Vendetta wrote:TheFeniX wrote:Wait, did someone edit turtles into the new Batman movie?
The Turtles comics started as a parody of grimdark 80s/90s comics, so y'know that's probably not a bad way of approaching a modern movie of them...
I get this is hypocritical on my part since even the 80s cartoon wasn't faithful to the original: but the popularity of TMNT came from said cartoon, rather than their origins.
The original premise (of the cartoon) was pretty dumb: random toxic waste mutates 4 turtles and a man into mutants who kung-fu fight their way against an evil man in desperate need of a metal wax. But that really didn't matter, because nothing about anything had to make sense. Like in the latest movie (SPOILERS!): Patrick Stewart is a 10,000 year old Mayan (or whatever) general who is cursed with immortality and has to round up a bunch of monsters so he can finally die. Also, Raphael is a dick and
motherfuckin' Casey Jones!
Right off the bat, we have to ask the question for the new movie: in their bid to create super-soliders, someone thought box-turtle genetics were the way to go? Why? Speed? Their ability to roll over when knocked on their back? The diseases they carry? Since when do we need super-soldiers to fight crime? Crime is this bad? Where's the national guard (oh wait, they don't exist in Hollywood writing). In what way would spending millions (or billions) on genetic research to make 4 mutant turtles be better than just hiring a shit-load more cops? Why is Megan Fox still allowed to "act" in movies. Seriously, Gellar was awesome in the CGI movie. Also, she can act and is much easier on the eyes than Fox.
Anyways, once you start building somewhat of a believable premise, I start drinking heavily and tearing your stupid-shit writing apart, like in "The Dark Knight." Because people ate that shit up, but it's just as stupid and convoluted as the plot of Final Fantasy VII that nerds masturbate to. And Dark Knight didn't have to contend with translation failures, so it's even worse.