DNA Testing on 2,000-Year-Old Bones in Italy Reveal East Asi

[ray245]

Researchers excavating an ancient Roman cemetery made a surprising discovery when they extracted ancient mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) from one of the skeletons buried at the site: the 2,000-year-old bones revealed a maternal East Asian ancestry.

The results will be presented at the Roman Archeology Conference at Oxford, England, in March, and published in the Journal of Roman Archaeology.

According to Tracy Prowse, assistant professor of Anthropology, and the lead author on the study, the isotopic evidence indicates that about 20% of the sample analyzed to-date was not born in the area around Vagnari. The mtDNA is another line of evidence that indicates at least one individual was of East Asian descent.

"These preliminary isotopic and mtDNA data provide tantalizing evidence that some of the people who lived and died at Vagnari were foreigners, and that they may have come to Vagnari from beyond the borders of the Roman Empire," says Prowse. "This research addresses broader issues relating to globalization, human mobility, identity, and diversity in Roman Italy."

Based on her work in the region, she thinks the East Asian man, who lived sometime between the first to second centuries AD -- the early Roman Empire -- was a slave or worker on the site. His surviving grave goods consist of a single pot (which archaeologists used to date the burial). What's more, his burial was disturbed in antiquity and someone was buried on top of him.

Prowse's team cannot say how recently he, or his ancestors, left East Asia: he could have made the journey alone, or his East Asian genes might have come from a distant maternal ancestor. However, the oxygen isotope evidence indicates that he was definitely not born in Italy and likely came here from elsewhere in the Roman Empire.

During this era, Vagnari was an Imperial estate owned by the emperor in Rome and controlled by a local administrator. Workers were employed in industrial activities on the site, including iron smelting and tile production. These tiles were used for roofing buildings on the site and were also used as grave covers for the people buried in the cemetery. Fragmentary tiles found in and around Vagnari are marked "Gratus Caesaris," which translates into "slave of the emperor."

In addition to the mystery the find uncovers, Prowse sees the broader scientific impact for archaeologists, physical anthropologists, and classicists: The grave goods from this individual's burial gave no indication that he was foreign-born or of East Asian descent.

"This multi-faceted research demonstrates that human skeletal remains can provide another layer of evidence in conjunction with archaeological and historical information," says Prowse.

For the last seven years, Prowse has been digging the cemetery at the site of Vagnari, just west of the city of Bari in southern Italy. The cemetery was first discovered in 2002 by her colleague, Alastair Small (University of Edinburgh), who directs the excavations at Vagnari and continues to excavate other areas of the site. Prowse's research focuses on the bioarchaeological analysis of the people buried in the cemetery, including isotopic, palaeopathological, and aDNA analysis. The ancient DNA analyses were conducted by her coauthors on the paper, Jodi Barta and Tanya vonHunnius, at McMaster University.

The research was funded by the Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada.

http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/20 ... 171756.htm

Very interesting find. I have to wonder if this man travelled all the way from East Asia to the Roman Empire alone, or he travelled together with a group of East Asians.

[Thanas]

We know the romans had trade missions all the way into Siam, it should not be surprising that some merchants brought back slaves as well. It is quite easy to imagine some city in arabia or the levante having an east asian "minority" and some of those being enslaved in some way.

Rome was no stranger to other ethnicities, after all they had several emperors that were definitely not of Roman stock.

[ray245]

We know the romans had trade missions all the way into Siam, it should not be surprising that some merchants brought back slaves as well. It is quite easy to imagine some city in arabia or the levante having an east asian "minority" and some of those being enslaved in some way.

Hmm, is there any books that deals with the Roman presence in South East Asia? This is a topic that I will love to learn more about.

[Big Phil]

How much direct contact was there between Rome and China-Burma-India? Did Romans actually travel all the way to China, and Chinese all the way to Rome, or did the two only vaguely know about each other and all contact was using intermediaries (central-Asian nomads, Parthians, etc.)?

[Thanas]

Roman traders travelled all the way to Siam at least and we know that there are some roman-built churches in those areas as well, though that was in the fifth and sixth century, AFAIK. But generally contact was made through intermediaries. Still, we know that some delegations travelled directly all the way to Rome, for example in the time of Marcus Aurelius.

The situation was easier once Rome smashed the Parthians and conquered the province of Arabia, thereby allowing them direct and unmolested access to India et all over the Indian Ocean and red sea.

[TC Pilot]

The situation was easier once Rome smashed the Parthians and conquered the province of Arabia, thereby allowing them direct and unmolested access to India et all over the Indian Ocean and red sea.

When did this happen?

[Thanas]

The conquest of arabia happened under Trajan and Hadrian. (Note: Roman Arabia is this), which allowed the romans to gain indirect control of the arabian peninsula.

The Parthian kingdom was smashed first under Marcus Aurelius when Avidius Cassius reached even Media and second under Septimius Severus. Neither one were complete conquests, but they took effective control of the desert trade routes, which remained the case until the sassanids.