How the hell does "Braveheart" qualify as Sci-Fi ?

OT: anything goes!

Moderator: Edi

Post Reply
User avatar
Sokar
Jedi Master
Posts: 1369
Joined: 2002-07-04 02:24am

How the hell does "Braveheart" qualify as Sci-Fi ?

Post by Sokar »

I as watching "Stargate" on the Sci-Fi Channel just a few minutes ago and they had an ad for "Braveheart" as one of there Scinema Events......WTF!!?? Did I miss the William Wallace as a clone alien hybrid scene, or is Sci-Fi just giving up on original programming altogether and becoming TNT with John Edward? Fuck, I might as well cancle cable, Sci-Fi was abouty the only thing I ever watch , now no Farscape, no B5(at a decent time when Im home) and that fucking coniving con man John Edward on all the fucking time.......Fuck it.......
BotM
User avatar
GrandMasterTerwynn
Emperor's Hand
Posts: 6787
Joined: 2002-07-29 06:14pm
Location: Somewhere on Earth.

Re: How the hell does "Braveheart" qualify as Sci-

Post by GrandMasterTerwynn »

Sokar wrote:I as watching "Stargate" on the Sci-Fi Channel just a few minutes ago and they had an ad for "Braveheart" as one of there Scinema Events......WTF!!?? Did I miss the William Wallace as a clone alien hybrid scene, or is Sci-Fi just giving up on original programming altogether and becoming TNT with John Edward? Fuck, I might as well cancle cable, Sci-Fi was abouty the only thing I ever watch , now no Farscape, no B5(at a decent time when Im home) and that fucking coniving con man John Edward on all the fucking time.......Fuck it.......
Sci-Fi is apparently run by a group of people who know nothing about science fiction. As a result, they've been moving it toward more "conventional" stuff with just a little sci fi thrown in.
User avatar
Sea Skimmer
Yankee Capitalist Air Pirate
Posts: 37390
Joined: 2002-07-03 11:49pm
Location: Passchendaele City, HAB

Post by Sea Skimmer »

Because it was devoiced from real life when it came to the reality of what it portrayed?
"This cult of special forces is as sensible as to form a Royal Corps of Tree Climbers and say that no soldier who does not wear its green hat with a bunch of oak leaves stuck in it should be expected to climb a tree"
— Field Marshal William Slim 1956
User avatar
neoolong
Dead Sexy 'Shroom
Posts: 13180
Joined: 2002-08-29 10:01pm
Location: California

Post by neoolong »

Don't forget they have a number of orginal made-for-tv movies. Some of them aren't that bad. I actually liked the one with Bruce Campbell and Chase Masterson. And, I'm glad that Stargate Sg-1 got renewed for a seventh season.
Member of the BotM. @( !.! )@
User avatar
Dalton
For Those About to Rock We Salute You
For Those About to Rock We Salute You
Posts: 22637
Joined: 2002-07-03 06:16pm
Location: New York, the Fuck You State
Contact:

Re: How the hell does "Braveheart" qualify as Sci-

Post by Dalton »

Sokar wrote:I as watching "Stargate" on the Sci-Fi Channel just a few minutes ago and they had an ad for "Braveheart" as one of there Scinema Events......WTF!!?? Did I miss the William Wallace as a clone alien hybrid scene, or is Sci-Fi just giving up on original programming altogether and becoming TNT with John Edward? Fuck, I might as well cancle cable, Sci-Fi was abouty the only thing I ever watch , now no Farscape, no B5(at a decent time when Im home) and that fucking coniving con man John Edward on all the fucking time.......Fuck it.......
What Terwynn said. Seems that they're trying to broaden their range - and their ratings - at the expense of the channel's original target audience. Either that or they're taking whatever syndication deals they can get.
Image
Image
To Absent Friends
Dalton | Admin Smash | Knight of the Order of SDN

"y = mx + bro" - Surlethe
"You try THAT shit again, kid, and I will mod you. I will
mod you so hard, you'll wish I were Dalton." - Lagmonster

May the way of the Hero lead to the Triforce.
User avatar
Sokar
Jedi Master
Posts: 1369
Joined: 2002-07-04 02:24am

Post by Sokar »

Ok , they do win a point for SG-1, but their made for tv-movies have sucked major ass....Sabertooth, come on.........and the one with the giant pin wheel in Nepal were lousy , I can't say about the one with Masterson (hottie) and Campbell (B-Movie God that he is) .........Sci-Fi just plain sucks right now

As to "BH" being divorced from reality, I know its about as accurate as a class of third graders re-enacting Omaha beach......but thats not the point, its NOT in any way, shape or form SCIENCE FICTION......which I thought was the whole point behind having a Sci-Fi Network.
BotM
User avatar
neoolong
Dead Sexy 'Shroom
Posts: 13180
Joined: 2002-08-29 10:01pm
Location: California

Post by neoolong »

Sokar wrote:Ok , they do win a point for SG-1, but their made for tv-movies have sucked major ass....Sabertooth, come on.........and the one with the giant pin wheel in Nepal were lousy , I can't say about the one with Masterson (hottie) and Campbell (B-Movie God that he is) .........Sci-Fi just plain sucks right now

As to "BH" being divorced from reality, I know its about as accurate as a class of third graders re-enacting Omaha beach......but thats not the point, its NOT in any way, shape or form SCIENCE FICTION......which I thought was the whole point behind having a Sci-Fi Network.
You would think that putting Crossing Over on a science fiction channel would tell people what it really is.

The sci-fi channel has really lost its way.
Member of the BotM. @( !.! )@
User avatar
Sokar
Jedi Master
Posts: 1369
Joined: 2002-07-04 02:24am

Post by Sokar »

Do not even get me started on that bastard John Edward.....Loathing does'nt even start to illustrate the depth of my disgust for that smug huckster. The fact that a known phony and con artist can get his own show just appals me to no end, makes me want to re-read Sagans "Demon Haunted World" just to purge any trace of his filth from my system
BotM
User avatar
Patrick Degan
Emperor's Hand
Posts: 14847
Joined: 2002-07-15 08:06am
Location: Orleanian in exile

Post by Patrick Degan »

I believe that whichever genius at SciFi thought to run Braveheart on their lineup saw the fact that William Wallace, in the movie, communes with the ghosts of his father and murdered lover; thereby including a supernatural element and thus "qualifies" it under the broad rubric of fantasy.

Though I like the theory that Braveheart could be defined as SF or fantasy considering that any resemblance between the movie and the actual history of William Wallace is purely coincidental. 8)

One of the main reasons why BH wound up on the SciFi lineup is due to the fact that USA Networks, which own SciFi, hold the syndication rights to this movie and will use it to fill time on the SciFi lineup just as they use The Stand to fill time on USA.

And the programming philosophy of the Channel... well, just don't get me started on that rant.
User avatar
Vympel
Spetsnaz
Spetsnaz
Posts: 29312
Joined: 2002-07-19 01:08am
Location: Sydney Australia

Post by Vympel »

Patrick Degan wrote:I believe that whichever genius at SciFi thought to run Braveheart on their lineup saw the fact that William Wallace, in the movie, communes with the ghosts of his father and murdered lover; thereby including a supernatural element and thus "qualifies" it under the broad rubric of fantasy.

Though I like the theory that Braveheart could be defined as SF or fantasy considering that any resemblance between the movie and the actual history of William Wallace is purely coincidental. 8)

One of the main reasons why BH wound up on the SciFi lineup is due to the fact that USA Networks, which own SciFi, hold the syndication rights to this movie and will use it to fill time on the SciFi lineup just as they use The Stand to fill time on USA.

And the programming philosophy of the Channel... well, just don't get me started on that rant.
The Stand SUCKED ASS.

That is all.
Like Legend of Galactic Heroes? Please contribute to http://gineipaedia.com/
User avatar
m112880
Padawan Learner
Posts: 167
Joined: 2002-10-09 06:28pm
Location: Kentucky

Post by m112880 »

After beaveheart they have the 13th warror on.
User avatar
Stormbringer
King of Democracy
Posts: 22678
Joined: 2002-07-15 11:22pm

Post by Stormbringer »

m112880 wrote:After beaveheart they have the 13th warror on.
You can sort of sqeeze Eaters of the Dead (I refuse to call it that dumb name) by if you're liberal. But I can't see Braveheart.
Image
User avatar
Sea Skimmer
Yankee Capitalist Air Pirate
Posts: 37390
Joined: 2002-07-03 11:49pm
Location: Passchendaele City, HAB

Post by Sea Skimmer »

Stormbringer wrote:
m112880 wrote:After beaveheart they have the 13th warror on.
You can sort of sqeeze Eaters of the Dead (I refuse to call it that dumb name) by if you're liberal. But I can't see Braveheart.
I prefer my own name for it "Why man invented the automatic weapon"

But it is significantly closer to being sci fi then Braveheart.
"This cult of special forces is as sensible as to form a Royal Corps of Tree Climbers and say that no soldier who does not wear its green hat with a bunch of oak leaves stuck in it should be expected to climb a tree"
— Field Marshal William Slim 1956
HemlockGrey
Fucking Awesome
Posts: 13834
Joined: 2002-07-04 03:21pm

Post by HemlockGrey »

John Edwards, if you think about it, fits in perfect in the science fiction channel, sans 'science'.
The End of Suburbia
"If more cars are inevitable, must there not be roads for them to run on?"
-Robert Moses

"The Wire" is the best show in the history of television. Watch it today.
Skelron
Jedi Master
Posts: 1431
Joined: 2002-07-04 10:48pm
Location: The Web Way...

Post by Skelron »

Although it won't mean much to American's our Sci-Fi channel over here in the UK is actually quite good, the furthurest from Sci-Fi thewy got was a programme they ran called Unthinkable which still sounded like a great programme.... (It was on at a time where I am guareented to never get the TV... I.E before Midnight and after 4PM )

But on the theme of... Channels no longer having anything in common with the name they carry, UK Gold's programming seems to include more and More US stuff... where I can't even hear a UK extra.... ever! Names of stations rarely if ever it seems have anything to do with the contents, oh well.
Post Reply