admiral Valdemar »

That really depends on many variabilities within the scenario, such as what fuels the fire, how much open space is available and so on. I'll see if I can look anything up, but it would take quite a bit of HE to stop something like an oil well, compared to a paper warehouse.
User avatar
Sea Skimmer
Yankee Capitalist Air Pirate
Posts: 37390
Joined: 2002-07-03 11:49pm
Location: Passchendaele City, HAB

Re: Fire vs. Handgrenade

Post by Sea Skimmer »

Shroom Man 777 wrote:Just a simple moronic question. If there was a fire, not a really big one, but big enough to be a sizeable impedement, and I chuck a hand grenade into it, what happens? There's an explosion, yeah, but does it kill the fire?
A hand grenade is a pretty substantial explosion at close range, especially if it was a concussion grenade, which has eight times more then the average of about 1oz of explosive in fragmentation grenades. Fire would be blown out a very short distance away, but then it might just reignite from the latent heat and any remaining flame would quickly spread the fire back. Grenades are something to start fires with, using one to put out a fight is not something I’d ever consider. When you use explosives to blow of things like oil fires, its very important that the blast be in the AIR above the fire, throwing a grenade doesn’t give you that.
"This cult of special forces is as sensible as to form a Royal Corps of Tree Climbers and say that no soldier who does not wear its green hat with a bunch of oak leaves stuck in it should be expected to climb a tree"
— Field Marshal William Slim 1956
User avatar
Darth Wong
Sith Lord
Sith Lord
Posts: 70028
Joined: 2002-07-03 12:25am
Location: Toronto, Canada
Contact:

Post by Darth Wong »

TNT would use up a lot of oxygen during the afterburn because it's such a chemically underoxidized explosive, but I don't know if that would outweigh the detrimental effect of the TNT generating its own fireball in the process. It would be nice to know exactly what types and sizes of explosive charges they used when putting out oil fires in this manner.
Image
"It's not evil for God to do it. Or for someone to do it at God's command."- Jonathan Boyd on baby-killing

"you guys are fascinated with the use of those "rules of logic" to the extent that you don't really want to discussus anything."- GC

"I do not believe Russian Roulette is a stupid act" - Embracer of Darkness

"Viagra commercials appear to save lives" - tharkûn on US health care.

http://www.stardestroyer.net/Mike/RantMode/Blurbs.html
User avatar
Admiral Valdemar
Outside Context Problem
Posts: 31572
Joined: 2002-07-04 07:17pm
Location: UK

Post by Admiral Valdemar »

I have a friend who's a part time fireman (and my barber), I'll ask next time I'm in, probably this week, if he or his colleagues know anything on this kind of thing. They've trained at airports before which deal with kerosene fires, so potentially someone knows about more exotic fire hazards and dealing with them.
User avatar
aerius
Charismatic Cult Leader
Posts: 14800
Joined: 2002-08-18 07:27pm

Post by aerius »

Darth Wong wrote:TNT would use up a lot of oxygen during the afterburn because it's such a chemically underoxidized explosive, but I don't know if that would outweigh the detrimental effect of the TNT generating its own fireball in the process. It would be nice to know exactly what types and sizes of explosive charges they used when putting out oil fires in this manner.
From what I remember of my university geology course, it's usually nitroglycerine based explosives and sometimes TNT. For a smaller fire they use maybe 50-100 pounds, and for larger ones they'll use several hundred pounds.

The explosion momentarily blows out the fire, which is why they need to keep lots of fire hoses trained on the fire before, during, and after the blast to keep the well from reigniting. Without the water, the oil will just light itself again from the hot material around the wellhead.
Image
aerius: I'll vote for you if you sleep with me. :)
Lusankya: Deal!
Say, do you want it to be a threesome with your wife? Or a foursome with your wife and sister-in-law? I'm up for either. :P
User avatar
Darth Wong
Sith Lord
Sith Lord
Posts: 70028
Joined: 2002-07-03 12:25am
Location: Toronto, Canada
Contact:

Post by Darth Wong »

Nitroglycerine, interestingly enough, does not require oxygen. The nitroglycerine molecule already contains enough oxygen to oxidize itself completely (to be more precise, it contains 3.52% more oxygenthan it needs to split into various reaction products which are all fully oxidized). This is probably part of the reason why the stuff is so unstable in its unaltered form.
Image
"It's not evil for God to do it. Or for someone to do it at God's command."- Jonathan Boyd on baby-killing

"you guys are fascinated with the use of those "rules of logic" to the extent that you don't really want to discussus anything."- GC

"I do not believe Russian Roulette is a stupid act" - Embracer of Darkness

"Viagra commercials appear to save lives" - tharkûn on US health care.

http://www.stardestroyer.net/Mike/RantMode/Blurbs.html
User avatar
Admiral Valdemar
Outside Context Problem
Posts: 31572
Joined: 2002-07-04 07:17pm
Location: UK

Post by Admiral Valdemar »

It's more to do with the arrangement of the trinitrate bonding within the molecule and how easy it is for that bond to break and cause a chain reaction (if you're lucky, deflagration. Unluckily, it's usually detonation, especially if you've not made some crappy homemade NG with dinitrate bonds instead). You can cool or mix the stuff with substrates, which is of course, how we got TNT. But I'd rather go with plastique because of the more stable compounds formed in incredibly stable polymers, given nitrogen really wants to get back to its stable state, which means boom. All explosives are unstable, but nitro and old dynamite that's got a bit sweaty from age/heat are ones to avoid.
User avatar
Faram
Bastard Operator from Hell
Posts: 5271
Joined: 2002-07-04 07:39am
Location: Fighting Polarbears

Post by Faram »

TNT and other explosives is great stuff to start fire with, they burn hot and ignite easely.

But to put out a fire? Not likly unless you blow away all burnable stuff.

Happen to know this because a stick of Plastique was our favorite way to start a fire in the army, much safer end easier to handle than kreosone or disel.

And only a fool tries to use gasoline.
[img=right]http://hem.bredband.net/b217293/warsaban.gif[/img]

"Either God wants to abolish evil, and cannot; or he can, but does not want to. ... If he wants to, but cannot, he is impotent. If he can, but does not want to, he is wicked. ... If, as they say, God can abolish evil, and God really wants to do it, why is there evil in the world?" -Epicurus


Fear is the mother of all gods.

Nature does all things spontaneously, by herself, without the meddling of the gods. -Lucretius
User avatar
Winston Blake
Sith Devotee
Posts: 2529
Joined: 2004-03-26 01:58am
Location: Australia

Post by Winston Blake »

Shroom Man 777 wrote:How about an HE grenade? Or do these only exist in counterstrike...?
Given that the U.S. is already making 40mm thermobaric grenades, and that process is designed specifically to produce as much overpressure as possible, may6be some kind of thermobaric hand grenade could put a fire out? There's also the fact that they burn as much atmospheric oxygen as possible. However, the intense heat would probably mean that even if it worked, the fire would reignite soon.
Robert Gilruth to Max Faget on the Apollo program: “Max, we’re going to go back there one day, and when we do, they’re going to find out how tough it is.”
User avatar
AMX
Jedi Knight
Posts: 853
Joined: 2004-09-30 06:43am

Post by AMX »

Admiral Valdemar wrote:You can cool or mix the stuff with substrates, which is of course, how we got TNT.
Actually, that's how we got Dynamite, not TNT.

Also "trinitrate bonds" and "dinitrate bonds"?
You may want to brush up on your chemistry a bit...
User avatar
Shroom Man 777
FUCKING DICK-STABBER!
Posts: 21222
Joined: 2003-05-11 08:39am
Location: Bleeding breasts and stabbing dicks since 2003
Contact:

Re: Fire vs. Handgrenade

Post by Shroom Man 777 »

Sea Skimmer wrote:A hand grenade is a pretty substantial explosion at close range, especially if it was a concussion grenade, which has eight times more then the average of about 1oz of explosive in fragmentation grenades. Fire would be blown out a very short distance away, but then it might just reignite from the latent heat and any remaining flame would quickly spread the fire back. Grenades are something to start fires with, using one to put out a fight is not something I’d ever consider. When you use explosives to blow of things like oil fires, its very important that the blast be in the AIR above the fire, throwing a grenade doesn’t give you that.
How fast would the fire reignite? And what would a thermobaric grenade do to a fire?
Image "DO YOU WORSHIP HOMOSEXUALS?" - Curtis Saxton (source)
shroom is a lovely boy and i wont hear a bad word against him - LUSY-CHAN!
Shit! Man, I didn't think of that! It took Shroom to properly interpret the screams of dying people :D - PeZook
Shroom, I read out the stuff you write about us. You are an endless supply of morale down here. :p - an OWS street medic
Pink Sugar Heart Attack!
User avatar
Admiral Valdemar
Outside Context Problem
Posts: 31572
Joined: 2002-07-04 07:17pm
Location: UK

Post by Admiral Valdemar »

AMX wrote:Actually, that's how we got Dynamite, not TNT.
One of the two, guess I should correct one newsgroup poster on that too.
Also "trinitrate bonds" and "dinitrate bonds"?
You may want to brush up on your chemistry a bit...
Not actual bonds, obviously, as they don't exist. I meant as in the way the molecules are arranged to form that compound with the oxygen. The interaction between an unstable nitrate along with the oxygen only makes for more volatile an explosive, I suppose a better term would be pairing and talking about the valency, rather than say bonding, hmm, does reread odd after a night's sleep. The cooling or inclusion of a substrate makes such energy levels less likely to be returned to a stable valency state resulting in a bang.
Post Reply