Best tank of WWII

OT: anything goes!

Moderator: Edi

Best tank of WWII?

TigerI
2
10%
Panther
4
19%
T-34
14
67%
Other
1
5%
 
Total votes: 21

User avatar
Sea Skimmer
Yankee Capitalist Air Pirate
Posts: 37390
Joined: 2002-07-03 11:49pm
Location: Passchendaele City, HAB

Post by Sea Skimmer »

Frank Hipper wrote:Japanese and Italian armor in the war was tragically comic. Or is that comedically tragic. Either way, PEEE-YOO! And Germany built some stinkers early on.
Italy produced some good assault guns in early 1942.

Japan actually built a few hundred tanks with long 75mm guns that might have be able to combat Sherman's, at least on the defensive. Too bad the only ones that got out of Japan went to central China.
"This cult of special forces is as sensible as to form a Royal Corps of Tree Climbers and say that no soldier who does not wear its green hat with a bunch of oak leaves stuck in it should be expected to climb a tree"
— Field Marshal William Slim 1956
User avatar
Frank Hipper
Overfiend of the Superego
Posts: 12882
Joined: 2002-10-17 08:48am
Location: Hamilton, Ohio?

Post by Frank Hipper »

Sea Skimmer wrote:
Frank Hipper wrote:Japanese and Italian armor in the war was tragically comic. Or is that comedically tragic. Either way, PEEE-YOO! And Germany built some stinkers early on.
Italy produced some good assault guns in early 1942.

Japan actually built a few hundred tanks with long 75mm guns that might have be able to combat Sherman's, at least on the defensive. Too bad the only ones that got out of Japan went to central China.
Actually, it`s kinda GOOD they went to China, but I`ve never heard of them before. Any ideas where I could find some photos? Sounds cool.
Image
Life is all the eternity you get, use it wisely.
User avatar
Sea Skimmer
Yankee Capitalist Air Pirate
Posts: 37390
Joined: 2002-07-03 11:49pm
Location: Passchendaele City, HAB

Post by Sea Skimmer »

Frank Hipper wrote:
Sea Skimmer wrote:
Frank Hipper wrote:Japanese and Italian armor in the war was tragically comic. Or is that comedically tragic. Either way, PEEE-YOO! And Germany built some stinkers early on.
Italy produced some good assault guns in early 1942.

Japan actually built a few hundred tanks with long 75mm guns that might have be able to combat Sherman's, at least on the defensive. Too bad the only ones that got out of Japan went to central China.
Actually, it`s kinda GOOD they went to China, but I`ve never heard of them before. Any ideas where I could find some photos? Sounds cool.
Look up the Type 4 and Type 5. Both had the type 88 75mm AA gun and two machine guns. The type four weight 30 tons and had 75mm of armor. Top speed was 28 mph with a 400 HP diesel engine. The Type 5 added a 37mm cannon in the front hull, and weighted 37 tons. The engine was a German BMW petrol aircraft engine of 550 HP, which also gave a speed of 28mph. This engine was adapted to get the type five into production quickly.

I have however noted that I confused my production numbers, only a handful, something like 50 Type 4's and Fives got built. It was several hundred Type 3's, which got built. This tank also had a 75mm gun but it was fairly low velocity adoption of a field gun.

I'm not aware of any picutres of the type 4 or 5, but I've seen a few faloting around for the type 3. You might just try a web search.


Central China was not a very good place to send what little modern armor Japan had. The Chinese nationalists had next to no armor of their own, and where hard pressed to deal with totally obsolete tanks which could be destroyed with ease by American troops. The Philippines would be the best place to deploy them, followed by Japan it self. At the least they should have gone to Northern China. Nothing was going to stop the T-34 hoard, but the terrain might have allowed for some use.

Really the plains around Tokyo where the only place in the Empire Japan could mass a sufficient man, vehicle and artillery power to combat American divisional forces openly. Though only then in poor weather.

I'm very tired, so if part of this doesn't make sense let me know, I'm not up to proof reading it right now..
"This cult of special forces is as sensible as to form a Royal Corps of Tree Climbers and say that no soldier who does not wear its green hat with a bunch of oak leaves stuck in it should be expected to climb a tree"
— Field Marshal William Slim 1956
User avatar
TrailerParkJawa
Sith Acolyte
Posts: 5850
Joined: 2002-07-04 11:49pm
Location: San Jose, California

Post by TrailerParkJawa »

Italy's L.3/35 tanklet didn't see much service in WW2. However in Ethiopia in 1935 scores where destroyed by Ethiopian troops, in some cases unarmed men overwhelmed them, jammed the tracks with wood branches then yank them off before pulled open the hatches and beating the crews to death.
Sucks to be those crews.


I was surprised to find out that the T-34 was designed by an American.
User avatar
Frank Hipper
Overfiend of the Superego
Posts: 12882
Joined: 2002-10-17 08:48am
Location: Hamilton, Ohio?

Post by Frank Hipper »

You`re making sense, but I`m utterly exhausted myself. The gist of it being good to send them to China was that it was good for the Allies.
Image
Life is all the eternity you get, use it wisely.
User avatar
Soulman
Padawan Learner
Posts: 331
Joined: 2002-07-04 02:27pm

Post by Soulman »

TrailerParkJawa wrote:

I was surprised to find out that the T-34 was designed by an American.
The T-34 was Russian designed (initial work was done by M. I. Koshkin but the design was finished by A. A. Morozov), you are probably thinking about the suspension which was Christie suspension or the engine which was IIRC based on an American truck engine with two driving the tank.

Later M4s with the 76mm gun were very good tanks and had good armour as well as the excellent gun, although outmatched by the much heavier Panther it was better than the Pz.IV.

My personal favourite is the T-34, it was crudely built but it was a good overall design and simple to build. It was the perfect tank for the Russians.
User avatar
Sea Skimmer
Yankee Capitalist Air Pirate
Posts: 37390
Joined: 2002-07-03 11:49pm
Location: Passchendaele City, HAB

Post by Sea Skimmer »

Soulman wrote:
TrailerParkJawa wrote:

I was surprised to find out that the T-34 was designed by an American.
The T-34 was Russian designed (initial work was done by M. I. Koshkin but the design was finished by A. A. Morozov), you are probably thinking about the suspension which was Christie suspension or the engine which was IIRC based on an American truck engine with two driving the tank.

Later M4s with the 76mm gun were very good tanks and had good armour as well as the excellent gun, although outmatched by the much heavier Panther it was better than the Pz.IV.

My personal favourite is the T-34, it was crudely built but it was a good overall design and simple to build. It was the perfect tank for the Russians.
Of course while the Panther was better, it also cost far more in all respects to build. You could have several Shermans for the same cost and while that would use up more manpower, the effectiveness in combat would be greater. It also balances out since far fewer infantrymen get killedb ecuase theres so much armor on hand to support them. Thats what the SHerman was built for really, the Army tank destroyer force was suppost to kill the tanks. However the 75mm gun was not to bad for anti armor, and the 76 and 77mm 17 pounder guns later fitted where highly effective. Heck a shortened 17 pounder remain in service on the A34 for decades after the war. Finland still had some in service in the late 70's.
"This cult of special forces is as sensible as to form a Royal Corps of Tree Climbers and say that no soldier who does not wear its green hat with a bunch of oak leaves stuck in it should be expected to climb a tree"
— Field Marshal William Slim 1956
User avatar
Vympel
Spetsnaz
Spetsnaz
Posts: 29312
Joined: 2002-07-19 01:08am
Location: Sydney Australia

Post by Vympel »

The King Tiger doesn't really deserve a mention. Too heavy, underpowered, overarmored and overgunned. A total waste of resources- it didn't justify it's incredible cost/complexity in the slightest.

The Germans should've standardized- they had far too many types in service.

T-34/85 gets my vote.
Like Legend of Galactic Heroes? Please contribute to http://gineipaedia.com/
User avatar
starfury
Jedi Master
Posts: 1297
Joined: 2002-07-03 08:28pm
Location: aboard the ISD II Broadsword

Post by starfury »

T-34/85, both very easily built and still having decent fighting quality, this later variant also have a fairly large and powerful gun.
"a single death is a tragedy, a million deaths are a statistic"-Joseph Stalin

"No plan survives contact with the enemy"-Helmuth Von Moltke

"Women prefer stories about one person dying slowly. Men prefer stories of many people dying quickly."-Niles from Frasier.
Post Reply