[VOTE] Removing a member

[CmdrWilkens]

A complaint has been brought against Stark under rule 2.C.II.a

Per threads here
http://bbs.stardestroyer.net/viewtopic. ... 2#p3185402

Is anyone going to step forward and take responsibility, or do we just stick with the current 'Senate totally useless, mods do what they want without transparency'? Because if the standard is 'Bean thinks it's good enough', I want nothing more to do with this sham Senate.

And here
http://bbs.stardestroyer.net/viewtopic. ... 0#p3185420

Are you admitting you just decided to do this? I have no interest in playing shadowboxing with you on unspoken rules. If Mike wants to tool around with the board that's fine, but if the Senate is about discussion until you decide it's not, I don't want to be a Senator anymore.

And what's this 'the forum' business? I just clearly stated that if this is the situation (ie you set invisible standards and decide when discussion is worthless) I don't want to be a Senator. Are you trying to bait me into getting banned? How fascinating.

Stark no longer wishes to be part of the Senate. A motion has been made and seconded that he be removed from the Senate. His access has been suspended pending the outcome of this vote. A separate comment thread will be opened so for once I AM going to enforce the no chatter rule. This includes "Voted" posts. If you have comments please go here.

[CmdrWilkens]

I am serious, don't post in this thread, use the provided comment thread.

((Vote Topic Locked until Procedural Questions have been addressed -- Lady T)