![Shocked :shock:](./images/smilies/icon_eek.gif)
~ver
Moderator: Edi
Dude.. It's David Letterman. Course, it could be worse.. It could be Jay Leno.Hotfoot wrote:Unless he's giving birth, I don't see how this means the world is ending.
Yes he is. And yes he is.StormTrooperTR889 wrote:Letterman is never shown from the waist down. Therefor, I have reached the obvious conclusion. He is not wearing any pants.
Isn't his show produced by a company called "Worldwide Pants"??StormTrooperTR889 wrote:Letterman is never shown from the waist down. Therefor, I have reached the obvious conclusion. He is not wearing any pants.
Yes, it is.. o.OSimon H.Johansen wrote:Isn't his show produced by a company called "Worldwide Pants"??StormTrooperTR889 wrote:Letterman is never shown from the waist down. Therefor, I have reached the obvious conclusion. He is not wearing any pants.
Eh. The beginning of the end of the world won't come until George W. Bush has a child.verilon wrote:David Letterman is having a child.
~ver
I thought ahead.Kuja wrote:Eh. The beginning of the end of the world won't come until George W. Bush has a child.verilon wrote:David Letterman is having a child.
~ver
Wait a minute...
Right.. It would definitely drag into his normal comedy.. and that would kill it, IMO. I think he's better than Leno because of his dry humour..Darth Wong wrote:Letterman rules. Although I am forced to wonder if he will start doing the same kind of "domestic comedy" that so many comedians rely upon, where he talks about the foibles of childraising and marriage. Such routines can be funny, but they're not Dave's traditional style.
Damn that Mars!Gil Hamilton wrote:Huh. Conan O'Brien is having a kid soon too. Maybe late night comedians have fertility cycles that line up with astrological phenomena, or some shit like that.