Best and Worse Book to Films

OT: anything goes!

Moderator: Edi

User avatar
Glocksman
Emperor's Hand
Posts: 7233
Joined: 2002-09-03 06:43pm
Location: Mr. Five by Five

Post by Glocksman »

Danny Bhoy wrote:
Glocksman wrote:Hunt for Red October was a good book made into a shitty movie.
I will confess to placing Battlefield Earth into this category as well. :oops:
I loved the book but hated the movie.
HFRO the movie was mediocre at best. The rest of the TC into movie was shit. Of course to do justice to Clear and Present Danger, it should be a mini-series or an entire TV season.

Movies from Clive Cussler flicks should be destroyed the moment some idiot thinks that they're a good idea. I liked the Pitt stories, but Raise the Titanic and Sahara movies were beyond clusterfucks.
God, I (mercifully) forgot about the Raise the Titanic movie, and I never even knew they made a Sahara movie.
Some of the Pitt books (Vixen 03 in particular) were pretty good, but Raise the Titanic the movie blew donkey balls. :roll:
"You say that it is your custom to burn widows. Very well. We also have a custom: when men burn a woman alive, we tie a rope around their necks and we hang them. Build your funeral pyre; beside it, my carpenters will build a gallows. You may follow your custom. And then we will follow ours."- General Sir Charles Napier

Oderint dum metuant
User avatar
Lost Soal
Sith Devotee
Posts: 2615
Joined: 2002-10-22 06:25am
Location: Back in Newcastle.

Post by Lost Soal »

dacis2 wrote:generally Tom Clancy books are a wee bit too long to make a faithful adaptation.

HFRO ignored the fleet bits, the decoy bits, etc. while CAPD really compressed the whole abandoned desperate fighting thing.


As for what I'm hoping for that turns out well is the Honor Harrington movie in the pipeline.
What about Sum of all Fears. I haven't read it, but I did listen to the comentary where Clancy introduced himself as "author of the book they ignored." Then for most of the movie took the piss out of how innacurate everything they were showing was.

EDIT: Changed book title
"May God stand between you and harm in all the empty places where you must walk." - Ancient Egyptian Blessing

Ivanova is always right.
I will listen to Ivanova.
I will not ignore Ivanova's recommendations. Ivanova is God.
AND, if this ever happens again, Ivanova will personally rip your lungs out! - Babylon 5 Mantra

There is no "I" in TEAM. There is a ME however.
User avatar
Danny Bhoy
Jedi Knight
Posts: 718
Joined: 2005-03-24 07:48am
Location: Singapore

Post by Danny Bhoy »

Lost Soal wrote:What about Sum of all Fears. I haven't read it, but I did listen to the comentary where Clancy introduced himself as "author of the book they ignored." Then for most of the movie took the piss out of how innacurate everything they were showing was.

EDIT: Changed book title
The scene where the Backfires clobbered the CVN, they should recycle and upgrade that bit for the Dance of the Vampires scene of Red Storm Rising. Throw in SAMs from the escorts going out to intercept the ASCMs, it'll be good enough. That was probably the only bit of SOAF the movie that I liked.
User avatar
Frank Hipper
Overfiend of the Superego
Posts: 12882
Joined: 2002-10-17 08:48am
Location: Hamilton, Ohio?

Post by Frank Hipper »

Lost Soal wrote:I just remembered a book which was uterly changed for the film and fucked it up. The Running Man.
The show is called The Running Man, and he is called Ben Richards. Other than that, I think the script writer saw the title and thought, Ummm, I'll write a film called that.
Yes!

Talk about insulting the source material!
Arnold Schwarzenegger's character was supposed to be suffering from malnutrition and trying to win money so he could buy antibiotics for his kid who had the flu, and was likely to die...

Ah-nuld?

Malnourished?

...Awful.
Image
Life is all the eternity you get, use it wisely.
User avatar
Lost Soal
Sith Devotee
Posts: 2615
Joined: 2002-10-22 06:25am
Location: Back in Newcastle.

Post by Lost Soal »

Frank Hipper wrote:
Lost Soal wrote:I just remembered a book which was uterly changed for the film and fucked it up. The Running Man.
The show is called The Running Man, and he is called Ben Richards. Other than that, I think the script writer saw the title and thought, Ummm, I'll write a film called that.
Yes!

Talk about insulting the source material!
Arnold Schwarzenegger's character was supposed to be suffering from malnutrition and trying to win money so he could buy antibiotics for his kid who had the flu, and was likely to die...

Ah-nuld?

Malnourished?

...Awful.
Don't forget dieing. But this isn't the Terminator and he's a star now. And of course with the ending there is now no chance in hell that it will ever be made properly. Any director who tried would be made to look like the devil himself.
"May God stand between you and harm in all the empty places where you must walk." - Ancient Egyptian Blessing

Ivanova is always right.
I will listen to Ivanova.
I will not ignore Ivanova's recommendations. Ivanova is God.
AND, if this ever happens again, Ivanova will personally rip your lungs out! - Babylon 5 Mantra

There is no "I" in TEAM. There is a ME however.
solitaryshell
Redshirt
Posts: 13
Joined: 2005-11-26 01:13am

Post by solitaryshell »

The movie version of "The Last Unicorn" was almost word for word from the book, so I thought that movie adaptation was good.

I also thought the movie of The Great Gatsby was pretty good and accurate to the book.

I agree with those who posted earlier, The Time Machine was a horrible adaptation. Did the movie have anything in common with the book other than the title??

Oh, and so far as I've seen, every Frankenstein movie has been awful, which is terrible considering how wonderful the book is.
User avatar
The Dark
Emperor's Hand
Posts: 7378
Joined: 2002-10-31 10:28pm
Location: Promoting ornithological awareness

Post by The Dark »

The Postman was a horrid translation to movie. I liked the novel, but I had to watch the movie three times to finally see the whole thing without falling asleep.
Stanley Hauerwas wrote:[W]hy is it that no one is angry at the inequality of income in this country? I mean, the inequality of income is unbelievable. Unbelievable. Why isn’t that ever an issue of politics? Because you don’t live in a democracy. You live in a plutocracy. Money rules.
BattleTech for SilCore
User avatar
SylasGaunt
Sith Acolyte
Posts: 5267
Joined: 2002-09-04 09:39pm
Location: GGG

Post by SylasGaunt »

Frank Hipper wrote:
Talk about insulting the source material!
Arnold Schwarzenegger's character was supposed to be suffering from malnutrition and trying to win money so he could buy antibiotics for his kid who had the flu, and was likely to die...

Ah-nuld?

Malnourished?

...Awful.
Horrible adaption yes but damn was that movie fun.
Pick
Sith Marauder
Posts: 3690
Joined: 2005-01-06 12:35am
Location: Oregon, the land of trees and rain!

Post by Pick »

Having just seen it, Lion Witch and the Wardrobe is the best book-to-movie I think I've ever seen. Not because it was a top-top-tier movie, but because the book was fucking awful upon reflection, and I found the movie to be artistically beautiful (as for the plot, er, I wasn't paying too much attention, honestly.)
"The rest of the poem plays upon that pun. On the contrary, says Catullus, although my verses are soft (molliculi ac parum pudici in line 8, reversing the play on words), they can arouse even limp old men. Should Furius and Aurelius have any remaining doubts about Catullus' virility, he offers to fuck them anally and orally to prove otherwise." - Catullus 16, Wikipedia
Image
User avatar
Metatwaddle
Jedi Council Member
Posts: 1910
Joined: 2003-07-07 07:29am
Location: Up the Amazon on a Rubber Duck
Contact:

Post by Metatwaddle »

Pick wrote:Having just seen it, Lion Witch and the Wardrobe is the best book-to-movie I think I've ever seen. Not because it was a top-top-tier movie, but because the book was fucking awful upon reflection, and I found the movie to be artistically beautiful (as for the plot, er, I wasn't paying too much attention, honestly.)
Agreed. I loved it in fourth grade, but now it just seems so fucking preachy. And C.S. Lewis pisses me off. My dad loves him, though.
Should any political party attempt to abolish social security, unemployment insurance, and eliminate labor laws and farm programs, you would not hear of that party again in our political history. There is a tiny splinter group, of course, that believes you can do these things... their number is negligible and they are stupid. --Dwight D. Eisenhower
Pick
Sith Marauder
Posts: 3690
Joined: 2005-01-06 12:35am
Location: Oregon, the land of trees and rain!

Post by Pick »

Discombobulated wrote:
Pick wrote:Having just seen it, Lion Witch and the Wardrobe is the best book-to-movie I think I've ever seen. Not because it was a top-top-tier movie, but because the book was fucking awful upon reflection, and I found the movie to be artistically beautiful (as for the plot, er, I wasn't paying too much attention, honestly.)
Agreed. I loved it in fourth grade, but now it just seems so fucking preachy. And C.S. Lewis pisses me off. My dad loves him, though.
Yeah, see, I was really into it in fourth grade too! I didn't have the perception then of the CS Lewis I percieve now (wanker.) So I picked up my old copy before I went to the movie, just to read the introduction again, but I found myself incapable. I hate his writing style, and his story. It washed over me like the memory of a delicious pie that proved to be full of maggot. Jesus maggots.
"The rest of the poem plays upon that pun. On the contrary, says Catullus, although my verses are soft (molliculi ac parum pudici in line 8, reversing the play on words), they can arouse even limp old men. Should Furius and Aurelius have any remaining doubts about Catullus' virility, he offers to fuck them anally and orally to prove otherwise." - Catullus 16, Wikipedia
Image
User avatar
The Duchess of Zeon
Gözde
Posts: 14566
Joined: 2002-09-18 01:06am
Location: Exiled in the Pale of Settlement.

Post by The Duchess of Zeon »

Pick wrote:
Yeah, see, I was really into it in fourth grade too! I didn't have the perception then of the CS Lewis I percieve now (wanker.) So I picked up my old copy before I went to the movie, just to read the introduction again, but I found myself incapable. I hate his writing style, and his story. It washed over me like the memory of a delicious pie that proved to be full of maggot. Jesus maggots.
Some of the later books were okay, though the last one was, of course, a disgusting work through-and-through, senseless and a bit disturbing. The first few were nothing to speak of in my opinion.

Yeah, his writing style isn't good.


That series of books he wrote about the solar system--now those were the stuff of nightmares for me as a kid. For some reason they were just really freaking disturbing, and not in a good way. I can easily believe that any movie adaptation would be better.
The threshold for inclusion in Wikipedia is verifiability, not truth. -- Wikipedia's No Original Research policy page.

In 1966 the Soviets find something on the dark side of the Moon. In 2104 they come back. -- Red Banner / White Star, a nBSG continuation story. Updated to Chapter 4.0 -- 14 January 2013.
User avatar
Edi
Dragonlord
Dragonlord
Posts: 12461
Joined: 2002-07-11 12:27am
Location: Helsinki, Finland

Post by Edi »

Danny Bhoy wrote:Movies from Clive Cussler flicks should be destroyed the moment some idiot thinks that they're a good idea. I liked the Pitt stories, but Raise the Titanic and Sahara movies were beyond clusterfucks.
Not seen Raise the Titanic, but I liked Sahara. One of the best flicks to come out in recent years if you're looking for something somewhat in the style of Indiana Jones or other such lighthearted action.

I've read a couple of the pitt books and the rest are on my to-do list. I had no trouble at all with Sahara and enjoyed it immensely. Even if I did, I have the right to either shut up about it or get my ears blistered off at home, so...

Edi
Warwolf Urban Combat Specialist

Why is it so goddamned hard to get little assholes like you to admit it when you fuck up? Is it pride? What gives you the right to have any pride?
–Darth Wong to vivftp

GOP message? Why don't they just come out of the closet: FASCISTS R' US –Patrick Degan

The GOP has a problem with anyone coming out of the closet. –18-till-I-die
Pick
Sith Marauder
Posts: 3690
Joined: 2005-01-06 12:35am
Location: Oregon, the land of trees and rain!

Post by Pick »

:lol: Duchess, out of my most basic human kindness in regards to the man's legacy, I like to pretend The Last Battle was never written. Worst POS ever.

I am glad I liked Susan in the book when I was younger, though. She was always my favorite. She always seemed smarter than the rest... and I get dark amusement out of her eventual fate in the books :). Way to go, Susan!

As for other good book-to-movie translations, I'm going to be cliche and say Lord of the Rings for a similar reason. The books were pretty tedious.

As for The Last Unicorn? I can't talk about it without being biased. It was my favorite movie as a kid. I still find myself singing that super depressing introductory song randomly. I still love it :lol:.
"The rest of the poem plays upon that pun. On the contrary, says Catullus, although my verses are soft (molliculi ac parum pudici in line 8, reversing the play on words), they can arouse even limp old men. Should Furius and Aurelius have any remaining doubts about Catullus' virility, he offers to fuck them anally and orally to prove otherwise." - Catullus 16, Wikipedia
Image
User avatar
Straha
Lord of the Spam
Posts: 8198
Joined: 2002-07-21 11:59pm
Location: NYC

Post by Straha »

Congo.

I loved the book. It might not have been the best of books, but the one thing it had going for it was that it scared the shit out of me. I always read it before I went to bed, and I had nightmares about those gorillas. Honest scared as ever fucking shit nightmares. Then I saw the movie adaptation, and it was so pitiable it was almost funny.

I hated that adaptation.... it deserved pain.


As for the best adaptation?

I don't know...
'After 9/11, it was "You're with us or your with the terrorists." Now its "You're with Straha or you support racism."' ' - The Romulan Republic

'You're a bully putting on an air of civility while saying that everything western and/or capitalistic must be bad, and a lot of other posters (loomer, Stas Bush, Gandalf) are also going along with it for their own personal reasons (Stas in particular is looking through rose colored glasses)' - Darth Yan
User avatar
Metatwaddle
Jedi Council Member
Posts: 1910
Joined: 2003-07-07 07:29am
Location: Up the Amazon on a Rubber Duck
Contact:

Post by Metatwaddle »

Yeah, I always loved Susan, both in the book and the movie. She was the skeptical, smart one. Peter annoyed me horribly; he never seemed to have any common sense. He just went around pointing swords at people when he had never wielded so much as a knife in his life.

And of course, I agree about The Last Battle.
Should any political party attempt to abolish social security, unemployment insurance, and eliminate labor laws and farm programs, you would not hear of that party again in our political history. There is a tiny splinter group, of course, that believes you can do these things... their number is negligible and they are stupid. --Dwight D. Eisenhower
User avatar
The Grim Squeaker
Emperor's Hand
Posts: 10315
Joined: 2005-06-01 01:44am
Location: A different time-space Continuum
Contact:

Post by The Grim Squeaker »

Another nomination is the first movie of "the 3 musketeers", which was even better than the novel.
The cheorography was beautiful, all the important plot parts were kept and even expanded, the only thing lost was historical accuracy :wink:
Photography
Genius is always allowed some leeway, once the hammer has been pried from its hands and the blood has been cleaned up.
To improve is to change; to be perfect is to change often.
Post Reply