What exactly are the volumes of MBTs and what are they taken up by?
Kind of curious of why the Leopard 2 is roughly 40% higher then the Abrams, at least according to wikipedia.
Modern Main Battle Tank Volumes
Moderator: K. A. Pital
Modern Main Battle Tank Volumes
Suffering from the diminishing marginal utility of wealth.
Re: Modern Main Battle Tank Volumes
http://www.inetres.com/gp/military/cv/tank/M1.html
A ridiculous pile of armor, a huge engine to push the ridiculous pile of armor around, a cannon, ammunition for that cannon, and a few guys wedged in in some spare cracks, ostensibly to drive the thing (more likely to provide biodegradable padding for the moving parts). There's a cutaway picture at the link.
A ridiculous pile of armor, a huge engine to push the ridiculous pile of armor around, a cannon, ammunition for that cannon, and a few guys wedged in in some spare cracks, ostensibly to drive the thing (more likely to provide biodegradable padding for the moving parts). There's a cutaway picture at the link.
- Sea Skimmer
- Yankee Capitalist Air Pirate
- Posts: 37390
- Joined: 2002-07-03 11:49pm
- Location: Passchendaele City, HAB
Re: Modern Main Battle Tank Volumes
Wikipedia is quoting incompatible height measurements, or just wrong as usual then, I have no interest in figuring out which. The key height measurement to the top of the turret roof is near identical for these two vehicles, the Leopard II is only about four inches taller, which is probably linked into the large amount of ammunition stowed in the hull and that the M1 hull is maybe a foot longer. If you count all the equipment on the turret roof other then radio whips the M1 is a bit taller.
"This cult of special forces is as sensible as to form a Royal Corps of Tree Climbers and say that no soldier who does not wear its green hat with a bunch of oak leaves stuck in it should be expected to climb a tree"
— Field Marshal William Slim 1956
— Field Marshal William Slim 1956