Ancient Romans in South America?
Moderator: K. A. Pital
- Panzersharkcat
- Jedi Council Member
- Posts: 1705
- Joined: 2011-02-28 05:36am
Re: Ancient Romans in South America?
No. The Olmec were around for about a thousand years before Rome. Wikipedia has a long list of pre-Columbian civilizations. Here are the South American ones.
"I'm just reading through your formspring here, and your responses to many questions seem to indicate that you are ready and willing to sacrifice realism/believability for the sake of (sometimes) marginal increases in gameplay quality. Why is this?"
"Because until I see gamers sincerely demanding that if they get winged in the gut with a bullet that they spend the next three hours bleeding out on the ground before permanently dying, they probably are too." - J.E. Sawyer
"Because until I see gamers sincerely demanding that if they get winged in the gut with a bullet that they spend the next three hours bleeding out on the ground before permanently dying, they probably are too." - J.E. Sawyer
Re: Ancient Romans in South America?
The main reason I doubt any such contact arrived alive is because Roman ships only carried fresh water and foodstuffs for a few days due to the relatively short travel distance in the mediterranean. The ship also would most likely not have carried grain given that those trade routes ran through Gaul or from Britain to the Rhine.
Whoever says "education does not matter" can try ignorance
------------
A decision must be made in the life of every nation at the very moment when the grasp of the enemy is at its throat. Then, it seems that the only way to survive is to use the means of the enemy, to rest survival upon what is expedient, to look the other way. Well, the answer to that is 'survival as what'? A country isn't a rock. It's not an extension of one's self. It's what it stands for. It's what it stands for when standing for something is the most difficult! - Chief Judge Haywood
------------
My LPs
------------
A decision must be made in the life of every nation at the very moment when the grasp of the enemy is at its throat. Then, it seems that the only way to survive is to use the means of the enemy, to rest survival upon what is expedient, to look the other way. Well, the answer to that is 'survival as what'? A country isn't a rock. It's not an extension of one's self. It's what it stands for. It's what it stands for when standing for something is the most difficult! - Chief Judge Haywood
------------
My LPs
- Sea Skimmer
- Yankee Capitalist Air Pirate
- Posts: 37390
- Joined: 2002-07-03 11:49pm
- Location: Passchendaele City, HAB
Re: Ancient Romans in South America?
It takes ~3 weeks to starve to death and you can get freshwater from rainfall and fish from the ocean. Lack of supplies on its own is not a plausible reason for contact to be impossible. Doubtful, maybe, but the main reason I doubt the claims in the original article is because it specified a pair of ships. One ship would be vastly more likely since the Romans seem to have had no possible reason for convoys in the Atlantic.
"This cult of special forces is as sensible as to form a Royal Corps of Tree Climbers and say that no soldier who does not wear its green hat with a bunch of oak leaves stuck in it should be expected to climb a tree"
— Field Marshal William Slim 1956
— Field Marshal William Slim 1956
-
- Emperor's Hand
- Posts: 30165
- Joined: 2009-05-23 07:29pm
Re: Ancient Romans in South America?
Individuals have survived for weeks or months at sea in small boats- like Skimmer says, rainwater and fish. A larger crew might have more trouble; then again they might luck out on rainfall and would probably have more and better vessels to store rainwater in.
This space dedicated to Vasily Arkhipov
Re: Ancient Romans in South America?
How long do you think it takes for a ship that took several weeks to go from Rome to Alexandria in optimal conditions to drift all the way across the ocean?Sea Skimmer wrote:It takes ~3 weeks to starve to death and you can get freshwater from rainfall and fish from the ocean. Lack of supplies on its own is not a plausible reason for contact to be impossible.
They might however have travelled in pairs from the start and gotten blown out. That a ship which travelled near the shoreline of the spanish coast however could have been blown out to the Atlantic is what is pretty hard to believe for me.Doubtful, maybe, but the main reason I doubt the claims in the original article is because it specified a pair of ships. One ship would be vastly more likely since the Romans seem to have had no possible reason for convoys in the Atlantic.
Whoever says "education does not matter" can try ignorance
------------
A decision must be made in the life of every nation at the very moment when the grasp of the enemy is at its throat. Then, it seems that the only way to survive is to use the means of the enemy, to rest survival upon what is expedient, to look the other way. Well, the answer to that is 'survival as what'? A country isn't a rock. It's not an extension of one's self. It's what it stands for. It's what it stands for when standing for something is the most difficult! - Chief Judge Haywood
------------
My LPs
------------
A decision must be made in the life of every nation at the very moment when the grasp of the enemy is at its throat. Then, it seems that the only way to survive is to use the means of the enemy, to rest survival upon what is expedient, to look the other way. Well, the answer to that is 'survival as what'? A country isn't a rock. It's not an extension of one's self. It's what it stands for. It's what it stands for when standing for something is the most difficult! - Chief Judge Haywood
------------
My LPs
- Sea Skimmer
- Yankee Capitalist Air Pirate
- Posts: 37390
- Joined: 2002-07-03 11:49pm
- Location: Passchendaele City, HAB
Re: Ancient Romans in South America?
The wind is never optimal for that trip given that land blocks the direct route; it is often optimal for a direct path from West Africa to Brazil. Furthermore why should we assume that every ship in the Atlantic and possibly making a voyage to the Canaries or Azores would be supplied no better then one cruising in the Mediterranean? That’s just irrational. You meanwhile seem to just completely be ignoring the fact that you can get supplies from the sea and rain and greatly extend your survival time, potentially indefinitely and certainly for a matter of days or weeks unless you are unlucky. One group of men in an open life boat from Roger B Taney[/ii] torpedoed and sunk in the Atlantic survived over a month and traveled around 2600 miles before being rescued with almost no supplies or equipment.Thanas wrote: How long do you think it takes for a ship that took several weeks to go from Rome to Alexandria in optimal conditions to drift all the way across the ocean?
They might however have travelled in pairs from the start and gotten blown out. That a ship which travelled near the shoreline of the spanish coast however could have been blown out to the Atlantic is what is pretty hard to believe for me.
Why? The prevailing wind blows south and then out to sea. The ocean current in that region also flows south… and out to sea.
http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/c ... c_Gyre.png
http://www.humanities.uci.edu/mclark/Hu ... umbus7.jpg
These currents and winds are a major factor in the later buildup of the Portuguese Empire in NE Brazil. The hardest part of the voyage would be the last ~500 miles because at that point the current and wind is more likely to shift to the west than south west because it doesn’t want to cross the equator. Anyone who got that far though, isn’t going home easily. Its more then a little interesting BTW that you argue that the ships steer poorly and aren't very seaworthy, and then question that they'd ever pulled out of control into the open ocean. Seems like one big contradiction to me.
"This cult of special forces is as sensible as to form a Royal Corps of Tree Climbers and say that no soldier who does not wear its green hat with a bunch of oak leaves stuck in it should be expected to climb a tree"
— Field Marshal William Slim 1956
— Field Marshal William Slim 1956