[Member] Stark removal vote comments

[Dalton]

Ah, so blatant procedural misuse can be instantly healed as long as the members are in agreement. Good to know.

I find it odd that nobody has yet commented on this. I thought we had already resolved this violation of procedure as a miscommunication between Mike and Bean/Wilkens, as Mike himself has said. That being the case, are you still looking for some sort of ramifications or punishments for them?

[Keevan_Colton]

Ah, so blatant procedural misuse can be instantly healed as long as the members are in agreement. Good to know.

I find it odd that nobody has yet commented on this. I thought we had already resolved this violation of procedure as a miscommunication between Mike and Bean/Wilkens, as Mike himself has said. That being the case, are you still looking for some sort of ramifications or punishments for them?

I think it's the fact that there's apparently a need to vote to void it that he's commenting on.

Since it's been admitted to be out of line with procedure it should be void automatically, rather than a topic of a vote.

[Dalton]

Ah, so blatant procedural misuse can be instantly healed as long as the members are in agreement. Good to know.

I find it odd that nobody has yet commented on this. I thought we had already resolved this violation of procedure as a miscommunication between Mike and Bean/Wilkens, as Mike himself has said. That being the case, are you still looking for some sort of ramifications or punishments for them?

I think it's the fact that there's apparently a need to vote to void it that he's commenting on.

Since it's been admitted to be out of line with procedure it should be void automatically, rather than a topic of a vote.

That is not the impression that I got from his post, since contextually it doesn't mesh. Rather than guess at what he meant, though, we should let him answer.

[Thanas]

Answered in this thread.