USAF, What should the focus on?

OT: anything goes!

Moderator: Edi

What should the USAF concentrate on?

Stealth Technology such as the B-2 and F-117
2
7%
Fast and Hard Hitting such as the B-1, B-52, A-10, and F-15/16/and 18
11
39%
Both Evenly
15
54%
 
Total votes: 28

User avatar
Crown
NARF
Posts: 10615
Joined: 2002-07-11 11:45am
Location: In Transit ...

Post by Crown »

Space tech. Okay so I want to ensure employment for myself, sue me!
Image
Η ζωή, η ζωή εδω τελειώνει!
"Science is one cold-hearted bitch with a 14" strap-on" - Masuka 'Dexter'
"Angela is not the woman you think she is Gabriel, she's done terrible things"
"So have I, and I'm going to do them all to you." - Sylar to Arthur 'Heroes'
User avatar
Typhonis 1
Rabid Monkey Scientist
Posts: 5791
Joined: 2002-07-06 12:07am
Location: deep within a secret cloning lab hidden in the brotherhood of the monkey thread

Post by Typhonis 1 »

more AC-130s :twisted:
Brotherhood of the Bear Monkey Clonemaster , Anti Care Bears League,
Bureaucrat and BOFH of the HAB,
Skunk Works director of the Mecha Maniacs,
Black Mage,

I AM BACK! let the SCIENCE commence!
User avatar
Sea Skimmer
Yankee Capitalist Air Pirate
Posts: 37390
Joined: 2002-07-03 11:49pm
Location: Passchendaele City, HAB

Post by Sea Skimmer »

Typhonis 1 wrote:more AC-130s :twisted:
Clearly a AC-225, a gunship conversion of the world's largest plane the An-225, would be far more effective, if a little fast. Then there always the AB-36 option.. :twisted:
"This cult of special forces is as sensible as to form a Royal Corps of Tree Climbers and say that no soldier who does not wear its green hat with a bunch of oak leaves stuck in it should be expected to climb a tree"
— Field Marshal William Slim 1956
weemadando
SMAKIBBFB
Posts: 19195
Joined: 2002-07-28 12:30pm
Contact:

Post by weemadando »

Spanky The Dolphin wrote:
XaLEv wrote:
Spanky The Dolphin wrote: You do know that I'm talking about the Valkyries from Macross. right?
Bah! Brood War Valkyries forever! :P
*gasp*! You heretic!! Battroid mode, GERWALK mode forever, \/\/00t, \/\/00t !!
GERWALK!!!!
User avatar
phongn
Rebel Leader
Posts: 18487
Joined: 2002-07-03 11:11pm

Post by phongn »

Sea Skimmer wrote:
phongn wrote:I hear the Russians are moving away from R-77 development - those funky control surfaces aren't living up to expectations. IIRC, they're continuing development in the R-27 series.
What I hear is that the R-77 production is being delayed in favor of an improved and revised version, while training rounds and equipment are being delivered to those nations which signed contracts, and to the Russian airforce.
Ahh.
I also read a while back that the next R-27's may have the R-77's seeker, making them AMRAAM lights basically.
Doesn't R-27 already outrange AMRAAM? I know it was apparently superior to AIM-7 (hard not to be).
Nathan F
Resident Redneck
Posts: 4979
Joined: 2002-09-10 08:01am
Location: Around the corner
Contact:

Post by Nathan F »

Typhonis 1 wrote:more AC-130s :twisted:
yes, definitely. They have proven their worth in every single conflict that has taken place that the US has participated in since they were first used in the early seventies. Everywhere from Panama to the Gulf to Afghanistan. They are able to lay alot of lead and 105mm shells in an exact area in a short period of time. With constant avionics updates coming online, these aircraft are well worth the money we spend on them. And the C-130 airframe is a VERY tough bird. It has the ability to operate from short rough fields and are hard to shoot down simply because of their durability. And once the AC starts shooting, usually there is nothing left to shoot back.
User avatar
TrailerParkJawa
Sith Acolyte
Posts: 5850
Joined: 2002-07-04 11:49pm
Location: San Jose, California

Post by TrailerParkJawa »

AC-130's are badass. The only caveat is they need to make sure the SAM threat is taken care of. ( Fighters too, but thats obvious )

Sadly, we lost an AC-130 in the Gulf War with all aboard.
Nathan F
Resident Redneck
Posts: 4979
Joined: 2002-09-10 08:01am
Location: Around the corner
Contact:

Post by Nathan F »

Hmm, i hadnt heard about that. But, all in all, thats not all that bad. One plane lost in how many dozens of operations?
User avatar
TrailerParkJawa
Sith Acolyte
Posts: 5850
Joined: 2002-07-04 11:49pm
Location: San Jose, California

Post by TrailerParkJawa »

The loss rate was very low in Desert Storm. The USAF did a good job, I was just pointing out that the AC-130's need to be used very carefully.

They are great weapons for terrorizing isolated pockets of ground troops.

I found a personal tribute to the lost AC-130. Check it out.

http://www.specialoperations.com/Memorial/spirit.html
User avatar
Sea Skimmer
Yankee Capitalist Air Pirate
Posts: 37390
Joined: 2002-07-03 11:49pm
Location: Passchendaele City, HAB

Post by Sea Skimmer »

NF_Utvol wrote:Hmm, i hadnt heard about that. But, all in all, thats not all that bad. One plane lost in how many dozens of operations?
A single AC-130 was brought down by a MANPADS SAM, likely SA-7. For the minigun's and to an extent to 40mm weapons to be effective the AC-130 must fly within the envelope of MANPADS and most triple A.

The AC-130 in question had been flying a night mission during the battle for Kafji but did not depart as the sun rose because the situation was looking very bad. Less then 5 minutes later it was hit.

Several where also lost in Nam to MANPADS during The North's 1972 offensive. This led to an order to fly at least 15,000 feet and used only the 40mm and 105 howitzers.
"This cult of special forces is as sensible as to form a Royal Corps of Tree Climbers and say that no soldier who does not wear its green hat with a bunch of oak leaves stuck in it should be expected to climb a tree"
— Field Marshal William Slim 1956
User avatar
spongyblue
Jedi Knight
Posts: 893
Joined: 2002-07-20 05:26pm
Location: Mother Natures personal Beyoch

Post by spongyblue »

Ac-130's kick ass. I see those fuckers everyday, and work about 1000 yards from them. Stareing down a howitzer barrel is pretty cool
Nathan F
Resident Redneck
Posts: 4979
Joined: 2002-09-10 08:01am
Location: Around the corner
Contact:

Post by Nathan F »

You work on Hurlburt Field or at Eglin? They are both cool places. Hehe, if you work for the AF, and you like fishing, go charter the fishing boat out of Eglin AFB. For AF employees, it is 40 bucks for a day long guided deep sea fishing trip. Which is an absolutely Great deal.
User avatar
Wicked Pilot
Moderator Emeritus
Posts: 8972
Joined: 2002-07-05 05:45pm

Post by Wicked Pilot »

I hear Eglin's getting the first F-22s. Then they'll have the world's most advanced fighter plane, and the world's largets refridgerator.
The most basic assumption about the world is that it does not contradict itself.
Nathan F
Resident Redneck
Posts: 4979
Joined: 2002-09-10 08:01am
Location: Around the corner
Contact:

Post by Nathan F »

Wicked Pilot wrote:I hear Eglin's getting the first F-22s. Then they'll have the world's most advanced fighter plane, and the world's largets refridgerator.
Lol, quite true. It is very possible that Eglin will get the first squadron of F-22s. Currently they have a detachment of F-15s at the base, and they have extensive testing facilities, so it would seem that they would be a logical choice for the first F-22s.
Post Reply