[Discussion] Voting majorities
Moderator: CmdrWilkens
If all Senators and all mods were to vote, minus DW and Rob Wilson, we'd have 24 more votes to go. That's enough to tip the balance, so let's leave it be for a while yet.
Edi
Edi
Warwolf Urban Combat Specialist
Why is it so goddamned hard to get little assholes like you to admit it when you fuck up? Is it pride? What gives you the right to have any pride?
–Darth Wong to vivftp
GOP message? Why don't they just come out of the closet: FASCISTS R' US –Patrick Degan
The GOP has a problem with anyone coming out of the closet. –18-till-I-die
Why is it so goddamned hard to get little assholes like you to admit it when you fuck up? Is it pride? What gives you the right to have any pride?
–Darth Wong to vivftp
GOP message? Why don't they just come out of the closet: FASCISTS R' US –Patrick Degan
The GOP has a problem with anyone coming out of the closet. –18-till-I-die
- GrandMasterTerwynn
- Emperor's Hand
- Posts: 6787
- Joined: 2002-07-29 06:14pm
- Location: Somewhere on Earth.
Not really. 61% is a definite majority and is a super-majority, if one makes a super-majority over 60% And the poll has been up for almost a week now. I suspect that most everybody who wanted to vote on this matter has already done so. So I'm all for forwarding this matter to the next available and willing admin to do their thing with it.CmdrWilkens wrote:Honestly that probably makes this the first truly contested ban poll we've done since the implementaiton of the senate structure.
<ADDENDUM>
This might make an interesting point of discussion. Since banning by the Senate probably isn't something that ought to be done likely, should we establish some sort of hard and fast guideline on what percentage of voters must vote for a ban for that ban to recieve our official blessing?
Tales of the Known Worlds:
2070s - The Seventy-Niners ... 3500s - Fair as Death ... 4900s - Against Improbable Odds V 1.0
2070s - The Seventy-Niners ... 3500s - Fair as Death ... 4900s - Against Improbable Odds V 1.0
- RedImperator
- Roosevelt Republican
- Posts: 16465
- Joined: 2002-07-11 07:59pm
- Location: Delaware
- Contact:
It seems like we've definitely got a ban here. I'd take care of it myself, but for some reason my promotion hasn't gone through yet.
Any city gets what it admires, will pay for, and, ultimately, deserves…We want and deserve tin-can architecture in a tinhorn culture. And we will probably be judged not by the monuments we build but by those we have destroyed.--Ada Louise Huxtable, "Farewell to Penn Station", New York Times editorial, 30 October 1963
X-Ray Blues
X-Ray Blues
I don't know....18-11 isn't even a 2/3 majority and seems like a pretty close vote to me.
"On the infrequent occasions when I have been called upon in a formal place to play the bongo drums, the introducer never seems to find it necessary to mention that I also do theoretical physics." -Richard Feynman
- Lagmonster
- Master Control Program
- Posts: 7719
- Joined: 2002-07-04 09:53am
- Location: Ottawa, Canada
Do we have a time limit on voting, beyond which senators are considered absent for the vote?Zaia wrote:I don't know....18-11 isn't even a 2/3 majority and seems like a pretty close vote to me.
At that, do we have a rule which explains how close a vote can be before it is considered even, or do we side with the winner even in a 49-51 split?
Note: I'm semi-retired from the board, so if you need something, please be patient.
- Ghost Rider
- Spirit of Vengeance
- Posts: 27779
- Joined: 2002-09-24 01:48pm
- Location: DC...looking up from the gutters to the stars
No real time limit, except what we figure to be good sense. I'd say on the level of a week, beyond which it becomes redundant.Lagmonster wrote:Do we have a time limit on voting, beyond which senators are considered absent for the vote?Zaia wrote:I don't know....18-11 isn't even a 2/3 majority and seems like a pretty close vote to me.
At that, do we have a rule which explains how close a vote can be before it is considered even, or do we side with the winner even in a 49-51 split?
As for tie-breakers, in cases of bannings I leave that to Mike should it ever happen. If he feels it's a ban, then so, if not...same deal.
As for majority...if it's 51-49, then the vote swings to the majority or voting is absolutely pointless. Saying it should be supermajority is a slippery slope because then what do we define as that number, 60%, 70%, 80%?
MM /CF/WG/BOTM/JL/Original Warsie/ACPATHNTDWATGODW FOREVER!!
Sometimes we can choose the path we follow. Sometimes our choices are made for us. And sometimes we have no choice at all
Saying and doing are chocolate and concrete
Sometimes we can choose the path we follow. Sometimes our choices are made for us. And sometimes we have no choice at all
Saying and doing are chocolate and concrete
- RedImperator
- Roosevelt Republican
- Posts: 16465
- Joined: 2002-07-11 07:59pm
- Location: Delaware
- Contact:
We've still got a supermajority, and munky isn't getting any less useless.Zaia wrote:I don't know....18-11 isn't even a 2/3 majority and seems like a pretty close vote to me.
Any city gets what it admires, will pay for, and, ultimately, deserves…We want and deserve tin-can architecture in a tinhorn culture. And we will probably be judged not by the monuments we build but by those we have destroyed.--Ada Louise Huxtable, "Farewell to Penn Station", New York Times editorial, 30 October 1963
X-Ray Blues
X-Ray Blues
Well, however we decide to define a majority, we need to do so now. I wasn't thinking that a 51-49 vote would ever decide anything, since there's nothing requiring every member to vote here.
For whatever reason, I had it in my head that we needed a definitive majority to pass motions and things, so it literally gave me a jolt when Red said it was clearly a banning. But yeah, I'm not sure why I had that in my head, but I did.
For whatever reason, I had it in my head that we needed a definitive majority to pass motions and things, so it literally gave me a jolt when Red said it was clearly a banning. But yeah, I'm not sure why I had that in my head, but I did.
"On the infrequent occasions when I have been called upon in a formal place to play the bongo drums, the introducer never seems to find it necessary to mention that I also do theoretical physics." -Richard Feynman
- Lagmonster
- Master Control Program
- Posts: 7719
- Joined: 2002-07-04 09:53am
- Location: Ottawa, Canada
Some of it has to do with how the administration handles a Senate vote, as in whether each individual Senator's vote counts in administrative decisions, or whether the Senate's role is to arrive at a decision, and then pass that on to the administration as a collective vote (to be counted alongside the vote of each admin).
Note: I'm semi-retired from the board, so if you need something, please be patient.
- Coyote
- Rabid Monkey
- Posts: 12464
- Joined: 2002-08-23 01:20am
- Location: The glorious Sun-Barge! Isis, Isis, Ra,Ra,Ra!
- Contact:
How would the categories be broken down? We typically deal with:
Removal of troll/offensive member
Titling/removing priviledges
Changing/adding a board policy or rule
Adding new Senator
Which of these would need simple majorities; which would need a supermajority?
... we take it in turn to act as a sort of executive officer for a week. But all the decisions of that officer have to be ratified by a simple majority in the case of purely internal matters, or by a 2/3 majority in the case of external affairs...
Removal of troll/offensive member
Titling/removing priviledges
Changing/adding a board policy or rule
Adding new Senator
Which of these would need simple majorities; which would need a supermajority?
... we take it in turn to act as a sort of executive officer for a week. But all the decisions of that officer have to be ratified by a simple majority in the case of purely internal matters, or by a 2/3 majority in the case of external affairs...
Something about Libertarianism always bothered me. Then one day, I realized what it was:
Libertarian philosophy can be boiled down to the phrase, "Work Will Make You Free."
In Libertarianism, there is no Government, so the Bosses are free to exploit the Workers.
In Communism, there is no Government, so the Workers are free to exploit the Bosses.
So in Libertarianism, man exploits man, but in Communism, its the other way around!
If all you want to do is have some harmless, mindless fun, go H3RE INST3ADZ0RZ!!
Grrr! Fight my Brute, you pansy!
Libertarian philosophy can be boiled down to the phrase, "Work Will Make You Free."
In Libertarianism, there is no Government, so the Bosses are free to exploit the Workers.
In Communism, there is no Government, so the Workers are free to exploit the Bosses.
So in Libertarianism, man exploits man, but in Communism, its the other way around!
If all you want to do is have some harmless, mindless fun, go H3RE INST3ADZ0RZ!!
Grrr! Fight my Brute, you pansy!
I would think that since removal of a member is a serious matter, we should require at least 60% of the votes (supermajority) to execute; meanwhile, titling or removing privileges should only require a simple majority (in the absence of a supermajority to ban); changing or adding a board policy or rule would make sense as a simple majority; and, I think adding a new Senator, since we may often deal with multiple candidates, should be a simple plurality of the vote.Coyote wrote:How would the categories be broken down? We typically deal with:
Removal of troll/offensive member
Titling/removing priviledges
Changing/adding a board policy or rule
Adding new Senator
We should also establish a quorum before we end a vote, to make sure that the vote is fairly representative of the Senate while not forcing all Senators to vote.
A Government founded upon justice, and recognizing the equal rights of all men; claiming higher authority for existence, or sanction for its laws, that nature, reason, and the regularly ascertained will of the people; steadily refusing to put its sword and purse in the service of any religious creed or family is a standing offense to most of the Governments of the world, and to some narrow and bigoted people among ourselves.
F. Douglass
- GrandMasterTerwynn
- Emperor's Hand
- Posts: 6787
- Joined: 2002-07-29 06:14pm
- Location: Somewhere on Earth.
I would say that bannings, changing/adding board policy, and adding user groups require a supermajority (I like the 60% figure myself.) But adding/removing a title and adding Senators should just require the simple majority, or the plurality you mentioned above.Surlethe wrote:I would think that since removal of a member is a serious matter, we should require at least 60% of the votes (supermajority) to execute; meanwhile, titling or removing privileges should only require a simple majority (in the absence of a supermajority to ban); changing or adding a board policy or rule would make sense as a simple majority; and, I think adding a new Senator, since we may often deal with multiple candidates, should be a simple plurality of the vote.Coyote wrote:How would the categories be broken down? We typically deal with:
Removal of troll/offensive member
Titling/removing priviledges
Changing/adding a board policy or rule
Adding new Senator
We should also establish a quorum before we end a vote, to make sure that the vote is fairly representative of the Senate while not forcing all Senators to vote.
Tales of the Known Worlds:
2070s - The Seventy-Niners ... 3500s - Fair as Death ... 4900s - Against Improbable Odds V 1.0
2070s - The Seventy-Niners ... 3500s - Fair as Death ... 4900s - Against Improbable Odds V 1.0
- RedImperator
- Roosevelt Republican
- Posts: 16465
- Joined: 2002-07-11 07:59pm
- Location: Delaware
- Contact:
I like requiring a supermajority for a ban because I don't ever want to be in a position where we have to consider unbanning someone. I can see us having a real tight vote, an administrator acts maybe a day too early, and then enough senators to tip the balance complain they didn't get a chance to vote. Then the banned member has grounds for appeal. I feel that one of the reasons this board works is because banning is a real, permanant punishment; I don't want anyone ever getting the idea you can weasel your way back in.
Any city gets what it admires, will pay for, and, ultimately, deserves…We want and deserve tin-can architecture in a tinhorn culture. And we will probably be judged not by the monuments we build but by those we have destroyed.--Ada Louise Huxtable, "Farewell to Penn Station", New York Times editorial, 30 October 1963
X-Ray Blues
X-Ray Blues
- Coyote
- Rabid Monkey
- Posts: 12464
- Joined: 2002-08-23 01:20am
- Location: The glorious Sun-Barge! Isis, Isis, Ra,Ra,Ra!
- Contact:
If we vote to ban a member, but don't have a supermajority, do we automatically default to a title and loss of sig/av priviledges without need to vote?
Something about Libertarianism always bothered me. Then one day, I realized what it was:
Libertarian philosophy can be boiled down to the phrase, "Work Will Make You Free."
In Libertarianism, there is no Government, so the Bosses are free to exploit the Workers.
In Communism, there is no Government, so the Workers are free to exploit the Bosses.
So in Libertarianism, man exploits man, but in Communism, its the other way around!
If all you want to do is have some harmless, mindless fun, go H3RE INST3ADZ0RZ!!
Grrr! Fight my Brute, you pansy!
Libertarian philosophy can be boiled down to the phrase, "Work Will Make You Free."
In Libertarianism, there is no Government, so the Bosses are free to exploit the Workers.
In Communism, there is no Government, so the Workers are free to exploit the Bosses.
So in Libertarianism, man exploits man, but in Communism, its the other way around!
If all you want to do is have some harmless, mindless fun, go H3RE INST3ADZ0RZ!!
Grrr! Fight my Brute, you pansy!
I would think we could count votes to punish (i.e., ban or revocation of privileges) versus votes to do nothing/warn and proceed from there, Coyote.
---
What should constitute a quorum to declare that enough of the Senate has weighed in on a particular issue?
---
What should constitute a quorum to declare that enough of the Senate has weighed in on a particular issue?
A Government founded upon justice, and recognizing the equal rights of all men; claiming higher authority for existence, or sanction for its laws, that nature, reason, and the regularly ascertained will of the people; steadily refusing to put its sword and purse in the service of any religious creed or family is a standing offense to most of the Governments of the world, and to some narrow and bigoted people among ourselves.
F. Douglass
- CmdrWilkens
- Emperor's Hand
- Posts: 9093
- Joined: 2002-07-06 01:24am
- Location: Land of the Crabcake
- Contact:
I would think it should be roughly this:
Category A:
Board Policies/Senate Rules/Bannings/Usergroups: 60% of votes given
Category B
Titling/Lesser Offenses/Resolutions:50% +1 of votes given
Election to the Senate: Plurality of votes given
A quorum of 40% would be required for the Category B votes and a quorum of 50% on Category A votes amongst eligible voters (which obviously is now redefined as all Senators and Governors excepting the Chancellor). We might then need to add a provision that tie-breaking votes should only be cast in Category B elections and Category A should default to a negative.
Category A:
Board Policies/Senate Rules/Bannings/Usergroups: 60% of votes given
Category B
Titling/Lesser Offenses/Resolutions:50% +1 of votes given
Election to the Senate: Plurality of votes given
A quorum of 40% would be required for the Category B votes and a quorum of 50% on Category A votes amongst eligible voters (which obviously is now redefined as all Senators and Governors excepting the Chancellor). We might then need to add a provision that tie-breaking votes should only be cast in Category B elections and Category A should default to a negative.
SDNet World Nation: Wilkonia
Armourer of the WARWOLVES
ASVS Vet's Association (Class of 2000)
Former C.S. Strowbridge Gold Ego Award Winner
MEMBER of the Anti-PETA Anti-Facist LEAGUE
ASVS Vet's Association (Class of 2000)
Former C.S. Strowbridge Gold Ego Award Winner
MEMBER of the Anti-PETA Anti-Facist LEAGUE
"I put no stock in religion. By the word religion I have seen the lunacy of fanatics of every denomination be called the will of god. I have seen too much religion in the eyes of too many murderers. Holiness is in right action, and courage on behalf of those who cannot defend themselves, and goodness. "
-Kingdom of Heaven
- RedImperator
- Roosevelt Republican
- Posts: 16465
- Joined: 2002-07-11 07:59pm
- Location: Delaware
- Contact:
CmdrWilken's proposal makes a good deal of sense. It has my backing. I don't think a 66% supermajority is necessary. If 60% of the senate agrees on something, that should be enough.
Any city gets what it admires, will pay for, and, ultimately, deserves…We want and deserve tin-can architecture in a tinhorn culture. And we will probably be judged not by the monuments we build but by those we have destroyed.--Ada Louise Huxtable, "Farewell to Penn Station", New York Times editorial, 30 October 1963
X-Ray Blues
X-Ray Blues
- GrandMasterTerwynn
- Emperor's Hand
- Posts: 6787
- Joined: 2002-07-29 06:14pm
- Location: Somewhere on Earth.
I agree wholeheartedly. So I'll throw my support behind his proposal as well.RedImperator wrote:CmdrWilken's proposal makes a good deal of sense. It has my backing. I don't think a 66% supermajority is necessary. If 60% of the senate agrees on something, that should be enough.
Tales of the Known Worlds:
2070s - The Seventy-Niners ... 3500s - Fair as Death ... 4900s - Against Improbable Odds V 1.0
2070s - The Seventy-Niners ... 3500s - Fair as Death ... 4900s - Against Improbable Odds V 1.0
- Broomstick
- Emperor's Hand
- Posts: 28830
- Joined: 2004-01-02 07:04pm
- Location: Industrial armpit of the US Midwest
Um... would it help if I got my ass over to the other thread and voted?
I haven't voted on Munky because I haven't encountered him in any threads I've been in (or at least not that I can recall) and I didn't think I should be voting thumbs up/down on an issue I knew nothing about. Given an insane work week last week I didn't have the Mon-Fri time to research the issue, and I was out of state/off planet most of the weekend.
Which makes me wonder if perhaps we need an "abstain" choice sometimes for folks who have reasons to not vote, but don't want to hold up decision making...?
EDIT
Nevermind, I see I missed the vote. On the other hand, I'll leave my question about potential uses of "abstain" on the table.
I haven't voted on Munky because I haven't encountered him in any threads I've been in (or at least not that I can recall) and I didn't think I should be voting thumbs up/down on an issue I knew nothing about. Given an insane work week last week I didn't have the Mon-Fri time to research the issue, and I was out of state/off planet most of the weekend.
Which makes me wonder if perhaps we need an "abstain" choice sometimes for folks who have reasons to not vote, but don't want to hold up decision making...?
EDIT
Nevermind, I see I missed the vote. On the other hand, I'll leave my question about potential uses of "abstain" on the table.
A life is like a garden. Perfect moments can be had, but not preserved, except in memory. Leonard Nimoy.
Now I did a job. I got nothing but trouble since I did it, not to mention more than a few unkind words as regard to my character so let me make this abundantly clear. I do the job. And then I get paid.- Malcolm Reynolds, Captain of Serenity, which sums up my feelings regarding the lawsuit discussed here.
If a free society cannot help the many who are poor, it cannot save the few who are rich. - John F. Kennedy
Sam Vimes Theory of Economic Injustice
Now I did a job. I got nothing but trouble since I did it, not to mention more than a few unkind words as regard to my character so let me make this abundantly clear. I do the job. And then I get paid.- Malcolm Reynolds, Captain of Serenity, which sums up my feelings regarding the lawsuit discussed here.
If a free society cannot help the many who are poor, it cannot save the few who are rich. - John F. Kennedy
Sam Vimes Theory of Economic Injustice
- CmdrWilkens
- Emperor's Hand
- Posts: 9093
- Joined: 2002-07-06 01:24am
- Location: Land of the Crabcake
- Contact:
I think we should add an abstain option to every poll so that such votes could be added to the total recieved so as to make quorum. These obviously would not count in the affirmative towards any of the majority/pluralities needed for votes.
SDNet World Nation: Wilkonia
Armourer of the WARWOLVES
ASVS Vet's Association (Class of 2000)
Former C.S. Strowbridge Gold Ego Award Winner
MEMBER of the Anti-PETA Anti-Facist LEAGUE
ASVS Vet's Association (Class of 2000)
Former C.S. Strowbridge Gold Ego Award Winner
MEMBER of the Anti-PETA Anti-Facist LEAGUE
"I put no stock in religion. By the word religion I have seen the lunacy of fanatics of every denomination be called the will of god. I have seen too much religion in the eyes of too many murderers. Holiness is in right action, and courage on behalf of those who cannot defend themselves, and goodness. "
-Kingdom of Heaven
- Stuart Mackey
- Drunken Kiwi Editor of the ASVS Press
- Posts: 5946
- Joined: 2002-07-04 12:28am
- Location: New Zealand
- Contact:
Agreed. Its nice and simple to administer as well.CmdrWilkens wrote:I would think it should be roughly this:
snip
Via money Europe could become political in five years" "... the current communities should be completed by a Finance Common Market which would lead us to European economic unity. Only then would ... the mutual commitments make it fairly easy to produce the political union which is the goal"
Jean Omer Marie Gabriel Monnet
--------------
Jean Omer Marie Gabriel Monnet
--------------
- CmdrWilkens
- Emperor's Hand
- Posts: 9093
- Joined: 2002-07-06 01:24am
- Location: Land of the Crabcake
- Contact:
I'd like to let the discussion run a couple more days but say about Friday or so I'm gonna put my proposal forward along with the provision on abstaining. So yeah here I go with working out procedures and rules, two votes inside of a month: its the stuff I'm good at .
SDNet World Nation: Wilkonia
Armourer of the WARWOLVES
ASVS Vet's Association (Class of 2000)
Former C.S. Strowbridge Gold Ego Award Winner
MEMBER of the Anti-PETA Anti-Facist LEAGUE
ASVS Vet's Association (Class of 2000)
Former C.S. Strowbridge Gold Ego Award Winner
MEMBER of the Anti-PETA Anti-Facist LEAGUE
"I put no stock in religion. By the word religion I have seen the lunacy of fanatics of every denomination be called the will of god. I have seen too much religion in the eyes of too many murderers. Holiness is in right action, and courage on behalf of those who cannot defend themselves, and goodness. "
-Kingdom of Heaven