Wireless Routers, Hubs, Network points, Radiation Danger?
Moderator: Edi
Wireless Routers, Hubs, Network points, Radiation Danger?
Mike Wong this is a question for you.
If anyone else has knowledge about this let me know.
I'm planning on buying a Linksys 5 port Ethernet + 802.11b Wireless router for $99 from Amazon.com.
A couple of associates of mine who are Computer and Electrical Engineers at Georgia Tech. They said that it wouldn't be a good idea to put such a device in my dorm room. Prolonged exposure and close proximity to a source of 2.8ghz radio waves isn't good for you. I'm Computer Science at GT, so I haven't had to much instruction about radio waves and signals beyond my Physics courses and my telecommunications classes.
Is there any real danger here? Or can I safely have this thing in my room?
If anyone else has knowledge about this let me know.
I'm planning on buying a Linksys 5 port Ethernet + 802.11b Wireless router for $99 from Amazon.com.
A couple of associates of mine who are Computer and Electrical Engineers at Georgia Tech. They said that it wouldn't be a good idea to put such a device in my dorm room. Prolonged exposure and close proximity to a source of 2.8ghz radio waves isn't good for you. I'm Computer Science at GT, so I haven't had to much instruction about radio waves and signals beyond my Physics courses and my telecommunications classes.
Is there any real danger here? Or can I safely have this thing in my room?
- Darth Wong
- Sith Lord
- Posts: 70028
- Joined: 2002-07-03 12:25am
- Location: Toronto, Canada
- Contact:
Radio waves are non-ionizing radiation. There has never been any evidence that non-ionizing radiation, barring monster doses, has any detrimental effect on living tissue. Some studies have linked increased rates of bacterial growth in a petri dish to strong EM radiation or magnetic fields (albeit in HUGE amounts), but the obvious rebuttal is that even in this case, it was probably due to simple heating, and the bacteria weren't harmed; they just became more energetic.
Basically, this is more of a superstition than a serious threat. They will point out that it's always POSSIBLE, but lots of things are possible. There are supposedly some shaky statistical correlations between certain types of cancer and cell-phone use, but I have yet to see any reputable research to bear that up; it sounds more like sensationalist scare tactics to me.
Basically, this is more of a superstition than a serious threat. They will point out that it's always POSSIBLE, but lots of things are possible. There are supposedly some shaky statistical correlations between certain types of cancer and cell-phone use, but I have yet to see any reputable research to bear that up; it sounds more like sensationalist scare tactics to me.
"It's not evil for God to do it. Or for someone to do it at God's command."- Jonathan Boyd on baby-killing
"you guys are fascinated with the use of those "rules of logic" to the extent that you don't really want to discussus anything."- GC
"I do not believe Russian Roulette is a stupid act" - Embracer of Darkness
"Viagra commercials appear to save lives" - tharkûn on US health care.
http://www.stardestroyer.net/Mike/RantMode/Blurbs.html
"you guys are fascinated with the use of those "rules of logic" to the extent that you don't really want to discussus anything."- GC
"I do not believe Russian Roulette is a stupid act" - Embracer of Darkness
"Viagra commercials appear to save lives" - tharkûn on US health care.
http://www.stardestroyer.net/Mike/RantMode/Blurbs.html
- EmperorMing
- Sith Devotee
- Posts: 3432
- Joined: 2002-09-09 05:08am
- Location: The Lizard Lounge
- EmperorMing
- Sith Devotee
- Posts: 3432
- Joined: 2002-09-09 05:08am
- Location: The Lizard Lounge
I would say so...Shinova wrote:EmperorMing wrote:There shouldn't be anything to be afraid of in that setup.
Then again I preffer a hardline as opposed to wireless. Just a little paranoid, mind you...
And this is from pure speculation, but hardline would be much more efficient and quicker as well
Especially when moving *large* files around...
DILLIGAF: Does It Look Like I Give A Fuck
Kill your God!
- TrailerParkJawa
- Sith Acolyte
- Posts: 5850
- Joined: 2002-07-04 11:49pm
- Location: San Jose, California
Cordless phones are either 900Mhz or 2.4Ghz.
Howedar is no longer here. Need to talk to him? Talk to Pick.
- Einhander Sn0m4n
- Insane Railgunner
- Posts: 18630
- Joined: 2002-10-01 05:51am
- Location: Louisiana... or Dagobah. You know, where Yoda lives.
- Illuminatus Primus
- All Seeing Eye
- Posts: 15774
- Joined: 2002-10-12 02:52pm
- Location: Gainesville, Florida, USA
- Contact:
An uncle of mine worked at one of DEW or such radio installations in Greenland in the '50's. Him and a lot of his fellow workers got cancer and I mean an odd proporition.Darth Wong wrote:Radio waves are non-ionizing radiation. There has never been any evidence that non-ionizing radiation, barring monster doses, has any detrimental effect on living tissue. Some studies have linked increased rates of bacterial growth in a petri dish to strong EM radiation or magnetic fields (albeit in HUGE amounts), but the obvious rebuttal is that even in this case, it was probably due to simple heating, and the bacteria weren't harmed; they just became more energetic.
Basically, this is more of a superstition than a serious threat. They will point out that it's always POSSIBLE, but lots of things are possible. There are supposedly some shaky statistical correlations between certain types of cancer and cell-phone use, but I have yet to see any reputable research to bear that up; it sounds more like sensationalist scare tactics to me.
"You know what the problem with Hollywood is. They make shit. Unbelievable. Unremarkable. Shit." - Gabriel Shear, Swordfish
"This statement, in its utterly clueless hubristic stupidity, cannot be improved upon. I merely quote it in admiration of its perfection." - Garibaldi in reply to an incredibly stupid post.
The Fifth Illuminatus Primus | Warsie | Skeptical Empiricist | Florida Gator | Sustainability Advocate | Libertarian Socialist |
"This statement, in its utterly clueless hubristic stupidity, cannot be improved upon. I merely quote it in admiration of its perfection." - Garibaldi in reply to an incredibly stupid post.
The Fifth Illuminatus Primus | Warsie | Skeptical Empiricist | Florida Gator | Sustainability Advocate | Libertarian Socialist |
- CmdrSweevo
- Requiescat in Pace
- Posts: 128
- Joined: 2002-08-27 05:53am
And it's less of an adventure trying to set it up. Took me a week to find the magic order I had to boot the computers in to get a connection. That was after I had to fix the ISDN drivers it trashed.EmperorMing wrote:I would say so...Shinova wrote:EmperorMing wrote:There shouldn't be anything to be afraid of in that setup.
Then again I preffer a hardline as opposed to wireless. Just a little paranoid, mind you...
And this is from pure speculation, but hardline would be much more efficient and quicker as well
Especially when moving *large* files around...
Assuming that the EW radars were to blame, there's a huge difference between that linksys router and those things.Illuminatus Primus wrote:An uncle of mine worked at one of DEW or such radio installations in Greenland in the '50's. Him and a lot of his fellow workers got cancer and I mean an odd proporition.Darth Wong wrote:Radio waves are non-ionizing radiation. There has never been any evidence that non-ionizing radiation, barring monster doses, has any detrimental effect on living tissue. Some studies have linked increased rates of bacterial growth in a petri dish to strong EM radiation or magnetic fields (albeit in HUGE amounts), but the obvious rebuttal is that even in this case, it was probably due to simple heating, and the bacteria weren't harmed; they just became more energetic.
Basically, this is more of a superstition than a serious threat. They will point out that it's always POSSIBLE, but lots of things are possible. There are supposedly some shaky statistical correlations between certain types of cancer and cell-phone use, but I have yet to see any reputable research to bear that up; it sounds more like sensationalist scare tactics to me.
Re: Wireless Routers, Hubs, Network points, Radiation Danger
While that router is perfectly acceptable, I would not suggest buying their WLAN cards. Go with Proxim's Orinoco line or Cisco's Aironet 350 line. They are more expensive, but offer far greater performance.Lord MJ wrote:Mike Wong this is a question for you.
If anyone else has knowledge about this let me know.
I'm planning on buying a Linksys 5 port Ethernet + 802.11b Wireless router for $99 from Amazon.com.
- Colonel Olrik
- The Spaminator
- Posts: 6121
- Joined: 2002-08-26 06:54pm
- Location: Munich, Germany
- Darth Wong
- Sith Lord
- Posts: 70028
- Joined: 2002-07-03 12:25am
- Location: Toronto, Canada
- Contact:
Working in close proximity to a major transmitter or radar array is a monster dose. Monster doses of pretty much anything can be extremely hazardous, even sunlight. That does not mean that infinitesimal doses should be feared.
"It's not evil for God to do it. Or for someone to do it at God's command."- Jonathan Boyd on baby-killing
"you guys are fascinated with the use of those "rules of logic" to the extent that you don't really want to discussus anything."- GC
"I do not believe Russian Roulette is a stupid act" - Embracer of Darkness
"Viagra commercials appear to save lives" - tharkûn on US health care.
http://www.stardestroyer.net/Mike/RantMode/Blurbs.html
"you guys are fascinated with the use of those "rules of logic" to the extent that you don't really want to discussus anything."- GC
"I do not believe Russian Roulette is a stupid act" - Embracer of Darkness
"Viagra commercials appear to save lives" - tharkûn on US health care.
http://www.stardestroyer.net/Mike/RantMode/Blurbs.html