Captain Janeway And Her Fate Worse Than Death
Moderator: Alyrium Denryle
Captain Janeway And Her Fate Worse Than Death
Okay, guys, I need some male input on a matter of Trek morality that's been bugging me for ages...
Captain Kathryn Janeway. Used to love the character. Even if you hated her from Day 1, I think you'd have to admit that she was MEANT to be the ideal Star Fleet captain in many respects. Smart. Authoritative. Brave. The whole works. And cares DEEPLY for the people under her command and would take a phaser bolt to the head for any one of them, or so I always believed.
Then along comes Q. Takes a shine to her. Wants to even kanoodle with her. Just the one time, heck, he'd even snap his fingers and whisk the lot of them back to their boring old home quadrant if only Kathryn would open her heart (and her legs) and say yes. Of course, instead, she says no...
My 'bug' aspect is this: If I were a crewman aboard the Voyager at that moment and afterwards found out that MY captain, the woman that is supposedly willing to DIE FOR ME, robbed me of a chance to go instantly home because she refused to have sex with a perfectly normal-looking humanoid male just once, do I have a right to be absolutely, bloody FURIOUS with her? Deem her an uncaring, incompetent, priggish excuse of a leader with her morals stuck in the 18th Century, even?
I would!
Also, am I the only person that was kind of grossed out by the whole bit with Janeway falling for that holo guy and the whole damn bridge crew and co. being in on it and offering their simpering approval? Aren't holo-people really just the future's version of a blow-up doll in the sexual fantasy sense? Imagine the wardroom gang aboard a naval carrier buying the ship's captain a super-deluxe plastic babe, complete with accessories and a full line of undergarments...and then being privy to his falling in love with it...YUCK!
Captain Kathryn Janeway. Used to love the character. Even if you hated her from Day 1, I think you'd have to admit that she was MEANT to be the ideal Star Fleet captain in many respects. Smart. Authoritative. Brave. The whole works. And cares DEEPLY for the people under her command and would take a phaser bolt to the head for any one of them, or so I always believed.
Then along comes Q. Takes a shine to her. Wants to even kanoodle with her. Just the one time, heck, he'd even snap his fingers and whisk the lot of them back to their boring old home quadrant if only Kathryn would open her heart (and her legs) and say yes. Of course, instead, she says no...
My 'bug' aspect is this: If I were a crewman aboard the Voyager at that moment and afterwards found out that MY captain, the woman that is supposedly willing to DIE FOR ME, robbed me of a chance to go instantly home because she refused to have sex with a perfectly normal-looking humanoid male just once, do I have a right to be absolutely, bloody FURIOUS with her? Deem her an uncaring, incompetent, priggish excuse of a leader with her morals stuck in the 18th Century, even?
I would!
Also, am I the only person that was kind of grossed out by the whole bit with Janeway falling for that holo guy and the whole damn bridge crew and co. being in on it and offering their simpering approval? Aren't holo-people really just the future's version of a blow-up doll in the sexual fantasy sense? Imagine the wardroom gang aboard a naval carrier buying the ship's captain a super-deluxe plastic babe, complete with accessories and a full line of undergarments...and then being privy to his falling in love with it...YUCK!
- SyntaxVorlon
- Sith Acolyte
- Posts: 5954
- Joined: 2002-12-18 08:45pm
- Location: Places
- Contact:
Every episode is meant to be completely literary, and it's bad literature.
It's just the ST assumption that technology may have changed, but human morals, values, and ideals, have not. Another example is the rampant sexism of female characters in TOS, though subtler and not omnipresent it still exists, and gives the impression that sexual dynamics have not changed in 300 years.
It's just the ST assumption that technology may have changed, but human morals, values, and ideals, have not. Another example is the rampant sexism of female characters in TOS, though subtler and not omnipresent it still exists, and gives the impression that sexual dynamics have not changed in 300 years.
- Darth Wong
- Sith Lord
- Posts: 70028
- Joined: 2002-07-03 12:25am
- Location: Toronto, Canada
- Contact:
Voyager's basic societal mores are those of left-wing liberal Californians. In other words, the writers concocted the society that they would create if they were in charge.
"It's not evil for God to do it. Or for someone to do it at God's command."- Jonathan Boyd on baby-killing
"you guys are fascinated with the use of those "rules of logic" to the extent that you don't really want to discussus anything."- GC
"I do not believe Russian Roulette is a stupid act" - Embracer of Darkness
"Viagra commercials appear to save lives" - tharkûn on US health care.
http://www.stardestroyer.net/Mike/RantMode/Blurbs.html
"you guys are fascinated with the use of those "rules of logic" to the extent that you don't really want to discussus anything."- GC
"I do not believe Russian Roulette is a stupid act" - Embracer of Darkness
"Viagra commercials appear to save lives" - tharkûn on US health care.
http://www.stardestroyer.net/Mike/RantMode/Blurbs.html
- Peregrin Toker
- Emperor's Hand
- Posts: 8609
- Joined: 2002-07-04 10:57am
- Location: Denmark
- Contact:
That's very widespread in all sci-fi, not just Star Trek. A good example is sci-fi from the 1950s, where people supposedly living in the 21st century still have 1950s hairstyles and mannerisms!!SyntaxVorlon wrote:It's just the ST assumption that technology may have changed, but human morals, values, and ideals, have not.
The only sci-fi I've yet encountered which explains this in a feasible way is Warhammer 40K, where humanity has regressed to a state of feudalism and absolutist monarchy, and this is explained by some sort of "age of strife" which threw humanity back to barbarism, only to be united by a tyrant known only as "The Emperor."
(obviously modelled upon the Dark Ages after the Roman Empire's collapse, and the Emperor modelled upon Charlemagne)
Darth Wong,
That's quite typical. Sci-fi often reflects the writers' political viewpoints.In other words, the writers concocted the society that they would create if they were in charge.
"Hi there, would you like to have a cookie?"
"No, actually I would HATE to have a cookie, you vapid waste of inedible flesh!"
"No, actually I would HATE to have a cookie, you vapid waste of inedible flesh!"
- Nova Andromeda
- Jedi Master
- Posts: 1404
- Joined: 2002-07-03 03:38am
- Location: Boston, Ma., U.S.A.
--Yeah, it is too bad that the left wing has been hijacked by idiots and zealots. Someone should invent a rational wing....Darth Wong wrote:Voyager's basic societal mores are those of left-wing liberal Californians. In other words, the writers concocted the society that they would create if they were in charge.
Nova Andromeda
- Falcon
- Fundamentalist Moron
- Posts: 399
- Joined: 2002-07-03 09:21pm
- Location: United States of America
As with most series, Star Trek: Voyager could have ended on its first episode with just a little more thought and a lot less stupidity. That wouldn't make for a very interesting show though, now would it. Instead they toss in these 'almost got home' scenarios which are foiled at the last minute by some (usually lame) incident.
This is why StarGate rocks, it manages to do sci-fi right (IMHO), even the time travel ep (1967, 2010) were well done.
This is why StarGate rocks, it manages to do sci-fi right (IMHO), even the time travel ep (1967, 2010) were well done.
-
- Fucking Awesome
- Posts: 13834
- Joined: 2002-07-04 03:21pm
I am not a direction! I AM A FREE MAN!Someone should invent a rational wing....
The End of Suburbia
"If more cars are inevitable, must there not be roads for them to run on?"
-Robert Moses
"The Wire" is the best show in the history of television. Watch it today.
"If more cars are inevitable, must there not be roads for them to run on?"
-Robert Moses
"The Wire" is the best show in the history of television. Watch it today.
Captain Janeway And Her Fate Worse Than Death
Even the worst puritans have always understood the concept of 'doing it' for Queen and country. Hey, Janeway! You could've closed your eyes and accommodated Q for Star Fleet and the Federation, if not for your hapless dregs below decks. And IMO it's not like Q needed a bag put over his head either (unlike you-know-who in B5).
Trek's version of sexual mores is what I think of as tee-hee sex...just a very immature attitude overall. Even silly old SPACE: 1999 handled the subject better--didn't the commander in that one have an ongoing relationship with the doctor? It was never a big deal, it was just a note of realism amidst a bunch of whackiness. VOY would rather hook up its captain with a fake fantasy character than a perfectly nice, available and interested living person in the form of Chakotay, geez...
I wonder if our hypothetical crewman, the one that I think would be justified in being pissed off with Janeway, could get out of Star Fleet once back in Federation space and launch a civil suit against her, charging that she failed in her duty to take advantage of an opportunity to get them home and thus caused much unnecessary stress and suffering...
Trek's version of sexual mores is what I think of as tee-hee sex...just a very immature attitude overall. Even silly old SPACE: 1999 handled the subject better--didn't the commander in that one have an ongoing relationship with the doctor? It was never a big deal, it was just a note of realism amidst a bunch of whackiness. VOY would rather hook up its captain with a fake fantasy character than a perfectly nice, available and interested living person in the form of Chakotay, geez...
I wonder if our hypothetical crewman, the one that I think would be justified in being pissed off with Janeway, could get out of Star Fleet once back in Federation space and launch a civil suit against her, charging that she failed in her duty to take advantage of an opportunity to get them home and thus caused much unnecessary stress and suffering...
- Darth Wong
- Sith Lord
- Posts: 70028
- Joined: 2002-07-03 12:25am
- Location: Toronto, Canada
- Contact:
I think that most women, in that situation, would give it up to Q. The stakes are way too high to be that selfish. Then again, I still don't understand why Q would pick her out of the entire crew.
"It's not evil for God to do it. Or for someone to do it at God's command."- Jonathan Boyd on baby-killing
"you guys are fascinated with the use of those "rules of logic" to the extent that you don't really want to discussus anything."- GC
"I do not believe Russian Roulette is a stupid act" - Embracer of Darkness
"Viagra commercials appear to save lives" - tharkûn on US health care.
http://www.stardestroyer.net/Mike/RantMode/Blurbs.html
"you guys are fascinated with the use of those "rules of logic" to the extent that you don't really want to discussus anything."- GC
"I do not believe Russian Roulette is a stupid act" - Embracer of Darkness
"Viagra commercials appear to save lives" - tharkûn on US health care.
http://www.stardestroyer.net/Mike/RantMode/Blurbs.html
- Enlightenment
- Moderator Emeritus
- Posts: 2404
- Joined: 2002-07-04 07:38pm
- Location: Annoying nationalist twits since 1990
It would depend on the individual, IMO. A golddigger wouldn't hesitate to get screwed by the apex sentient in the Trek universe. Someone with decent self-esteem would think about it for a good long while; accepting would be very much a matter of 'taking one for the team' than anything else.Darth Wong wrote:I think that most women, in that situation, would give it up to Q.
It's one of those unanswerable mysteries of Star Trek, alongside why hostile foliage always seeks out redshirts and why the warp core ejectors never work.Then again, I still don't understand why Q would pick her out of the entire crew.
Besides, the differences between the Q and Trek humans are so great that intra-species differences among Trek humans are pretty much lost in the noise.
It's not my place in life to make people happy. Don't talk to me unless you're prepared to watch me slaughter cows you hold sacred. Don't talk to me unless you're prepared to have your basic assumptions challenged. If you want bunnies in light, talk to someone else.
- Keevan_Colton
- Emperor's Hand
- Posts: 10355
- Joined: 2002-12-30 08:57pm
- Location: In the Land of Logic and Reason, two doors down from Lilliput and across the road from Atlantis...
- Contact:
- Peregrin Toker
- Emperor's Hand
- Posts: 8609
- Joined: 2002-07-04 10:57am
- Location: Denmark
- Contact:
That was BEFORE 7 of 9 arrived on the ship.Darth Wong wrote:Then again, I still don't understand why Q would pick her out of the entire crew.
Let's look at the other women aboard the bridge:
Lt. Torres: It's a long time ago I last watched Voyager, but if I rember correctly, Torres was quite psychotic and unpredictable. Besides, she already had a crush on Tom Paris, so why bother??
Kes: Already involved with Neelix.
Of course, Q could have chosen a hitherto-unknown lieutenant, ensign or petty officer, but that wouldn't be in the interest of the writers.
"Hi there, would you like to have a cookie?"
"No, actually I would HATE to have a cookie, you vapid waste of inedible flesh!"
"No, actually I would HATE to have a cookie, you vapid waste of inedible flesh!"
- His Divine Shadow
- Commence Primary Ignition
- Posts: 12791
- Joined: 2002-07-03 07:22am
- Location: Finland, west coast
- Keevan_Colton
- Emperor's Hand
- Posts: 10355
- Joined: 2002-12-30 08:57pm
- Location: In the Land of Logic and Reason, two doors down from Lilliput and across the road from Atlantis...
- Contact:
- His Divine Shadow
- Commence Primary Ignition
- Posts: 12791
- Joined: 2002-07-03 07:22am
- Location: Finland, west coast
- Keevan_Colton
- Emperor's Hand
- Posts: 10355
- Joined: 2002-12-30 08:57pm
- Location: In the Land of Logic and Reason, two doors down from Lilliput and across the road from Atlantis...
- Contact:
You must admit he does look like he'll take anything he can get....from anyone that he can get....hell...he might even do janeway.....His Divine Shadow wrote:Neelix didn't have any problems with thatKeevan_Colton wrote:Plus maybe Q didnt want branded a pedophile for screwing someone that was only 2?
Infact...ever wondered how he ended up with that job of his???
- Singular Quartet
- Sith Marauder
- Posts: 3896
- Joined: 2002-07-04 05:33pm
- Location: This is sky. It is made of FUCKING and LIMIT.
Stop now. I don't need more horrible images of Janeway.Keevan_Colton wrote:You must admit he does look like he'll take anything he can get....from anyone that he can get....hell...he might even do janeway.....His Divine Shadow wrote:Neelix didn't have any problems with thatKeevan_Colton wrote:Plus maybe Q didnt want branded a pedophile for screwing someone that was only 2?
Infact...ever wondered how he ended up with that job of his???
- Coyote
- Rabid Monkey
- Posts: 12464
- Joined: 2002-08-23 01:20am
- Location: The glorious Sun-Barge! Isis, Isis, Ra,Ra,Ra!
- Contact:
One romp in the sack and its home free? Janeway shoulda spread 'em-- one for the crew and all the families who want Joe Ensign to come home.
But still had I been Q, I'd've gone after Torres. Even if she starts throwing plates or something I can just deflect everything anyway. She'd be much more energetic and interesting. Janeway's too tight-assed. Maybe Q needs to give her ANAL SEX!
How's that for an image?
B5 and Farscape handle sex well, I think.
But still had I been Q, I'd've gone after Torres. Even if she starts throwing plates or something I can just deflect everything anyway. She'd be much more energetic and interesting. Janeway's too tight-assed. Maybe Q needs to give her ANAL SEX!
How's that for an image?
B5 and Farscape handle sex well, I think.
Something about Libertarianism always bothered me. Then one day, I realized what it was:
Libertarian philosophy can be boiled down to the phrase, "Work Will Make You Free."
In Libertarianism, there is no Government, so the Bosses are free to exploit the Workers.
In Communism, there is no Government, so the Workers are free to exploit the Bosses.
So in Libertarianism, man exploits man, but in Communism, its the other way around!
If all you want to do is have some harmless, mindless fun, go H3RE INST3ADZ0RZ!!
Grrr! Fight my Brute, you pansy!
Libertarian philosophy can be boiled down to the phrase, "Work Will Make You Free."
In Libertarianism, there is no Government, so the Bosses are free to exploit the Workers.
In Communism, there is no Government, so the Workers are free to exploit the Bosses.
So in Libertarianism, man exploits man, but in Communism, its the other way around!
If all you want to do is have some harmless, mindless fun, go H3RE INST3ADZ0RZ!!
Grrr! Fight my Brute, you pansy!
- Keevan_Colton
- Emperor's Hand
- Posts: 10355
- Joined: 2002-12-30 08:57pm
- Location: In the Land of Logic and Reason, two doors down from Lilliput and across the road from Atlantis...
- Contact: