RM Schultz

Post by **Ghost Rider** » 2006-10-13 06:42pm

If you missed his fantastic debut, here ya go!

As for Rule violations...many and honestly if you need the list, I will gladly provide.

PR 4: On this forum, it is considered perfectly acceptable to flame people simply for being dishonest or stupid, no matter how polite they are. I am aware that on most forums, stupidity or dishonesty alone are not considered grounds for flaming. However, those forums' rules do not apply here.

DR 4:Do not use someone's rudeness as an excuse to ignore his points.

DR 5: Do not employ the "broken record" debating style. Continuously repeating yourself regardless of what others say is a quick way to get banned.

DR 6: If you are asked for evidence to support a claim you've made, you should either produce this evidence or concede the point until such time as you can produce this evidence. People who consistently ignore requests for evidence to support their claims (particularly contentious claims) are not looked upon kindly here.

DR 7: If you dismiss an argument because of its use of profanity, you can be instantly banned.

So guys and gals of the Senate and Mods, what shall we do with the one note wonder?

1. Label him with the VI title and continue to amuse us?

2. Temporary Ban? Perhaps time away will do him good.

or

3. Permanent Ban? He's a broken record of uselessness.

Up for five days...should be enough time to decide.

Post by **LadyTevar** » 2006-10-13 06:49pm

I count 5 seperate rules broken.

Ban his unworthy ass.

Post by **Surlethe** » 2006-10-13 06:57pm

He still entertains me. Brand him a Village Idiot, and keep him around until either he loses interest or we lose interest.

GrandMasterTerwynn · Post by **GrandMasterTerwynn** » 2006-10-13 10:37pm

He got an offensive custom title in his first three posts. And he debates like a broken record, clinging desperately to anecdotal evidence. Really, he serves no purpose other than to keep that turd of a thread in the HoS clogging up the drainpipe.

Mind crush . . . I mean, ban!

CmdrWilkens · Post by **CmdrWilkens** » 2006-10-13 11:11pm

He's like a broken record. His point remains unchanged and yet has never addressed the actual matter under debate despite being told that this was the problem repeatedly. While I wouldn't mind getting a couple of whacks in just to make sure I'm still up to speed this guy is beyond reaching and not worth it any more.

Post by **Darth Wong** » 2006-10-14 11:45am

The last two exchanges have proven beyond any reasonable doubt that he has no intention of debating the points.

Knife · Post by **Knife** » 2006-10-14 01:20pm

I vote for vi for nothing more than all his shit is contained in that one thread. Some how I doubt he'll hand around here much, nor spread his wall of ignorance into other threads.

seanrobertson · Post by **seanrobertson** » 2006-10-15 11:00am

A ripe target for Scourge and the Sweeps, I say.

Post by **Edi** » 2006-10-15 05:04pm

Ban.

Edi

Post by **The Yosemite Bear** » 2006-10-16 04:41pm

erm fallacious WOI, circular logic, and a hatfucker whose reminding me of the Mormon we just let go of at work. (remind me, never tell your boss that she's immoral, wrong and a devient)

Post by **Ghost Rider** » 2006-10-17 02:18pm

Locking, because Mike ended this poll rather effectively. Poor fucker in the end didn't even try.

StarDestroyer.Net BBS

RM Schultz

What to do?

RM Schultz