Naval designation cut-off

OT: anything goes!

Moderator: Edi

Post Reply
User avatar
Supreme_Warlord
Youngling
Posts: 149
Joined: 2002-07-04 12:04pm
Location: East Ham, London, United Kingdom, Europe, Earth, Sol System, Orion Arm, Milky Way, Universe

Naval designation cut-off

Post by Supreme_Warlord »

Hi,
Anyway who knows, please help me with the following question.

At what point does the designation capital ship no longer apply? I am pretty sure that anything from a cruiser upwards is designated as such, but specifically, can a destroyer or a frigate be labelled likewise?

Thanks.
For those who believe, no explanation is necessary. For those who do not, no explanation will suffice.

Men don't follow titles, they follow courage!
________________________________________

100th post on Wed, 28 Apr, 2004 15:23
User avatar
Sea Skimmer
Yankee Capitalist Air Pirate
Posts: 37390
Joined: 2002-07-03 11:49pm
Location: Passchendaele City, HAB

Post by Sea Skimmer »

Capital ships are battleships, battlecruisers and more recently aircraft carriers. Cruisers are not capital ships.

The term is often blurred by sci fi fans who refer to anything bigger then a fighter as a capital ship.
"This cult of special forces is as sensible as to form a Royal Corps of Tree Climbers and say that no soldier who does not wear its green hat with a bunch of oak leaves stuck in it should be expected to climb a tree"
— Field Marshal William Slim 1956
User avatar
Sir Sirius
Sith Devotee
Posts: 2975
Joined: 2002-12-09 12:15pm
Location: 6 hr 45 min R.A. and -16 degrees 43 minutes declination

Post by Sir Sirius »

Monitors have on occasion been counted as capital ships as well, possibly due to their armament, but those instances were the exeption, not the rule.
Image
User avatar
Grand Admiral Thrawn
Ruthless Imperial Tyrant
Posts: 5755
Joined: 2002-07-03 06:11pm
Location: Canada

Post by Grand Admiral Thrawn »

Could the Kirov be called a Capital Ship?
"You know, I was God once."
"Yes, I saw. You were doing well, until everyone died."
Bender and God, Futurama
User avatar
Col. Crackpot
That Obnoxious Guy
Posts: 10228
Joined: 2002-10-28 05:04pm
Location: Rhode Island
Contact:

Post by Col. Crackpot »

Grand Admiral Thrawn wrote:Could the Kirov be called a Capital Ship?
i would imagine so, she's only half a dozen or so meters shorter than the Iowa BB's even though she's a cruiser by name.


EDIT: i found some stuff:

Kirov: http://www.warships1.com/RUSrkr05_Ushakov_specs.htm

Iowa: http://www.warships1.com/USbb61_specs.htm
"This business will get out of control. It will get out of control and we’ll be lucky to live through it.” -Tom Clancy
User avatar
Frank Hipper
Overfiend of the Superego
Posts: 12882
Joined: 2002-10-17 08:48am
Location: Hamilton, Ohio?

Post by Frank Hipper »

"Capitol" Ship is a term that is losing it's meaning due to a blurring of definition. It could be argued that SSBNs are the premiere capitol ships of the U.S. navy. Then again, modern destroyers are of a size and capability to earn them the title, too.

And I'd rate the Kirovs as capitol ships, without doubt. In the classic sense.
Image
Life is all the eternity you get, use it wisely.
User avatar
Sea Skimmer
Yankee Capitalist Air Pirate
Posts: 37390
Joined: 2002-07-03 11:49pm
Location: Passchendaele City, HAB

Post by Sea Skimmer »

Grand Admiral Thrawn wrote:Could the Kirov be called a Capital Ship?
Yup, by size and role there capital ships. Often there referred to as being CBN's, CB is basically what the USN uses to designate battlecruisers. N is nuclear of course.
"This cult of special forces is as sensible as to form a Royal Corps of Tree Climbers and say that no soldier who does not wear its green hat with a bunch of oak leaves stuck in it should be expected to climb a tree"
— Field Marshal William Slim 1956
Howedar
Emperor's Thumb
Posts: 12472
Joined: 2002-07-03 05:06pm
Location: St. Paul, MN

Post by Howedar »

Given the flag facilities aboard a Ticonderoga, it *might* be within the capital ship designation.
Howedar is no longer here. Need to talk to him? Talk to Pick.
Post Reply